Ohio Chatter DEV

Automatik

Have you planned your exit strategy yet?

isadore

wkfan;1792794 wrote:She does this no matter who she is talking to or debating.....this is not limited to Trump.

This is ingrained into who....and what....she is.

gosh a ruddies, now that is what is ingrained, misogyny.

MontyBrunswick

just donated $50 to hillary!!!!!!!

QuakerOats

(Washington, DC) – The Obama State Department last week admitted it withheld a key Benghazi email of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from Judicial Watch since at least September 2014. If the State Department disclosed the email when first supposedly found, Clinton’s email server and her hidden emails would have been disclosed nearly two years ago, before Clinton authorized the alleged deletion of tens of thousands emails.
Last week’s document production also includes material from a records cache of thousands of new Clinton State Department records supposedly only discovered in December 2015. The new material shows the State Department compiled extensive Libya/Benghazi-related dossiers on Republican and Democrat senators.
“Now we know the Obama administration consciously refused to give up key information about Hillary Clinton’s email in 2014. It covered up this email both from the court and Judicial Watch,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Judge Lamberth was right when he suggested that Obama’s State Department acted in bad faith. This cover-up provided Hillary Clinton enough time to hide potentially thousands of government records. One aim of our court-order discovery will be to get to the bottom of this cover-up.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/state-department-hid-key-clinton-benghazi-email-from-judicial-watch/

CenterBHSFan

^
Unfortunately for... well... everyone... There will still be people voting for that jackass simply because she has a "D" next to her name. They will do so because they think that the democrat party is still what it used to be and/or for some sort of cause lol!

Automatik

That happens with Republicans too unfortunately.

Trump has something like a 12% to win right now.

Hillary for the next 8 years. I've accepted it.

QuakerOats

I can't count The Donald out, especially against an inept, lying, money-laundering bitch.

Heretic

QuakerOats;1793399 wrote:I can't count The Donald out, especially against an inept, lying, money-laundering bitch.

That Christ-like attitude bullshit's really working for you, eh?

sleeper

Automatik;1793398 wrote:That happens with Republicans too unfortunately.

Trump has something like a 12% to win right now.

Hillary for the next 8 years. I've accepted it.

I've also accepted it but I will enjoy the debates.

Automatik

She will win by a landslide.

ptown_trojans_1

QuakerOats;1793399 wrote:I can't count The Donald out, especially against an inept, lying, money-laundering bitch.

Math.

Donald has to show he can get red states red and get blue states to turn blue.
His numbers with Latinos and women could kill him in some states.
I'm not sure he can swing Colorado, New Mexico, Virginia, or Ohio.

I could see a massacre election more likely than a close one.
Trump would have to radically change his numbers in order to get to 270.

like_that

Automatik;1793398 wrote:That happens with Republicans too unfortunately.

Trump has something like a 12% to win right now.

Hillary for the next 8 years. I've accepted it.

I don't think either winner will be a two term president.

QuakerOats

Heretic;1793400 wrote:That Christ-like attitude bullshit's really working for you, eh?

The Lord gifted us with intelligence and a conscience to make judgments and always be truthful.

Best

QuakerOats

ptown_trojans_1;1793406 wrote:Math.

Trump would have to radically change his numbers in order to get to 270.

Actually he needs to only change 4 states (from Romney - 206) to get 270:

Ohio (18)
Florida (29)
Virginia (13)
New Hampshire (4)

Obviously there are many other options, but those are the states to focus on and win I think.

ptown_trojans_1

QuakerOats;1793428 wrote:Actually he needs to only change 4 states (from Romney - 206) to get 270:

Ohio (18)
Florida (29)
Virginia (13)
New Hampshire (4)

Obviously there are many other options, but those are the states to focus on and win I think.

I don't see VA and NH flipping unless Trump changes a lot. Trump won VA, but it was really close. NOVA dominates VA now.
NH hasn't flipped since 2004, I'm not sure it can be flipped back to red yet.

Ohio and Florida, I'll give you as toss ups maybe, depending on VP picks and a number of things.
But, then again, as I mentioned, I could see a blowout more likely than a close one.

sleeper

QuakerOats;1793428 wrote:Actually he needs to only change 4 states (from Romney - 206) to get 270:

Ohio (18)
Florida (29)
Virginia (13)
New Hampshire (4)

Obviously there are many other options, but those are the states to focus on and win I think.

I'd be willing to bet any amount of money that Trump will lose Virginia. Virginia seems to be turning more and more left and I've met zero people here that support Trump.

I don't see him winning Ohio either.

like_that

sleeper;1793522 wrote:I'd be willing to bet any amount of money that Trump will lose Virginia. Virginia seems to be turning more and more left and I've met zero people here that support Trump.

I don't see him winning Ohio either.

I don't see him winning any of the swing states, but have you been/near to Charlottesville?

It's very right once you leave the NCR.

QuakerOats

I could see him winning Ohio and Florida, but you are right about Virginia; especially since northern Virginia is in the tank for continued BIG government spending. And of course you have the corrupt governor there just granting 200,000 felons the right to vote. Uphill climb for sure, so hopefully there are a few other states to target and win.

SportsAndLady

QuakerOats;1793528 wrote:I could see him winning Ohio and Florida, but you are right about Virginia; especially since northern Virginia is in the tank for continued BIG government spending. And of course you have the corrupt governor there just granting 200,000 felons the right to vote. Uphill climb for sure, so hopefully there are a few other states to target and win.

There's no way he wins Ohio or Florida.

ptown_trojans_1

like_that;1793527 wrote:I don't see him winning any of the swing states, but have you been/near to Charlottesville?

It's very right once you leave the NCR.

?
The area near UVA and JMU is heavy heavy blue. I'll also say the area around Richmond and Norfolk are also blue.
Now, outside the cities of Charlottesville and Harrisburg, in the wine county, it is red.

ptown_trojans_1

QuakerOats;1793528 wrote:I could see him winning Ohio and Florida, but you are right about Virginia; especially since northern Virginia is in the tank for continued BIG government spending. And of course you have the corrupt governor there just granting 200,000 felons the right to vote. Uphill climb for sure, so hopefully there are a few other states to target and win.

You do know a lot of NOVA is IT and DOD spending right?
As for the Governor's move, yeah, that was pure politics.

sleeper

like_that;1793527 wrote:I don't see him winning any of the swing states, but have you been/near to Charlottesville?

It's very right once you leave the NCR.

I stay away from trash places like Charlottesville.

like_that

sleeper;1793538 wrote:I stay away from trash places like Charlottesville.

Then why do you live in Arlington (or was it Alexandria)?

QuakerOats

SportsAndLady;1793530 wrote:There's no way he wins Ohio or Florida.

Not so sure about that; this race seems to defy 'normal' stuff. Trump visits Youngstown and 18,000 people show up; Clinton goes to Cleveland and they probably have to pay 1,200 to show up.

Of course, when Cuyahoga County and Dade County wait until last to report in order to see how many votes they need to make up, all bets are off.

sleeper

like_that;1793588 wrote:Then why do you live in Arlington (or was it Alexandria)?

Quality luxury apartments.