Archive

Disgusted With Obama Administration.

  • jhay78
    I Wear Pants;995213 wrote:You also don't care for those people who have been found to be on death row wrongfully many years after their conviction.

    And where is the part about people dying in the constitution?
    Alluded to in the 5th Amendment: "No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process . . . "

    Also

    http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=003096
    1775

    Death Penalty Used in All 13 US Colonies at Outbreak of American Revolution
    By the start of the American Revolution, the death penalty was used in all 13 colonies. Rhode Island was the only colony that did not have at least 10 crimes punishable by death. The colonies had "roughly comparable death statutes which covered arson, piracy, treason, murder, sodomy, burglary, robbery, rape, horse-stealing, slave rebellion, and often counterfeiting. Hanging was the usual sentence. Rhode Island was probably the only colony which decreased the number of capital crimes in the late 1700's." [RIGHT]Michael H. Reggio "History of the Death Penalty," Pbs.org (accessed Dec. 16, 2009)[/RIGHT]
    1787

    Founding Fathers Allow for Death Penalty When Writing Constitution
    "To most constitutional lawyers there seems little doubt that the Founding Fathers intended to allow for the death penalty in drawing up the US Constitution of 1787. Not only did certain provisions of the Constitution - such as the Fifth Amendment - expressly allow for the taking of life, but others - such as the Eighth Amendment - were deliberately phrased in ambigious ways that suggested even if certain forms of punishment could be banned (such as crucifixions or beheadings) the basic principle of government executions remained permissible if individual states and the federal government wished to legislate for these."
  • jhay78
    I Wear Pants;996033 wrote:In hindsight I shouldn't have brought that up. But you guys really don't want to get into the punishment that the bible allows. Not applicable to civilized culture.
    I think we can all agree that some instances of the death penalty in the OT do not fit our cultural framework, nor are they advocated for in the NT by Jesus and his disciples. And you'll be hard pressed to find preachers calling for Sabbath-violators to get the death penalty. The quote from Romans above is a good "last word" from the Bible about capital punishment.
  • BGFalcons82
    Here's America, 2011 - "Somebody needs to pay for all my children."

    http://nation.foxnews.com/homelessness/2011/12/01/homeless-lady-15-kids-somebody-needs-pay-all-my-children

    How did we get to here? When did personal responsibility get run over with a Mack truck? I have much sympathy for the children, but their mother and fathers have no clue about common sense, parenthood, responsiblity and accountability. Unfortunately, she's not alone in her demands for other people's money because she can't control herself.
  • sleeper
    BGFalcons82;996559 wrote:Here's America, 2011 - "Somebody needs to pay for all my children."

    http://nation.foxnews.com/homelessness/2011/12/01/homeless-lady-15-kids-somebody-needs-pay-all-my-children

    How did we get to here? When did personal responsibility get run over with a Mack truck? I have much sympathy for the children, but their mother and fathers have no clue about common sense, parenthood, responsiblity and accountability. Unfortunately, she's not alone in her demands for other people's money because she can't control herself.
    This is something I don't blame Obama for. This country has become more and more entitled and consequently more and more stupid over the years.
  • BGFalcons82
    sleeper;996601 wrote:This is something I don't blame Obama for. This country has become more and more entitled and consequently more and more stupid over the years.
    I didn't say it was Obama's fault. But I will say he represents those that desire to further spread the entitlement mentality and create people that look to the government for their economic salvation instead of:

    1. Holding the children's fathers responsible
    2. Holding themselves responsible
    3. Being accountable for their own choices AND consequences.

    My initial question was somewhat rhetorical, however people only have to look at when government started to become the provider instead of the family. Obama would like to provide even more if there were enough of Iggy's trees to print the greenbacks. ;)
  • tk421
    too bad that after we are finally leaving Iraq, the war on terror is coming to the U.S. Senate voting to declare the U.S. a combat zone, guess they need something to occupy all these soldiers when they return home.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    tk421;998621 wrote:too bad that after we are finally leaving Iraq, the war on terror is coming to the U.S. Senate voting to declare the U.S. a combat zone, guess they need something to occupy all these soldiers when they return home.
    They can join BO in Hawaii for a 17 day vacay.....seriously is this guy intentionally trying to lose his office? The GOP has been lackluster (I'm still convinced Romney will get the nomination and make an honest effort in '12), but this is the most tone deaf and aloof administration ever.
  • I Wear Pants
    [video=youtube;U9MGOckIzlU][/video]
    Nothing to do with the Obama administration but let's lighten the mood.

