CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
7,259
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
posted by cbus4life
Seen Fox News, and of course Trump, going on about fictional illegal voting, so the right has their bases covered as well.
Just pointing out the irony of me watching something from MSNBC and you watching FOX lol!
Also, the same clip I watched had something about vote hacking in Georgia as well.
friendfromlowry
Senior Member
7,778
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
friendfromlowry
Senior Member
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
7,259
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
CenterBHSFan
333 - I'm only half evil
Sarah Haider @SarahTheHaider
FollowFollow @SarahTheHaider
More
I know there is a lot coming from the left that is disheartening (to say the least). But please, *please* vote for the Dems tomorrow. There is so much at stake in this election. Vote, and be counted as among those who took a stand.
https://twitter.com/SarahTheHaider/status/1059696669363712000
Seeing all sorts of tweets like this today. "I know they're bad, but vote for them anyway! ;D "
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
9,465
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
iclfan2
Reppin' the 330/216/843
posted by friendfromlowry
I hope Ted Cruz loses.
Beto is pretty terrible for Texas
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
Comments on that tweet are interesting.
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
posted by friendfromlowry
I hope Ted Cruz loses.
With the money pouring in from all over the country for Beto, I hope he (Beto) loses and a few other close races for the Dems are lost (McCaskill in MO). The infighting will be epic.
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
8,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
posted by Spock
Pollsters are starting to pull predictions and backtrack. Not good for dems. Also news reports that polls were heavy early this morning. Not good for dems. Their voting base doesn't get up till noon.
Nope. I'm still seeing the Ds have an 85% chance of taking the House and the Rs a 85% chance of keeping the Senate.
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
8,068
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
posted by ptown_trojans_1
Nope. I'm still seeing the Ds have an 85% chance of taking the House and the Rs a 85% chance of keeping the Senate.
Is there reason to believe that these predictions will be any more accurate than those of two years ago?
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
8,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
posted by queencitybuckeye
Is there reason to believe that these predictions will be any more accurate than those of two years ago?
Yeah. They are not predictive, they are probabilistic. 538 has been pretty damn clear that just because it is 85% does not mean it is certain. A 15% chance of Rs keeping the House is not outside the realm of possibility. That is one of the many lessons of 2016 and that people took 85% to mean it is going to happen, when in reality, that 15% did occur.
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
8,068
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
queencitybuckeye
Senior Member
posted by ptown_trojans_1
Yeah. They are not predictive, they are probabilistic. 538 has been pretty damn clear that just because it is 85% does not mean it is certain. A 15% chance of Rs keeping the House is not outside the realm of possibility. That is one of the many lessons of 2016 and that people took 85% to mean it is going to happen, when in reality, that 15% did occur.
IOW, when it goes against either or both of these probabilities, they can claim not to have been wrong.
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
8,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
29,228
posts
Joined
Apr 2010
like_that
1st Team All-PWN
posted by queencitybuckeye
IOW, when it goes against either or both of these probabilities, they can claim not to have been wrong.
Pretty much this. Silver has it good.
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
8,788
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
ptown_trojans_1
Moderator
posted by like_that
Pretty much this. Silver has it good.
That he does. But, I think he does a good job at calling out pundits for their BS.
ernest_t_bass
12th Son of the Lama
26,698
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
ernest_t_bass
12th Son of the Lama
Each year I care less and less about politics. Each year I think I feel kinda better about feeling less and less about politics.
kizer permanente
Senior Member
1,309
posts
Joined
Aug 2017
kizer permanente
Senior Member
Just saw an exit poll question of “do you think we need more women representation in office” and it was of course lopsidedly high. But who’s going to say no and look like a sexist to a stranger? That’s a terrible question if you’re actually looking for useful information.
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
posted by kizer permanente
Just saw an exit poll question of “do you think we need more women representation in office” and it was of course lopsidedly high. But who’s going to say no and look like a sexist to a stranger? That’s a terrible question if you’re actually looking for useful information.
I would've said no out of spite. I like playing the heel in these matters.
justincredible
Honorable Admin
37,969
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
justincredible
Honorable Admin
Finally got a chance to vote tonight. Lady wearing a yard sign as a vest, asking everyone walking into the polling location if they want the list of all democrat candidates annoyed me. Also, finding the same list sitting in my voting booth was cool. When I put my ballot in the machine it registered an error because I didn't vote for every race, was supposed to kick the ballot back and allow me to click "Cast ballot". Ballot never came back so I'm not 100% sure my vote was even registered.
So, yeah, I love voting.
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
39,070
posts
Joined
Nov 2009
SportsAndLady
Senior Member
Is Illinois the only state where they don’t check IDs to vote? I brought my ID both this morning and for the presidential elections in ‘16 and neither time they asked to see my ID.
I could have casted 500 votes today if I really wanted to.