Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault...AGAIN

• killer_ewok

  

  Al Capone wrote:

  killer_ewok wrote:

  Writerbuckeye wrote: Oh so one or two times isn't the limit for Ben...but THREE is?
  
  Got it.

  Three strikes you're out........

  Where's the first strike?

  Being a moron and fucking some nut job broad. Put himself in a bad position.
  
  Okay....so maybe it was a "foul tip." It still counts as a strike.
• Automatik

  

  lol roasted? OH NO...fat jokes. Sorry, but I'm a little above that type of pointless banter.
• Heretic

  

  killer_ewok wrote:

  september63 wrote: Big Ben fans you better head to the serious business forum. Ben is now being roasted over there.

  Like I give a shit if people say that he has gained weight and he is fat. It's true. LOL

  Very true. And, hell, fab4 had a reasonably witty one-liner tossed in! After reading what apparently is supposed to pass for insults, wit and snappy commentary here, the fact something made me feel something other than contempt AMAZED me!
• vball10set

  he was an asshole while at Findlay HS,he was an asshole while at Miami University,and he's an asshole now...this leopard WILL NOT change his spots---he's a helluva QB,but he's a dick---period.
• gut

  queencitybuckeye wrote:

  gut wrote: Being accused IN CIVIL COURT of rape, which any nutcase could go after anyone. A case which appears completely bogus from the start.

  I'll bet you $100 that he writes that woman a check. Does that mean he was guilty of rape? No. Does that mean that he behaved in a manner not 100% innocent? Absolutely yes.

  I think if Roethlisberger had any intention of settling he would have already done so. In fact, she already offered to settle for just a public apology and small donation to a battered woman's fund, likely to save face. Many have speculated that Harrah's is the real target (which an admission on Ben's part would serve nicely to further that cause), so your contention that he could be less than 100% innocent is nothing more than baseless speculation. She wouldn't be the first women to go for a money grab.
  
  Civil suits don't prove wrong doing of any sort. Frivolous suits get filed - and settled - all the time. Now, if a jury gives an award in a civil suit, you have a point. But anyone can file a suit and financial decisions are sometimes made regardless of the merits of the case.
• queencitybuckeye

  Yeah, he's a swell guy who is the innocent victim of money-grubbing females taking advantage of his room-temperature IQ.
  
  Over and over and over.
• Gblock

  request for ben's dna has been withdrawn
• Nate

  Automatik wrote: Seriously do I have to say it AGAIN. You can't judge an ENTIRE fanbase by the statements of one or several fans.
  Holy shit how stupid can you be?!
  Who is looking the other way? As a Steeler fan I'm pretty pissed at the situation and I know A LOT that feel the same way.

  And Steelers fans don't do the same thing in thinking that all Browns fans are the same? GTFO already.
• killer_ewok

  

  Keebler wrote:

  Automatik wrote: Seriously do I have to say it AGAIN. You can't judge an ENTIRE fanbase by the statements of one or several fans.
  Holy shit how stupid can you be?!
  Who is looking the other way? As a Steeler fan I'm pretty pissed at the situation and I know A LOT that feel the same way.

  And Steelers fans don't do the same thing in thinking that all Browns fans are the same? GTFO already.

  Nope. Some are that way but I know some quality Cleveland fans such as BR1986FB and I don't have any problem saying so.
• GoChiefs

  

  killer_ewok wrote: Nope. Some are that way but I know some quality Cleveland fans such as BR1986FB and I don't have any problem saying so.

  WTF did I ever do to you? Just messin'.
• gut

  queencitybuckeye wrote: Yeah, he's a swell guy who is the innocent victim of money-grubbing females taking advantage of his room-temperature IQ.
  
  Over and over and over.

  The first one he is counter-suing for damages.
  
  The second we don't even know if a crime was committed. Certainly, the first one does make him an easier target. I'm not saying both are after money, but the first has all kinds of issues and the second had a lawyer before Big Ben did.
  