    I lol'd at "I'm just some fucking guy"
  • QuakerOats
  • gut
    tk421;998621 wrote:too bad that after we are finally leaving Iraq, the war on terror is coming to the U.S.
    The new slogan can be "fight them here so we don't have to over there"
  • BGFalcons82
    gut;1006218 wrote:The new slogan can be "fight them here so we don't have to over there"
    Yeah, that way we can call it "Workplace Violence", like the Justice Dept is doing with Nidal Hasan...you remember...they guy that killed 13 unarmed soldiers at Ft. Hood, Texas. - http://nation.foxnews.com/ft-hood-shooting/2011/12/07/obama-regime-calls-ft-hood-shooting-workplace-violence

    Let's see if I have this right....the Democratically-controlled Senate wants to declare all of the United States as a battlefield, so as to ostensibly put the rights for all Americans covered under the Bill of Rights, into a coma. And now, the President wants to claim the actual terrorists aren't really on the battlefield and therefore ordinary criminals...subject to the protections and rights granted under our founding father's documents.

    What has happened to America?
  • believer
    BGFalcons82;1006406 wrote:What has happened to Amerika?
    fixed
  • I Wear Pants
    believer;1006771 wrote:fixed
    This is stupid.
  • believer
    I Wear Pants;1007556 wrote:This is stupid.
    Is there anything else you want to add, comrade?
  • Cleveland Buck
    In August 2008, as the world's leaders gathered in Beijing for the Olympic games, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, hot-headed and erratic, made his gamble for greatness.

    It began with a stunning artillery barrage on Tskhinvali, capital of tiny South Ossetia, a province that had broken free of Tbilisi when Tbilisi broke free of Russia. As Ossetians and Russian peacekeepers fell under the Georgian guns, terrified Ossetians fled into Russia.

    Saakashvili's blitzkrieg appeared to have triumphed.

    Until, that is, Russian armor, on Vladimir Putin's orders, came thundering down the Roki Tunnel into Ossetia, sending Saakashvili's army reeling. The Georgians were driven out of Ossetia and expelled from a second province that had broken free of Tbilisi: Abkhazia.

    The Russians then proceeded to bomb Tbilisi, capture Gori, birthplace of Josef Stalin, and bomb Georgian airfields rumored to be the forward bases for the Israelis in any pre-emptive strike on Iran.

    The humiliation of Saakashvili was total and brought an enraged and frustrated John McCain running to the microphones.

    "Today, we're all Georgians," bawled McCain.

    Well, not exactly.

    President Bush called Putin's response "disproportionate" and "brutal," but did nothing. Small nations that sucker-punch big powers do not get to dictate when the fisticuffs stop.

    What made this war of interest to Americans, however, was that Bush had long sought to bring Georgia into NATO. Only the resistance of Old Europe had prevented it.

    And had Georgia been a member of NATO when Saakashvili began his war, U.S. Marines and Special Forces might have been on the way to the Caucasus to confront Russian troops in a part of the world where there is no vital U.S. interest and never has been any U.S. strategic interest whatsoever.

    A U.S war with Russia – over Georgia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia – would have been an act of national criminal insanity.

    Days later, there came another startling discovery.

    McCain foreign-policy adviser Randy Scheunemann had been paid $290,000 by the Saakashvili regime, from January 2007 to March 2008, to get Georgia into NATO, and thus acquire a priceless U.S. war guarantee to fight on Georgia's side in any clash with Russia.

    What makes this history relevant today?

    Last week, Sen. Marco Rubio, rising star of the Republican right, on everyone's short list for VP, called for a unanimous vote, without debate, on a resolution directing President Obama to accept Georgia's plan for membership in NATO at the upcoming NATO summit in Chicago.

    Rubio was pushing to have the U.S. Senate pressure Obama into fast-tracking Georgia into NATO, making Tbilisi an ally the United States would be obligated by treaty to go to war to defend.


    Now it is impossible to believe a senator, not a year in office, dreamed this up himself. Some foreign agent of Scheunemann's ilk had to have had a role in drafting it.

    And for whose benefit is Rubio pushing to have his own countrymen committed to fight for a Georgia that, three years ago, started an unprovoked war with Russia? Who cooked up this scheme to involve Americans in future wars in the Caucasus that are none of our business?

