Archive

Hillary Clinton

  • jmog
    BoatShoes;1817770 wrote:What's funny is that the wikileaks emails reveal that it is not even close to as bad as you believe it is and the conservative media says it is but you can't shake the faith of a true believer.
    Exhibit A that you didn't actually read the wikileaks emails.
  • QuakerOats
    isadore;1817813 wrote:gosh a ruddies

    Donald Dumbass' antics take the media attention off whatever supposed revelations are generated from the hacks
    The major media IS the Clinton campaign; her corruption and criminality will never, and would never, make the headlines, no matter what. EVERYONE knows this, why try to act like you don't?
  • isadore
    QuakerOats;1818206 wrote:The major media IS the Clinton campaign; her corruption and criminality will never, and would never, make the headlines, no matter what. EVERYONE knows this, why try to act like you don't?
    Gosh a ruddies the Republican Party nominates the most repulsive, least qualified individual to be nominated by a major Party and you whine about the negative coverage. Wow.
  • QuakerOats
    In '12 the nominee was Mr. Romney who was the most wholesome, sharp, gentle, well-spoken, charitable, and pragmatic person perhaps in history .................and of course he was completely vilified and crucified by the radical leftists who control major media. Nice try though.
  • Heretic
    QuakerOats;1818244 wrote:In '12 the nominee was Mr. Romney who was the most wholesome, sharp, gentle, well-spoken, charitable, and pragmatic person perhaps in history .................and of course he was completely vilified and crucified by the radical leftists who control major media. Nice try though.
    Lol, you are a source of constant entertainment with your constant histrionics and wild exaggerations.

    "NO ONE IN THE WORLD'S HISTORY WAS AS GREAT A HUMAN AS THIS MAN...and the evil lefties ruined him...and us...forever...*sob*"
  • jmog
    QO's obvious hyperbole aside, Romney was a rather generous (as evidence by his tax returns) and genuinely nice guy and he most certainly was vilified and laughed at by the left.

    Heck, the left completely laughed at him saying Russia was a big threat...now the same left can't stop talking about Russia as a threat.

    Romney was vilified by the media/left when his hot mic "47% won't vote for me no matter what I do" comment. Hillary straight out calls 25% of the voters deplorable and you wouldn't have known about it unless you watch Fox.

    So while QO is way off base most of the time he is right that the media would vilify the R candidate no matter how nice of a person he was, heck, look at how they treated Dr. Carson who really is one of the nicest people to have run for POTUS in MANY decades.
  • sleeper
    jmog;1818265 wrote:QO's obvious hyperbole aside, Romney was a rather generous (as evidence by his tax returns) and genuinely nice guy and he most certainly was vilified and laughed at by the left.

    Heck, the left completely laughed at him saying Russia was a big threat...now the same left can't stop talking about Russia as a threat.

    Romney was vilified by the media/left when his hot mic "47% won't vote for me no matter what I do" comment. Hillary straight out calls 25% of the voters deplorable and you wouldn't have known about it unless you watch Fox.

    So while QO is way off base most of the time he is right that the media would vilify the R candidate no matter how nice of a person he was, heck, look at how they treated Dr. Carson who really is one of the nicest people to have run for POTUS in MANY decades.
    I certainly agree with him there.

    However, this is Donald Trump not Romney. The media is not villifying him; he's doing that himself. He is unequivocally the WORST presidential candidate ever to run and makes Gore look credible.
  • isadore
    QuakerOats;1818244 wrote:In '12 the nominee was Mr. Romney who was the most wholesome, sharp, gentle, well-spoken, charitable, and pragmatic person perhaps in history .................and of course he was completely vilified and crucified by the radical leftists who control major media. Nice try though.
    He was also an elitist corporate shill. Oh yes and he was not running against Hillary Clinton but Barack Obama. Who has proved to be a popular President. He is more popular at this time in his term than Ronald Reagan.

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx
  • QuakerOats
    isadore;1818305 wrote:He was also an elitist corporate shill.

    Hardly, but you wouldn't know a successful turnaround expert from a switchboard operator, so have at it.
  • bases_loaded
    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31077 I'm confused...ISADORE HELP
  • Wolves of Babylon
    QuakerOats;1818244 wrote:In '12 the nominee was Mr. Romney who was the most wholesome, sharp, gentle, well-spoken, charitable, and pragmatic person perhaps in history .................and of course he was completely vilified and crucified by the radical leftists who control major media. Nice try though.
    And Romney probably defeats Hilary pretty easily. The Republicans nominated the one person who is more hated than Hilary. This should have been a cakewalk.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
  • isadore
    QuakerOats;1818370 wrote:Hardly, but you wouldn't know a successful turnaround expert from a switchboard operator, so have at it.
    gosh a ruddies, switchboard operators don't throw thousands of people out of their jobs.
  • isadore
    bases_loaded;1818393 wrote:https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31077 I'm confused...ISADORE HELP
    Gosh a ruddies SVR generated slander.
  • QuakerOats
    isadore;1818395 wrote:gosh a ruddies, switchboard operators don't throw thousands of people out of their jobs.
    on cue; thanks
  • bases_loaded
    isadore;1818396 wrote:Gosh a ruddies SVR generated slander.
    SVR?
  • majorspark
    bases_loaded;1818420 wrote:SVR?
    Russian intelligence.
  • bases_loaded
    LOL still on the Russians
  • QuakerOats
    If the Russians are now to blame for everything, does that mean Bush is finally off the hook?
  • CenterBHSFan
    QuakerOats;1818438 wrote:If the Russians are now to blame for everything, does that mean Bush is finally off the hook?
    No, it's supposed to mean that Trump is to blame. His mancrush and all that :RpS_razz:
  • isadore
    QuakerOats;1818413 wrote:on cue; thanks
    for the truth
  • QuakerOats
    http://observer.com/2016/10/2006-audio-emerges-of-hillary-clinton-proposing-rigging-palestine-election/



    She pushed for rigging Palestine election.

    More truth; own it.
  • QuakerOats
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/11/07/real-story-behind-hillarys-reckless-failure-to-protect-classified-information.html


    No doubt she is the most unfit to ever seek the office.
  • jedbartlet02

    That's an opinion article bro
  • like_that
    Anyone who doesn't think Hillary did any wrong either A. has never worked in a secret or classified environment or B. chooses to be a delusional partisan sheep. The basics of OPSEC training would tell you immediately that Hillary did wrong.