Archive

Is this close to the truth?

  • CenterBHSFan
    I Wear Pants;737707 wrote:You're not a racist because you're a birther. But you are likely uninformed or unintelligent or just lying.

    And I didn't mean you particularly when I said "You're".
    It's folks like Louie that you need to tell that to, not Believer lol
  • Writerbuckeye
    O-Trap;737393 wrote:If Obama had been a Republican, I can guarantee that most who oppose him currently would be supporting him tooth-and-nail, to the degree that many of THEM would probably call the Democrats who opposed him racists.

    Oh it would be such fun to see how this would play out if the shoe was on the other foot ...

    You're dead wrong. Obama's policies would have him being opposed by the same group opposing him now. On the other hand, you'd likely have the Democrats STILL calling everyone who opposed him racists, because he would be doing things they want done.

    If Obama were a conservative president, the left would have campaigned against him as being an Uncle Tom (not really black). Since they're sensitive about racial matters, they're allowed to make racist comments about black people who don't agree with their politics.

    See how that works? :)
  • O-Trap
    Writerbuckeye;737799 wrote:You're dead wrong. Obama's policies would have him being opposed by the same group opposing him now. On the other hand, you'd likely have the Democrats STILL calling everyone who opposed him racists, because he would be doing things they want done.
    What I meant when I said if Obama ran as a Republican, I meant with Republican policies. I meant if Obama ran the country like he was the second-coming of Ronald Reagan.
    Writerbuckeye;737799 wrote:If Obama were a conservative president, the left would have campaigned against him as being an Uncle Tom (not really black). Since they're sensitive about racial matters, they're allowed to make racist comments about black people who don't agree with their politics.

    See how that works? :)
    Very much so. I'd nearly guarantee that if his policies and affiliations were switched, the two main parties would be singing each other's songs.
  • I Wear Pants
    CenterBHSFan;737719 wrote:It's folks like Louie that you need to tell that to, not Believer lol
    Wasn't trying to imply that Believer...believed that. I was agreeing with him. Being a birther doesn't make you a racist. I happen to think it's insane to be one (by a birther I mean someone who genuinely believes all the crap and fully thinks he's not a citizen. Not people who think it's weird how there isn't a wealth of knowledge about his earlier life, that's a reasonable question that I feel many tea party/glenn beck types are making unreasonable conclusions from. Run on.) but even so it doesn't make you a racist.
  • CenterBHSFan
    There's a hot debate going on my facebook right now about just this issue. Somebody else (not me lol) commented that it wasn't a racial issue when McCain was looked into. So far, not one of the "Racials" have replied to that comment. That's very, VERY telling to me.

    And I'm gonna start calling the race card people "Racials".
  • Bigred1995
    It appears Michele Bachmann thinks this is a non-issue!

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2011/04/rep-michele-bachmann-says-president-barack-obamas-certificate-settles-birther-issue.html
  • O-Trap

    k.
  • Bigred1995
    O-Trap;745959 wrote:k.
    [video][/video]

    :)
  • O-Trap
    Bigred1995;745991 wrote:[video][/video]

    :)

    grr
  • jhay78
    I'd love to see the Donald sit down with George "You mean your Christian faith" Stephanopoulos and a similar line of questioning, and see that exchange.
  • I Wear Pants
    It's weird seeing Bachmann say something rational.

    It's also weird to see someone blame Obama for the tax cut extension. And I don't mean blame him in that he signed it because he certainly did and he and his party could have not done so if they didn't want to. I mean blame as in she implied that he wanted the tax cuts to continue for the wealthy which is clearly untrue.

    Other than that she came off quite well in the interview. I still don't think she'd be a good candidate but that definitely improves her image IMO.
  • I Wear Pants
    jhay78;737217 wrote:It's so dead that's why Obama's spent millions to keep the issue out of the courts? So dead that the governor of Hawaii (Democrat) couldn't locate the long-form certificate in the state archives, despite his best of intentions to settle this thing once and for all? So dead that Chris Matthews (not your average right-wing nutcase) has asked why the Obama team hasn't produced the long-form certificate?

    As for Trump, I don't think he's pandering to anyone- I think those are his honest feelings on the issue, and when everyone else knows it's politically disastrous to be labeled a birther, Trump doesn't care.
    Because he hasn't. He's spend $2 million or so in legal fees since the campaign ended. In comparison John Mccain's campaign group has spen t $1.3 million on the same type of thing. So while I'm sure some has gone to defending lawsuits related to the topic to suggest that all of the money has gone towards that is simply untrue.

