Ohio Chatter DEV

GoChiefs

rmolin73;998813 wrote:It must suck for skank to see teams winning state titles on his home field. He is happy that they are moving to Columbus.

Perhaps thats why he was drinking?

rmolin73

As well as fantasizing about "The Ghey Sex".

skank

genghis dong;998699 wrote:I would have responded faster but I was just finishing up with your mom. She said I'm way better than your dad.

This?

skank

genghis dong;998713 wrote:I was hitting it for a while. She just started nagging me around then (stop talking to my homo son and stuff like that) so I had to shoot in her face.

This?

skank

genghis dong;998732 wrote:Your mom is going to get it now.

This?

skank

genghis dong;998736 wrote:You should know all about that. Does thinthick make you swallow or are you allowed to spit? Cause when I'm done with your mom I make that bitch swallow.

Or this? Please tell me exactly which one of these "schooled" me? Because if we live in a society, where THIS kind of stuff is schooling someone, well, that's just a sad state of affairs.

genghis dong

skank;998853 wrote:Or this? Please tell me exactly which one of these "schooled" me? Because if we live in a society, where THIS kind of stuff is schooling someone, well, that's just a sad state of affairs.

You should be on the how to be an annoying douche thread. You have that market cornered.

Dean Wormer

skank;998717 wrote:Tainted.

The only taint you are familiar with is that little spot between thicky's balls and a-hole.

genghis dong

Watching the Marion Local game. They need to be moved out of D6. It's not fair.

GoChiefs

skank;998853 wrote:Or this? Please tell me exactly which one of these "schooled" me? Because if we live in a society, where THIS kind of stuff is schooling someone, well, that's just a sad state of affairs.

No, these. You "schooled" yourself by thinking these "jokes" were even a little bit funny or clever.

"Oh look at me! I'm gonna make a joke about a priest and a boy, that'll get 'em! I've never told one of those before!"

skank;998747 wrote:Coincidently, the routines of priests are getting stale also. "Bark like a....puppy for me".

skank;998737 wrote:Catholics are better people you say? I wonder what you priest would say if he read this? Let me guess, he woulod say, "stay away from his mom dong....bang his little brother, but stay away from his mom".

Cum to think of it, I bet that's how you got your name, dong, is that an altar boy nickname?

skank;998735 wrote:Oh yeah, give it to her hard dong.

skank;998733 wrote:Which coincidently, makes your mom gay too.

skank;998731 wrote:Well, that and sucking lots of cock.

skank;998725 wrote:I may not be funny, but I've owned your simple ass tonight,,,,And I'm drunk off my ass.

skank;998716 wrote:Confirmation, your mom just told me you DO screw like a 14 year old....Wait....How would she know....You devil you.

skank;998707 wrote:Don't get horny catholic boy, I said you screw LIKE a 14 year old....Not you screw a 14 year old.

skank;998703 wrote:So, you posted this trash at 11:09, and your previous post was at 11:04, either my mom is DAMN good, my dad is Damn bad, or you screw like a 14 year old.

skank;998697 wrote:A professional what? You know molesting young boys is not considered a profession.

skank;998689 wrote:GET YOUR ASS BACK UNDER SHERMS DESK RIGHT NOW. And do like he said and call him Father sherman. Oh yeah....thats right. oh yeah, just like that....Who's your....FATHER?

skank;998681 wrote:Come to think of it, if during confession , the priest gave YOU a lap dance, you might be a catholic.

skank;998679 wrote:If during confession, you gave the priest a lap dance, you might ba a catholic.

skank;998678 wrote:If your school RECRUITED Jerry Sandusky to coach, you might be a catholic.

skank;998675 wrote:But for 144 pages, you and the other priest bait have told us that parochial schools are better than that. If you recruit, and you condone fucking little boys in the ass," you might be a catholic".

skank

Ah, here's the A #1 hypocrite on this site, always playing the, "you have to beat the best to be the best" card, yet earlier on thyis site made the comment that, "luckily, we were able to drop to DII in 2007". Luckily? So....do you want to play the best or not?

Dean Wormer

skank;999063 wrote:Ah, here's the A #1 hypocrite on this site, always playing the, "you have to beat the best to be the best" card, yet earlier on thyis site made the comment that, "luckily, we were able to drop to DII in 2007". Luckily? So....do you want to play the best or not?

No, you would be the #1 HYPOCRITE!!

GoChiefs

skank;999063 wrote:Ah, here's the A #1 hypocrite on this site, always playing the, "you have to beat the best to be the best" card, yet earlier on thyis site made the comment that, "luckily, we were able to drop to DII in 2007". Luckily? So....do you want to play the best or not?

