Archive

2016 NFL Offseason Thread

  • Ironman92
    I'll be ok with Bell
  • friendfromlowry
    Bengals could indirectly come out as first round losers because all their WR choices went off the board before their pick, including in picks 21, 22, and 23.
  • Ironman92
    Ok, wanted Jack but about the 3rd guy I wanted with who is left.
  • superman
    Ironman92;1793981 wrote:Ok, wanted Jack but about the 3rd guy I wanted with who is left.
    Jack's knee must be really bad.
  • Terry_Tate
    Really like the William Jackson III pick. Still a lot of WR talent left so they can either trade up to get a guy or wait for someone to fall to them.
  • Ironman92
    superman;1793977 wrote:Who?
    Was wanting Jack
  • Ironman92
    superman;1793983 wrote:Jack's knee must be really bad.
    I feel bad for him sitting there by himself

    Must be messed up
  • Azubuike24
    Didn't like how the WR's went, but the Bengals had to have partly taken Jackson because he was the Steelers guy. The Steelers reached the most of anyone in the round thus far.
  • Iliketurtles
    Azubuike24;1793992 wrote:Didn't like how the WR's went, but the Bengals had to have partly taken Jackson because he was the Steelers guy. The Steelers reached the most of anyone in the round thus far.
    Why do you say that? They needed a CB and the best one left after Jackson was Burns.

    Also with all the DT/DE's falling I'm even more ok with the Cowboys taking Elliott at 4. Hopefully they can get one of them in the 2nd round.
  • Iliketurtles
    Kenny Clark... was not expecting that. Would have expected Reed, Robinson, Jones all to go before him.
  • Azubuike24
    Well I'm not saying they didn't need CB, I'm saying the Bengals just picked the BPA and it happened to be who Pittsburgh was taking...
  • Iliketurtles
    Azubuike24;1793998 wrote:Well I'm not saying they didn't need CB, I'm saying the Bengals just picked the BPA and it happened to be who Pittsburgh was taking...
    You said the Steelers reached the most so far in the first round. Just didn't understand that comment at all. Burns, if the Steelers didn't take him probably goes to KC or Arizona.

    I'm going to say the 49ers trading up for Garnett is the biggest reach. I would have said the biggest reach before this was the Raiders taking Joseph at 14.
  • Iliketurtles
    Ragland, Jack, Reed, Robinson, Dodd, Spence. I'd be happy if the Cowboys got any of these guys with their 2nd round pick. Also makes me a lot happier with them taking Elliott at 4.
  • SportsAndLady
    Pissed Carolina didn't take Vonn Bell to help replace Norman. Wanted OSU to tie miamis first round record.
  • SportsAndLady
    God, roger goodell is such a dick.
  • Ironman92
    SportsAndLady;1794037 wrote:God, roger goodell is such a dick.
    Heard he was going to be on Mike and Mike....what did he say?
  • Iliketurtles
    SportsAndLady;1794037 wrote:God, roger goodell is such a dick.
    Ironman92;1794040 wrote:Heard he was going to be on Mike and Mike....what did he say?
    Yeah I just saw he was on Mike and Mike as well. I want to know what he said too haha.
  • SportsAndLady
    He's just a dick. He refuses to acknowledge that he acts more as a dictator than a commissioner. When asked about giving up some of his penalty powers, he said he never will. That's a power the commissioner has always had. Said that he gets a lot of shit for handing out penalties but he's just doing it for the integrity of the game and he doesn't plan on changing. You know, to protect the integrity of the game.
  • Azubuike24
    Was anyone really impressed with Robert Nkemdiche's post-pick interview?
  • thavoice
    Azubuike24;1793998 wrote:Well I'm not saying they didn't need CB, I'm saying the Bengals just picked the BPA and it happened to be who Pittsburgh was taking...
    Still early on of course, and I don't know who still is out there as I am not a draft guru, but they still do need WR help. Getting the bpa is great and all but I think they have a glaring need. The window in the NFL is so short and I believe they needed more immediate help at WR than CB. If they address the WR position with adequate guys going forward then this argument is moot. As a steelers fan it stunk they took the guy they were likely going to take, but also good happy they bypassed on a WR.
  • Heretic
    Iliketurtles;1794001 wrote:You said the Steelers reached the most so far in the first round. Just didn't understand that comment at all. Burns, if the Steelers didn't take him probably goes to KC or Arizona.

    I'm going to say the 49ers trading up for Garnett is the biggest reach. I would have said the biggest reach before this was the Raiders taking Joseph at 14.
    Well, Yahoo gave them a D+ and said there were a lot better players than who they picked and that he wasn't really a first-round talent. If Azu's right and Cincy did take the guy they wanted, then congrats to them. Cincy needs to occasionally get a meaningful win if they want to have a rivalry!
  • Ironman92
    Azubuike24;1794086 wrote:Was anyone really impressed with Robert Nkemdiche's post-pick interview?
    Very much so.
  • Azubuike24
    Huge fan of Sterling Shepard, I would like to see Cincy make him a RD2 priority, even if they have to trade up.
  • wildcats20
    https://twitter.com/christies_nbc/status/725875177007935491

    Goff's Cal teammates celebrate him going 1st overall.
  • Midstate01
    Did anyone else notice anything odd about when the cameras were on Paxton Lynch?

    Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk