Disgusted With Obama Administration.

• Manhattan Buckeye

  ptown_trojans_1;1228377 wrote:Yeah, the Government......

  Paid for by who?
• HitsRus

  

  The whole context for this quote is here.

  
  ...and that makes it even WORSE. Yeah, we are all in this together and that the American system is great( long before he took office incidentally)...and everybody is dependent on other people...and having a government that facilitates developments helps. But he states the obvious...the government SHOULD provide what the private sector can't....but that is not an excuse for meddling beyond that.
  
  Government exists at the consent of the people. It is not an excuse for continued interference or attempts to influence/takeover entire industries. It is not an excuse for legislation of elitist mandates. It is not an excuse for injecting his version of 'social justice' into a free market system thereby handicapping our products in global markets. Government exists to insure domestic tranquilty, and the free flow of commerce...not to incite class warfare or unnecessarily affect/meddle in markets.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  Footwedge;1228395 wrote:SMH. What exactly are you trying to prove with this little snippet? I mean really. You want to debate the subject then debate it. Your post here as as pathetic as I have ever seen on this board. Never any substance..at all. And this little pile you dumped on the grass proves it.
  
  Listen up, pal. Ford improved his business because he was able to create a demand. His ingeneous plan helped Americans develop into a middle class. There are no Henry Fords today. There are Mitt Romneys and others that would rather **** on the entire country, hide their money overseas, and then blame the political party in office. These political boards should be educational for those that occasionally frequent here...as they get a birdseye view on the mindset of some really sleezy and unpatriotic Americans. Ford didn't view human labor simply as a cost on a balance sheet....as many radical right wingers "businessmen" do including Rmoney. Where do you fall, slick?

  I fall in line with people that pay their taxes, obey laws and work hard - apparently not in the majority in our failing country currently.
  
  And I'm the bad guy. Interesting.
  
  What substance do you want to debate? American businesses are suffering under a great weight of regulation, red tape, impossible pension and retirement debts and government bureaucracy. We're getting our clock cleaned (proverbially) by Asia due to their lower costs of doing business. That's why I'm here. I'm an American, I'm at the American Club right now (tomorrow your time).
  
  What do you want to debate? Obama's economic record? No, seriously, I'm here. This is morning my time. I'd love to debate you.
• pmoney25

  

  HitsRus;1228428 wrote:...and that makes it even WORSE. Yeah, we are all in this together and that the American system is great( long before he took office incidentally)...and everybody is dependent on other people...and having a government that facilitates developments helps. But he states the obvious...the government SHOULD provide what the private sector can't....but that is not an excuse for meddling beyond that. Government exists at the consent of the people. It is not an excuse for continued interference or attempts to influence/takeover entire industries. It is not an excuse for legislation of elitist mandates. It is not an excuse for injecting his version of 'social justice' into a free market system thereby handicapping our products in global markets. Government exists to insure domestic tranquilty, and the free flow of commerce...not to incite class warfare or unnecessarily affect markets.

  
  Good post. Agree. Reps to you
• Footwedge

  Manhattan Buckeye;1228430 wrote: What substance do you want to debate? American businesses are suffering under a great weight of regulation, red tape, impossible pension and retirement debts and government bureaucracy. What do you want to debate? Obama's economic record? No, seriously, I'm here. This is morning my time. I'd love to debate you.

  We might be strangled by what you list....but we were 10 times more strangled when the regulations or banker cops were furloughed.
  
  Don't like the federal oversight on unbridled capitalism? Then don't steal, rob, thieve and plunder the wealth of the 90 percenters.
  
  We tried that crap...we saw all the Madoffs running wild....with the vast majority of them still roaming the streets. Scary stuff indeed.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  Federal oversight doesn't work if they are incompetent, or bought by a political party that together scratches each others backs. Nancy Pelosi isn't exactly the type of person that flies coach anywhere, and we've seen for the past 3 1/2 years how the Obamas enjoy their vacations.
• 0311sdp

