posted by CenterBHSFan
As far as searching for keywords maga and trump goes, you've got a good point. But it does not follow that buying religious texts fits into that nothing burger. If by buying religious texts lumps you into any kind of extremists or target of the govt - Books A Million would be a hub of terrorism.
Not sure that's the whole story, though. And while they've probably not disclosed all the details, but apparently the searches were for transactions in and around DC on Jan. 6th. Seems, also, that cooperation was voluntary.
I don't think it's black & white, but is this really any different than cops going to a business asking to see what their cameras might have recorded? The financial transactions would let them know who was in the DC area that day, and then they could match names to faces they had on camera. And to the extent they already had names, they would be within their rights for a warrant for those records.
"Religious and political extremist views" seems like it might be hyperbole. It's more likely that the type of transactions they looked for are transactions that are correlated with people attending that rally. So if you were there visiting the Smithsonian that day, you wouldn't be flagged. But if QO was there buying a MAGA shirt from a vendor at the rally, he'd get flagged.
Maybe we'll learn more if there are coming Congressional hearings. But Republicans should tread carefully, because at the end of the day the rioters ARE criminals, and they certainly aren't opposed to these tactics in other scenarios.
It is the sort of thing that demands oversight, but I don't think we know nearly enough to form an opinion if it was overreach or not, at this point.