What the hell does what division my school is in have to do with who we play? You're reaching skanky. Desperation? Is there a rule that states you only have to play teams within your division or something that I'm unaware of???

sherm03

Marion Local needs moved out of D6!

61-21?! In a State Final game?!?!

It's just not fair. These MAC teams need moved up...or their own playoffs!

Can you imagine how much shit the two idiots would be posting on here if Delphos St. John beat Buckeye Central in the State Final by that same score?

skank

Division I Public/Parochial by the numbers. (Fun Facts)

The last four years, the only schools that have remained in DI and their record vs Ohio public schools in regular season matchups.

St. Xavier
2008 0-1
2009 1-0
2010 0-0
2011 3-0
4 yrs 4-1

Moeller
2008 3-1
2009 5-0
2010 4-0
2011 3-0
4 yrs 15-1

LaSalle
2008 2-1
2009 3-0
2010 3-0
2011 2-0
4 yrs 10-1

Elder
2008 3-0
2009 2-0
2010 1-1
2011 2-0
4 yrs 8-1

Tol. St. John
2008 6-1
2009 6-1
2010 5-1
2011 4-2
4 yrs 21-5

St. Ignatius
2008 4-1
2009 5-0
2010 2-2
2011 4-1
4 yrs 15-4

St. Edward
2008 3-0
2009 1-1
2010 1-0
2011 1-0
4 yrs 6-1

For a grand total of 79-14 and a winning pct. of .849

Or how about this one?

Since the playoffs started, (1972) Publics and Parochials have gotten together to play for the championship 22 times with the Parochials going 17-5 for a winning pct. of .772. With Canton McKinley winning 3 of the 5.

Despite representing a VERY small pct of schools in DI....Over this span of 22 Public/Parochial head to head matchups 7 parochial schools have been represented, Mooney, Moeller, Tol. St. Francis, St. Edward, St. Ignatius, St. Xavier & Elder, all have at least 1 win, on the other hand, 15 public schools have been represented, WWR, Gahanna Lincoln, Canton McKinley, Massillon, Hoover, Fairfield, Princeton, Centerville, Westerville South, Brunswick, Lima Sr., Huber Heights Wayne, Warren G. Harding, Mentor & Pickerington Central. Only 3 schools have a win. Fairfield, Lima Sr. & Canton Mckinley 3x. So, that's 100% of the parochial schools that have participated winning at least 1, compared to 20% of publics participating winning at least 1.

Now, let's look at DI playoffs ALL TIME....ALL GAMES.

Publics have met parochials 251 times total in the playoffs going 167-84 for a winning pct. of .665

Let's break it down by decade.

1970s Parochials lead 7-3 70%
1980s Parochials lead 30-18 62.5%
1990s Parochials lead 50-24 67.5%
2000s Parochials lead 63-35 64%
2010s Parochials lead 17-4 80% (Parochials went 9-1 this year)

So let's recap shall we?

Over the last 4 years, the constant parochials have a 79-14 .849%
100% of the parochial schools that have played a public for a title have won at least 1
compared to 20% of publics.
Parochials have gone 17-5 in head to head matchups with publics .772%
Parochials have an all time record in all playoff games played of 167-84 .665

Now, I know I'm whining here, crying, pissing, moaning, whatever you want to call it, but I personally think these numbers speak pretty loud.

skank

Sorry, I guess I just wasted my time making that last post, I forgot those numbers simply reflect the fact that parochial school kids work harder and want it more.

Darkon

skank;1000234 wrote:Division I Public/Parochial by the numbers. (Fun Facts)

The last four years, the only schools that have remained in DI and their record vs Ohio public schools

St. Xavier
2008 0-1
2009 1-0
2010 0-0
2011 3-0
4 yrs 4-1

Moeller
2008 3-1
2009 5-0
2010 4-0
2011 3-0
4 yrs 15-1

LaSalle
2008 2-1
2009 3-0
2010 3-0
2011 2-0
4 yrs 10-1

Elder
2008 3-0
2009 2-0
2010 1-1
2011 2-0
4 yrs 8-1

Tol. St. John
2008 6-1
2009 6-1
2010 5-1
2011 4-2
4 yrs 21-5

St. Ignatius
2008 4-1
2009 5-0
2010 2-2
2011 4-1
4 yrs 15-4

St. Edward
2008 3-0
2009 1-1
2010 1-0
2011 1-0
4 yrs 6-1

For a grand total of 79-14 and a winning pct. of .849

Or how about this one?

Since the playoffs started, (1972) Publics and Parochials have gotten together to play for the championship 22 times with the Parochials going 17-5 for a winning pct. of .772. With Canton McKinley winning 3 of the 5.

