The *UNOFFICIAL* Massillon 2012 Thread

• rmolin73

  

  Impressive write ups skank thanks for the info. You guys look to be loaded this year.
• skank

  

  No problem. Loaded at the skilled positions, yeah kind of. A pretty solid O-line too, but depth at the O-line position is, I would say a weakness.
• Al Bundy

  rmolin73;1226877 wrote:Impressive write ups skank thanks for the info. You guys look to be loaded this year.

  We are absolutely loaded this year in Massillon. It would be a major upset if we don't run the table this season. Many things have fallen into place to allow us to assemble our dream team.
• rmolin73

  

  skank;1227103 wrote:No problem. Loaded at the skilled positions, yeah kind of. A pretty solid O-line too, but depth at the O-line position is, I would say a weakness.

  That has been our problem for a few years loaded at the skill and lean in the o-line. I think this maybe the first year in about 4 that we have any real depth on our line.
• skank

  

  For some reason in Massillon since about 2004, we can't seem to get any big linemen. Sure, we'll get kids that weigh 240, 250, 260, but they're all 6'0". Same thing goes for Basketball over here, our starting center the last 6-7 years has probably averaged 6'3", and that may be on the generous side. Not very big for a DI school.
• Gardens35

  I voted.
• skank

  

  Al Bundy;1227124 wrote:We are absolutely loaded this year in Massillon. It would be a major upset if we don't run the table this season. Many things have fallen into place to allow us to assemble our dream team.

  
  
  Apparently, this kind of thing isn't frowned upon after all like it was rumored to be during the big rule enforcement lecture earlier this summer.
  
  Good to know....Good to know.
• Al Bundy

  skank;1227784 wrote:Apparently, this kind of thing isn't frowned upon after all like it was rumored to be during the big rule enforcement lecture earlier this summer.
  
  Good to know....Good to know.

  I didn't break any rules. I was simply replying to rmolin in regards to the upcoming season for our Massillon Tigers.
• GoChiefs

  

  skank;1227784 wrote:Apparently, this kind of thing isn't frowned upon after all like it was rumored to be during the big rule enforcement lecture earlier this summer.
  
  Good to know....Good to know.

  
  Correct. Showing support for a school, without breaking any rules, isn't frowned upon.
  
  Carry on...
• skank

  

  This was a private message to me when I did the EXACT same thing....And used the EXACT same words that our friend Bundy used.
  
  
  GoChiefs
  
  
  
  
  [INDENT] You're going to keep trying to push the envelope, and all its going to get you is banned from the high school forums. You are pretty dang close to being there.
  
  
  
  Why is it ok for him? You admit that you know he's not a Massillon fan, and he says things like "assembled". We all know what he means.
  [/INDENT]
• Al Bundy

  skank;1228349 wrote:This was a private message to me when I did the EXACT same thing....And used the EXACT same words that our friend Bundy used.
  
  
  GoChiefs
  
  
  
  [INDENT] You're going to keep trying to push the envelope, and all its going to get you is banned from the high school forums. You are pretty dang close to being there.
  
  
  
  Why is it ok for him? You admit that you know he's not a Massillon fan, and he says things like "assembled". We all know what he means.
  [/INDENT]

  700-some schools are assembling football teams to play in the fall. What word you prefer that I use?
• GoChiefs

  

  skank;1228349 wrote:This was a private message to me when I did the EXACT same thing....And used the EXACT same words that our friend Bundy used.

  Incorrect. Had you been smart enough to do it like your friend Bundy does, nothing would have been done of your post either. Why would I give a crap if you post something positive about Mooney or Ursuline? You make no sense. You're reaching with your "mods are out to get me" thing now. Way to derail your own thread...again. I can't do anything just because you ASSUME you know what he means by "assembled". Doesn't every school assemble a football team?
• skank

  

  I know what you're doing.
  
  Some mods are innocently ignorant to what you are doing.
  Some mods know what you're doing, but allow you to do it anyway.
  
  But I know what you're doing.
• skank

  

  Here was another PM to me from you. Notice the highlighted portion.
  
  
  Massillon does hold a combine, and his talk about "bringing in kids" is talking about bringing kids to the combine. Not against the rules. Yes, I know it's an act, and I dislike it as much as you do. But, he's not breaking any rules, and until he does, I can't do anything about it. As for my "job", thanks, I do it just fine. From 10:30 pm to 6:30 am at the Timken Company. Thanks for your concern about me doing my job, but, that's really none of your concern. Forget about the past? I don't care about the past. You're the only one that seems to not be able to get over **** with the constant crying about past warnings and what not, not me.
  
  In the previous post, you say, "you assume you know what he means by "assembled", but in the pm to me....YOU assume you know what he means when he says, "bringing in kids".
  
  
  
  Also, notice where you say you know what he's doing.
• skank

  

  GoChiefs;1228363 wrote:Incorrect. Had you been smart enough to do it like your friend Bundy does, nothing would have been done of your post either. Why would I give a crap if you post something positive about Mooney or Ursuline? You make no sense. You're reaching with your "mods are out to get me" thing now. Way to derail your own thread...again. I can't do anything just because you ASSUME you know what he means by "assembled". Doesn't every school assemble a football team?