  Obama's TV adds are ripping Romney (and some of it justifiably so) forsending jobs overseas, have any of you looked back at Obama's voting record while in the Senate to see what kind of legislation he supported? The pot is calling the kettle black (no pun intended) Obama has had 4 years to do a lot of the things that he says he will do now and has done nothing to help the economy, nothing to help the failing medicare and social security system, done nothing to end the middle east war (moving troops from Iraq to Afghanistan is not bringing them home). He instead has at the least Quadrupled the National Debt, raised hidden taxes on many of the commodities that people buy everyday, forced a terrible Healthcare system that most don't want and the coutry can't afford and now says he will put the construction workers back to work building highways and bridges. I'm not the brightest guy around but where will the money come from for that project? It can only come from 1of 2 places 1) Higher taxes 2) Higher debt, which of these great options do you choose? I'm don't like Romney and I don't think that he will be any better than Obama in solving the countries many issues, but we have already seen in the past 4 years that Obama can't do the job so at least give someone else a shot. There are those who say (Obama) that Bush and the Republicans had things so screwed up that no one could fix it in 4 years. To that I say Bull----. Who idividually is better off under Obama than Bush? Not many, maybe some illegal aliens and lazy F------ who don't want to work, but the working man certainly is not. Obama will win re-election, I have no doubt about that, he has too much money to spend (about a billion dollars) on negative campaign adds and such. Surprisingly these things work (because people are not informed and believe everything they hear on TV). I can say with reasonable certainty that after 4 more years of Obama the debt will be so high that we may never get out from under it and because of the debt the economy will continue to be slow. As I said earlier I don't think it will make a huge difference who wins in November but a message needs to be sent that if you make a bunch of promises and keep none of them that you will be a one term President. We need to hold our Senators and House members to the same standard. If things don't improve start voting those People out. A couple point that must be conceded to President Obama is that he may be the most charismatic President I've ever seen and the guy knows how to run a campaign.
• I Wear Pants

  BGFalcons82;1226072 wrote:To claim that roads, bridges, public education, etc. make small businesses what they are is ludicrous if not a form of brainwashing the uneducated. These things are wonderful to have, but they DO NOT make small businesses what they are.
  
  Regarding "modern society", how in the hell did Ford get his car company off the ground without any of this wonderful government aid? The Wright Brothers were working on a government entitlement program 110 years ago? Where was their electricity, sidewalks, public roads, etc? How in the hell did we ever live through the first 2 centuries of this country without government intrusion? I'm not picking on you, but the idea that the government is directly responsible for successful businesses is unfathomable. Yet, here we are discussing it as Warren and Soetoro have said it is so.

  We had fucking roads and libraries and schools during the time of Ford. Bridges too.
  
  Who the fuck ever said "directly responsible" or mostly responsible or any other variant. All that has been said is that the idea that anyone "pulls themselves up by their own bootstraps" isn't true. It does not happen. That in no way takes away from the great ideas, work, and companies that people have and build.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  ^^^
  
  It wasn't just what was said, but how it was said. As I stated earlier, it was all about what "you" did (note, not Obama), it was arguably the worst gaffe in his term, and he's had several. It was so stupid even the WaPo is calling him out on it.
• believer

  

  Manhattan Buckeye;1228546 wrote:Federal oversight doesn't work if they are incompetent, or bought by a political party that together scratches each others backs. Nancy Pelosi isn't exactly the type of person that flies coach anywhere, and we've seen for the past 3 1/2 years how the Obamas enjoy their vacations.

  good points
• BoatShoes

  0311sdp;1228621 wrote:Obama's TV adds are ripping Romney (and some of it justifiably so) forsending jobs overseas, have any of you looked back at Obama's voting record while in the Senate to see what kind of legislation he supported? The pot is calling the kettle black (no pun intended) Obama has had 4 years to do a lot of the things that he says he will do now and has done nothing to help the economy, nothing to help the failing medicare and social security system, done nothing to end the middle east war (moving troops from Iraq to Afghanistan is not bringing them home). He instead has at the least Quadrupled the National Debt, raised hidden taxes on many of the commodities that people buy everyday, forced a terrible Healthcare system that most don't want and the coutry can't afford and now says he will put the construction workers back to work building highways and bridges. I'm not the brightest guy around but where will the money come from for that project? It can only come from 1of 2 places 1) Higher taxes 2) Higher debt, which of these great options do you choose? I'm don't like Romney and I don't think that he will be any better than Obama in solving the countries many issues, but we have already seen in the past 4 years that Obama can't do the job so at least give someone else a shot.

  Have you seen how bad investors want to lend money to the federal government right now? If Mitt Romney ran the United States the way he ran companies he bought at Bain Capital, he would be borrowing to the hilt right now as the money is basically free. You're concerned about the National Debt but if we got to full employment it wouldn't be a problem. Japan has twice the debt we have as a percentage of GDP and are still able to borrow at very low rates.
• QuakerOats

  BoatShoes;1228812 wrote: You're concerned about the National Debt but if we got to full employment it wouldn't be a problem.