  Who knows what happened in the second incident? But you're using cirular logic to use both cases to give the other more credibility when the first pretty obviously appears to be fraudulent. That leaves you with one case of he said/she said where it appears no criminal charges will even be filed (eventhough DA's do sometimes chase these cases with very weak evidence).
• queencitybuckeye

  gut wrote:
  The first one he is counter-suing for damages.

  The party with the deep pockets trying to make the other party give up. Pretty obvious tactic.
  

  The second we don't even know if a crime was committed.

  We don't, but to try to pretend that the first incident doesn't make it more likely that this particular smoke is indeed fire is just laughable.
  

  Certainly, the first one does make him an easier target.

  As likely as not, legitimately so.
  

  I'm not saying both are after money, but the first has all kinds of issues

  
  Like possibly being sexually assaulted by an NFL quarterback.
  

  and the second had a lawyer before Big Ben did.

  I would hope that you would stipulate that your client is a particularly stupid man, counsellor. Great athlete, but dumber than a plow handle.
  

  Who knows what happened in the second incident?

  A small number for sure.
  

  But you're using cirular logic to use both cases to give the other more credibility when the first pretty obviously appears to be fraudulent.

  Saying the same thing over and over doesn't make it true. When a settlement is announced, will you be up front enough to admit that it means more than someone just wants it behind them? Because it does. It absolutely does and will.
• rock_knutne

  ^^^^^Your post is nothing but pure speculation while gut gave some clear cut facts and points. Give it up hater!
• queencitybuckeye

  rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^Your post is nothing but pure speculation while gut gave some clear cut facts and points. Give it up hater!

  My offer of a bet is open to you as well, sir. Care to back up your alligator mouth? BTW, the fanboi stuff at your age is pretty pathetic.
• Al Capone

  The latest out of Georgia is that Ben's accuser AND her friends are refusing to cooperate with authorities. HMMMMM.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Al Capone wrote: The latest out of Georgia is that Ben's accuser AND her friends are refusing to cooperate with authorities. HMMMMM.

  sooooo, what you are saying is he...raped her?
• queencitybuckeye

  Al Capone wrote: The latest out of Georgia is that Ben's accuser AND her friends are refusing to cooperate with authorities. HMMMMM.

  Link?
• Automatik

  

  I'm guessing they are starting to realize the case is bogus.
• Al Capone

  Automatik wrote: I'm guessing they are starting to realize the case is bogus.

  +1
• rock_knutne

  queencitybuckeye wrote:

  rock_knutne wrote: ^^^^^Your post is nothing but pure speculation while gut gave some clear cut facts and points. Give it up hater!

  My offer of a bet is open to you as well, sir. Care to back up your alligator mouth? BTW, the fanboi stuff at your age is pretty pathetic.

  Want to make it $500 loud mouth?
  
  BTW, your blind hatred is pathetic queeny, you are so obsessed with any negative press about Pittsburgh that it's like a kid waking up on Christmas day getting their dream present. I swear, most of you act like freaking communists!
• Al Capone

  What is queeny betting on? I may take some action.
• Al Capone

  DeyDurkie5 wrote:

  Al Capone wrote: The latest out of Georgia is that Ben's accuser AND her friends are refusing to cooperate with authorities. HMMMMM.

  sooooo, what you are saying is he...raped her?

  I haven't forgot about our bet durkie boy.
• rock_knutne

  Al Capone wrote: What is queeny betting on? I may take some action.

  This:

  queencitybuckeye wrote:

  gut wrote: Being accused IN CIVIL COURT of rape, which any nutcase could go after anyone. A case which appears completely bogus from the start.

  I'll bet you $100 that he writes that woman a check. Does that mean he was guilty of rape? No. Does that mean that he behaved in a manner not 100% innocent? Absolutely yes.

  Yeah, Ben is going to write a check to a lady he lodged a counter suit against.:rolleyes:
• LJ

  

  Al Capone wrote: ...

  Hey Capone, why don't you tell me where you heard that Tress only wanted to recruit Roethlishberger to OSU as a TE?
• Gblock

  look what happened in the warren sapp case.....security cams blew up her story she told police......