  
  
  If I...."Had been smart enough to do it like your friend bundy does, nothing would have been done of your post either".
  
  
  
  Really? Really?
  
  This is the last post I made before I received the PM with the ban threat.
  
  
  I think you misunderstand what I'm saying. All I'm saying, is that with all the kids that Ursuline and Mooney bring in, 99.9% of them are good kids, and the two schools have a history of bringing in high character kids. This just proves that even the schools that bring in large quantities of kids are going to miss one or two here and there and bring in a kid who's character isn't up to par on what they are accustomed to bringing in....That's all. It's not a slam on Ursuline or Mooney for that matter, they have GREAT track records of bringing in high quality kids....Kudos to them. I would even go as far as to say that the time the kids spend at the two schools once they're brought in, makes them even higher quality human beings in the long run.
  
  Where is the negative?
• GoChiefs

  

  skank;1228366 wrote:I know what you're doing.
  
  Some mods are innocently ignorant to what you are doing.
  Some mods know what you're doing, but allow you to do it anyway.
  
  But I know what you're doing.

  Care to explain what I'm doing?
• skank

  

  Or, you could just show the post where I broke a rule to receive a warning.
• skank

  

  GoChiefs;1228383 wrote:Care to explain what I'm doing?

  
  
  That was meant for your pal bundy. Couldn't figure that one out?
• GoChiefs

  

  skank;1228372 wrote:Here was another PM to me from you. Notice the highlighted portion.
  
  
  Massillon does hold a combine, and his talk about "bringing in kids" is talking about bringing kids to the combine. Not against the rules. Yes, I know it's an act, and I dislike it as much as you do. But, he's not breaking any rules, and until he does, I can't do anything about it. As for my "job", thanks, I do it just fine. From 10:30 pm to 6:30 am at the Timken Company. Thanks for your concern about me doing my job, but, that's really none of your concern. Forget about the past? I don't care about the past. You're the only one that seems to not be able to get over **** with the constant crying about past warnings and what not, not me.
  
  In the previous post, you say, "you assume you know what he means by "assembled", but in the pm to me....YOU assume you know what he means when he says, "bringing in kids".
  
  
  
  Also, notice where you say you know what he's doing.

  I do know what he's doing. As I stated, I don't like it either. Again, as I highlighted, HE'S NOT BREAKING ANY RULES, SO I CAN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. How hard is that for you to understand??? Don't get upset because he can troll smarter than you. He's trolling within the rules. Come cry when he breaks a rule.
  
  Continue thread derailing in 3, 2, 1....
• GoChiefs

  

  skank;1228386 wrote:That was meant for your pal bundy. Couldn't figure that one out?

  Well when it follows my post, why would I think it was meant for Bundy? Smh.
• skank

  

  Post 186....That's the tough one to answer....Quit dodging it.
• GoChiefs

  

  skank;1228390 wrote:Post 186....That's the tough one to answer....Quit dodging it.

  Nah, not tough, just figure I'll take the skank way out and ignore it. :thumbup: Quit whining.
• Al Bundy

  skank;1228366 wrote:I know what you're doing.
  
  Some mods are innocently ignorant to what you are doing.
  Some mods know what you're doing, but allow you to do it anyway.
  
  But I know what you're doing.

  I'm not even sure that you know what you are doing most of the time. I am just a Massillon fan with high hopes for this season. I honestly don't see anyone in the state that can compete with us. Thanks for posting those write-ups regarding some of the studs that will be part of the 2012 State Champion Massillon Tigers. We are lucky to have them in Tigertown.
• skank

  

  GoChiefs;1228394 wrote:Nah, not tough, just figure I'll take the skank way out and ignore it. :thumbup: Quit whining.

  
  
  Not surprising....AT ALL.
• GoChiefs

  

  skank;1228399 wrote:Not surprising....AT ALL.

  Well, I was ignoring it just because I didn't want to have to explain...but...
  

  skank;1228381 wrote:If I...."Had been smart enough to do it like your friend bundy does, nothing would have been done of your post either".
  
  
  
  Really? Really?
  
  This is the last post I made before I received the PM with the ban threat.
  
  
  I think you misunderstand what I'm saying. All I'm saying, is that with all the kids that Ursuline and Mooney bring in, 99.9% of them are good kids, and the two schools have a history of bringing in high character kids. This just proves that even the schools that bring in large quantities of kids are going to miss one or two here and there and bring in a kid who's character isn't up to par on what they are accustomed to bringing in....That's all. It's not a slam on Ursuline or Mooney for that matter, they have GREAT track records of bringing in high quality kids....Kudos to them. I would even go as far as to say that the time the kids spend at the two schools once they're brought in, makes them even higher quality human beings in the long run.
  
  Where is the negative?

  ...since you requested, I'll go ahead and answer it since you can't tell the difference. As you highlighted, so I didn't think I had to explain, when Bundy brought up "bringing kids in", he brought up "bringing kids in" to the COMBINE. Which is what happens. YOU BRING KIDS IN TO A COMBINE. He's not talking about recruiting.
  
  Your post talks about "bringing kids in" to the TEAM, you know, that you RECRUITED the kids to the team.
  
  If you can't see the difference, well, I can't help you any further. Troll smarter and there will be no issues.