  We cannot get to full employment (as we essentially had under Bush) when you have a regime attacking a capitalist economy from all sides with socialist/marxist policies. Yes, we do have historic low interest rates, but the economy sucks - -why, because no one in their right mind is willing to risk any capital with the clowns now running the show - period! How many times do we have to cover the same material?
• QuakerOats

  BAD TO WORSE...
  Jobless claims surge...
  REPORT: Foreclosure crisis hits older blacks, Hispanics hardest...
  Factory activity contracts...
  Home sales drop 5.4%, fewest since October...
  Grocery bills on rise as corn prices near record highs...
• pmoney25

  

  Haha you can't blame corn prices on Obama. I dislike the guy as president but that is reaching.
• I Wear Pants

  pmoney25;1229146 wrote:Haha you can't blame corn prices on Obama. I dislike the guy as president but that is reaching.

  Nor really things that are the result of the housing bubble. The housing market is not coming back and people need to realize that.
• fish82

  

  I Wear Pants;1229168 wrote:Nor really things that are the result of the housing bubble. The housing market is not coming back and people need to realize that.

  It won't be what it was circa 2006/7, (nor should it be) but it'll be back to some degree of normalcy within a couple more years.
• QuakerOats

  http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/19/usda-partnering-with-mexico-to-boost-food-stamp-participation/
  
  
  Are we in the twilight zone or something ............... just bizarre !!!!!!!!!
• elitesmithie05

  I find it interesting that Black Americans Unemployment has doubled since BO took office yet he will still garner 97% of their vote...
• BoatShoes

  QuakerOats;1228986 wrote:We cannot get to full employment (as we essentially had under Bush) when you have a regime attacking a capitalist economy from all sides with socialist/marxist policies. Yes, we do have historic low interest rates, but the economy sucks - -why, because no one in their right mind is willing to risk any capital with the clowns now running the show - period! How many times do we have to cover the same material?

  We're probably going to have to cover the material again because no business man worth his salt would be so afraid of the skinny lawyer not to risk their capital if there was demand for the products. Take Apple for example; despite an overall lack of demand in the economy their has been strong demand for their new products throughout the Obama presidency and they have not been afraid of his socialist regime. American entrepreneurs who see an opportunity to meet a demand don't hold back in fear of an incompetent buffoon who's never run a lemonade stand.
• jhay78

  

  BoatShoes;1229498 wrote:We're probably going to have to cover the material again because no business man worth his salt would be so afraid of the skinny lawyer not to risk their capital if there was demand for the products. Take Apple for example; despite an overall lack of demand in the economy their has been strong demand for their new products throughout the Obama presidency and they have not been afraid of his socialist regime. American entrepreneurs who see an opportunity to meet a demand don't hold back in fear of an incompetent buffoon who's never run a lemonade stand.

  Apple seems to me to be a rare exception- worldwide demand for cutting-edge products. That's not even close to representative of 99% of businesses (especially small ones) and corporations in this country.
• BoatShoes

  jhay78;1229518 wrote:Apple seems to me to be a rare exception- worldwide demand for cutting-edge products. That's not even close to representative of 99% of businesses (especially small ones) and corporations in this country.

  I don't think we disagree. There is not enough demand to warrant investing generally. Lack of Demand is holding us back not fear of Barry Saetoro. I was pointing out that despite the socialist/marxist in the white house Apple is not afraid to risk their capital because there is demand for their products.
• I Wear Pants

  Nor is say Microsoft afraid to risk their capitol. Hell they just had a Q4 report where they had a $6.2 billion goodwill write off for an ad company they had purchased I think two years ago. I don't buy the assertion that once anyone but the evil marxist Obama gets into the White House that magically companies will thrust open their checkbooks and invest in the American working man and the American economy. That's a bunch of bs.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  I Wear Pants;1229531 wrote:Nor is say Microsoft afraid to risk their capitol. Hell they just had a Q4 report where they had a $6.2 billion goodwill write off for an ad company they had purchased I think two years ago. I don't buy the assertion that once anyone but the evil marxist Obama gets into the White House that magically companies will thrust open their checkbooks and invest in the American working man and the American economy. That's a bunch of bs.

  Certainly nothing magical will happen - we found that out in '08. What might happen is the government just gets the hell out of the way, if nothing else it is a good start.
• I Wear Pants

  Manhattan Buckeye;1229542 wrote:Certainly nothing magical will happen - we found that out in '08. What might happen is the government just gets the hell out of the way, if nothing else it is a good start.

  Yeah but then we start doing slightly better in other areas (maybe) and Romney pisses away those gains on a bigger Pentagon budget (how it's even possible to spend more than we already do in that area I don't even know. Spinners for all the Humvees maybe?) and other GOP pet projects.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  Deserves its own thread, but wow, what an AP fail:
  
  http://news.yahoo.com/venture-funding-heats-2q-hitting-7-billion-040254816--finance.html