    The answer is unknown. What is known is the name of the senator who blocked it – Rand Paul, son of Ron Paul, who alone stepped in and objected, defeating Rubio's effort to get a unanimous vote.

    The resolution was pulled. But these people will be back. They are indefatigable when it comes to finding ways to commit the blood of U.S. soldiers to their client regimes and ideological bedfellows.

    Back in 2008, however, as Bush was confining himself to protesting the excesses of Russia's response, his ex-U.N. ambassador was full of righteous rage and ready for military action.

    In the London Telegraph, Aug. 15, 2008, John Bolton declared that Russia had conducted an "invasion," that Georgia had been a "victim of aggression," that America had "fiddled while Georgia burned," that we had played the "paper tiger"when faced by the snarling Russian Bear.
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE...geId=%20375725

    We need a lot more Pauls in government and a lot fewer scum like Rubio, McCain, and Obama.
  • I Wear Pants
    believer;1007628 wrote:Is there anything else you want to add, comrade?
    You wouldn't know a communist if he/she punched you in the dick.

    Amerika, calling people comrade, etc is as stupid as someone today still pulling "Bush lied, people died" or other shit like that and thinking they are clever.
  • believer
    Lighten up, Karl. Have a great weekend! :thumbup:
  • BGFalcons82
    I swear, you just can't make this sh!t up - http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/dec/6/washington-doesnt-need-to-regulate-rain/

    The 9th Circus Court of Appeals is determined to make private landowners clean up their "toxic waste dumps" created by naturally occurring rain water run-off. If the Supremes don't take this case up, then farmers are next in the statist's cross-hairs.
  • fish82
    Cleveland Buck;1008568 wrote:http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE...geId= 375725

    We need a lot more Pauls in government and a lot fewer scum like Rubio, McCain, and Obama.
    This is good.
    And for whose benefit is Rubio pushing to have his own countrymen committed to fight for a Georgia that, three years ago, started an unprovoked war with Russia?
    LULZ :laugh:
  • Devils Advocate
    To President Obama and most 535 voting members of congress, it is now official — the majority of you are inept and corrupt morons:

    a. The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775. You have had 234 years to get it right and it is broke.

    b. Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 74 years to get it right and it is broke.

    c. Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 71 years to get it right and it is corrupt, broke and bankrupt.

    d. War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 45 years to get it right. $1 TRILLION of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to “the poor” and they only want more.

    e. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 44 years to get it right and they are both broke.

    f. Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 39 years to get it right and it is also completely corrupt and broke.

    g. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 32 years to get it right and it is another abysmal failure.

    You have FAILED in every “government service” you have shoved down our throats while overspending our tax dollars.

    We have lost our minds to “Political Correctness!”
  • Cleveland Buck
    Devils Advocate;1009121 wrote: You have FAILED in every “government service” you have shoved down our throats while overspending our tax dollars.

    We have lost our minds to “Political Correctness!”
    That is because government services always fail. Prices are supposed to tell people what to do. When prices mean nothing, like with government services, you are just stabbing in the dark. You will eventually fail every time.
  • sleeper
    I'd personally like to know if there are any federal programs that operate in the black. I fear I may already know the answer to this question.
  • jhay78
    Devils Advocate;1009121 wrote:To President Obama and most 535 voting members of congress, it is now official — the majority of you are inept and corrupt morons:

    a. The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775. You have had 234 years to get it right and it is broke.

    b. Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 74 years to get it right and it is broke.

    c. Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 71 years to get it right and it is corrupt, broke and bankrupt.

    d. War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 45 years to get it right. $1 TRILLION of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to “the poor” and they only want more.

    e. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 44 years to get it right and they are both broke.

    f. Freddie Mac was established in 1970. You have had 39 years to get it right and it is also completely corrupt and broke.

    g. The Department of Energy was created in 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil. It has ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year and we import more oil than ever before. You had 32 years to get it right and it is another abysmal failure.

    You have FAILED in every “government service” you have shoved down our throats while overspending our tax dollars.

    We have lost our minds to “Political Correctness!”
    Great post. Add to d) Food Stamps- began in 1939, made permanent in 1964, now has 45.8 million recipients. I guess the War on Poverty worked, right? :rolleyes:

    http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2011/11/01/some-15-of-u-s-uses-food-stamps/