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/apr/12/donald-trump/donald-trump-claims-obama-has-spent-2-million-lega/
  • stlouiedipalma
    Is this another internet myth that so many like to use as gospel?
  • stlouiedipalma
    I Wear Pants;746786 wrote:Because he hasn't. He's spend $2 million or so in legal fees since the campaign ended. In comparison John Mccain's campaign group has spen t $1.3 million on the same type of thing. So while I'm sure some has gone to defending lawsuits related to the topic to suggest that all of the money has gone towards that is simply untrue.

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/apr/12/donald-trump/donald-trump-claims-obama-has-spent-2-million-lega/

    Are you saying that the whole "Obama has spent millions to keep from providing his birth certificate" argument is just another internet myth?
  • believer
    stlouiedipalma;747696 wrote:Are you saying that the whole "Obama has spent millions to keep from providing his birth certificate" argument is just another internet myth?
    Only if you believe that politifact.com is politically unbiased.
  • stlouiedipalma
    I understand your concern about politifact.com (you and writer seem to share a distain for all links but the ones you approve), but where are the undisputed links showing that Obama has spent millions in order to conceal his citizenship?
  • believer
    stlouiedipalma;749081 wrote:I understand your concern about politifact.com (you and writer seem to share a distain for all links but the ones you approve), but where are the undisputed links showing that Obama has spent millions in order to conceal his citizenship?
    Touché BUT there's absolutely no doubt in my mind the BHO, the DNC, etc. have spent plenty to dodge the question.
  • Writerbuckeye
    Whether it's a penny or a couple mill, the fact that he's spent ANYTHING, including effort by even one staffer, to deflect from providing all the documents from his past tells me he is hiding something.

    He hasn't released any of his transcripts or college work from several schools, along with the long form birth certificate. Why? Why keep putting people off instead of simply doing the easy thing and opening up the closed portion of his life? This makes no sense to me unless there's something he doesn't want found. I'm at the point I believe he was born in Hawaii but there's something else there (perhaps info on his father) he doesn't want out. Also, he doesn't want any of his college work opened up because it will show him to be a total LOON or it will raise questions about where he got scholarship money to attend these expensive schools, and it would open him up to all kinds of questions on whether he still believes that way.

    Just a guess about our "most transparent" president in history.
  • I Wear Pants
    believer;748729 wrote:Only if you believe that politifact.com is politically unbiased.
    Politically unbiased has nothing to do with it. Do you dispute what they said?
  • believer
    I Wear Pants;749764 wrote:Politically unbiased has nothing to do with it. Do you dispute what they said?
    Let's just say I'll accept it with a generous portion of salt.
  • I Wear Pants
    What do you dispute about it?

    Mccain's campaign has also spent at least a million after the campaign and I'd wager they had a whole lot less business to take care of. So what seems so strange that Obama's campaign would spend the $2 million figure?
  • Writerbuckeye
    I Wear Pants;750260 wrote:What do you dispute about it?

    Mccain's campaign has also spent at least a million after the campaign and I'd wager they had a whole lot less business to take care of. So what seems so strange that Obama's campaign would spend the $2 million figure?

    The issue is larger than the money. It's the secrecy. A guy who talks about transparency in his campaign ironically (or not) is the least transparent president in history. He needs to release all the documents and records from his schooling (up to and including universities), his passport, and anything else that's being questioned. Just release it and show you're not hiding anything.

    He won't of course -- because he IS hiding something.
  • stlouiedipalma
    I still want to see the link which absolutely proves that Obama has spent millions to keep his birth information a secret.

    Not a "guess", but a link.

    Not a link to an opinion or another guess, but PROOF.

    If you cannot provide it, then all you have is speculation and another internet myth.
  • stlouiedipalma
    Writerbuckeye;750300 wrote:The issue is larger than the money. It's the secrecy. A guy who talks about transparency in his campaign ironically (or not) is the least transparent president in history. He needs to release all the documents and records from his schooling (up to and including universities), his passport, and anything else that's being questioned. Just release it and show you're not hiding anything.

    He won't of course -- because he IS hiding something.

    Would you have all candidates jump through your hoops to prove who they are? If so you're no better than all those other birther crazies out there.


    How is this any different from those societies who demanded that people provide their "papers" to the authorities?
  • I Wear Pants
    Writerbuckeye;750300 wrote:The issue is larger than the money. It's the secrecy. A guy who talks about transparency in his campaign ironically (or not) is the least transparent president in history. He needs to release all the documents and records from his schooling (up to and including universities), his passport, and anything else that's being questioned. Just release it and show you're not hiding anything.

    He won't of course -- because he IS hiding something.

    First, let me say that I am disappointed in the lack of transparency from the Obama administration. However, he's certainly not the least transparent president in history.

    And second, even if he would release all of that it's not like any of this would stop because many of the people demanding to see them would cry that they're fake or somehow invalid. It's a lose/lose either way.

    What in the hell would he be hiding anyway?