Despite representing a VERY small pct of schools in DI....Over this span of 22 Public/Parochial head to head matchups 7 parochial schools have been represented, Mooney, Moeller, Tol. St. Francis, St. Edward, St. Ignatius, St. Xavier & Elder, all have at least 1 win, on the other hand, 15 public schools have been represented, WWR, Gahanna Lincoln, Canton McKinley, Massillon, Hoover, Fairfield, Princeton, Centerville, Westerville South, Brunswick, Lima Sr., Huber Heights Wayne, Warren G. Harding, Mentor & Pickerington Central. Only 3 schools have a win. Fairfield, Lima Sr. & Canton Mckinley 3x. So, that's 100% of the parochial schools that have participated winning at least 1, compared to 20% of publics participating winning at least 1.

Now, let's look at DI playoffs ALL TIME....ALL GAMES.

Publics have met parochials 251 times total in the playoffs going 167-84 for a winning pct. of .665

Let's break it down by decade.

1970s Parochials lead 7-3 70%
1980s Parochials lead 30-18 62.5%
1990s Parochials lead 50-24 67.5%
2000s Parochials lead 63-35 64%
2010s Parochials lead 17-4 80% (Parochials went 9-1 this year)

So let's recap shall we?

Over the last 4 years, the constant parochials have a 79-14 .849%
100% of the parochial schools that have played a public for a title have won at least 1
compared to 20% of publics.
Parochials have gone 17-5 in head to head matchups with publics .772%
Parochials have an all time record in all playoff games played of 167-84 .665

Now, I know I'm whining here, crying, pissing, moaning, whatever you want to call it, but I personally think these numbers speak pretty loud.

Your best post this entire thread.
I'm a public guy, but I have a problem with seperation while public schools hide behind "Open Enrollment". I understand that publics have to take all students in their district, but I have yet to read a reasonable solution/rule change.

skank

Darkon;1000251 wrote:Your best post this entire thread.
I'm a public guy, but I have a problem with seperation while public schools hide behind "Open Enrollment". I understand that publics have to take all students in their district, but I have yet to read a reasonable solution/rule change.

Truthfully, when this thread originated, believe it or not, I voted to keep things the way they are....And I meant it. But digging up stats and reading others stats, especially tsst's, it didn't take me long to change my mind. Sure, some will say I just want a trophy handed to me, I'm a juice boxer, whatever, I could care less, all I want is fairness.

GoChiefs

Publics -5
Privates -1

Con_Alma

skank;1000253 wrote:... all I want is fairness.

Then you will never be truly satisfied. Competitive athletics are not fair. They never will be. The human element alone keeps perfection out of the game. Rules based on history don't directly correlate the present style and game. That's just one example.

Competitive athletics are not fair and yet they are still a wonderful teaching tool for student athletes.

Rocket08

Dean Wormer;998871 wrote:Hey Skank, The only taint you are familiar with is that little spot between thicky's balls and a-hole.

The taint jokes never get old, do they?

Rocket08

Con_Alma;1000319 wrote:Then you will never be truly satisfied. Competitive athletics are not fair. They never will be. The human element alone keeps perfection out of the game.

Competitive athletics are not fair and yet they are still a wonderful teaching tool for student athletes.

Excellent post

You're wasting your time here :thumbup:

skank

GoChiefs;1000277 wrote:Publics -5
Privates -1

Ok then, which one went public since last year, Ignatius or Mooney? Remember also, the only two parochials that COULD win a title did.

Con_Alma

skank;1000407 wrote:... Remember also, the only two parochials that COULD win a title did.

????

Huh? Every parochial COULD have won a title this year but very few even made it to the playoffs.

skank

Con_Alma;1000319 wrote:Then you will never be truly satisfied. Competitive athletics are not fair. They never will be. The human element alone keeps perfection out of the game. Rules based on history don't directly correlate the present style and game. That's just one example.

Competitive athletics are not fair and yet they are still a wonderful teaching tool for student athletes.

Who wants perfection? I personally never asked for it. "Rules based on history" you say, look at the numbers again, 5 different decades, and not only did publics never win a "series" against the parochials, the parochials basically dominated EVERY decade. "Rules based on history don't directly correlate the present style and game." Sure looks to me like they do. Especially when you look at the fact that parochials have a 17-5 advantage in head to head matchups in state title games, .772, (there's your "history"), compared to the current 4 year stretch we're in now with parochials holding a commanding 79-14, .849 advantage. Hmm....Looks like they're getting worse.

Archive

Is it time for private schools to have theyre own playoffs in football