Ohio Chatter DEV

Commander of Awesome

lol at sleeper going full on BR.

https://medium.com/views-from-the-terminal/moneyball-analytics-and-the-laziest-way-possible-to-write-about-the-cleveland-browns-6ce52060e2e9#.ljfsg57me

Great article pwning the media on lazy reporting. Wish more articles were like this.

like_that

sleeper;1792011 wrote:I'm not going to do the search now. I do remember being the only one on here against Manziel from Day 1, even before the Browns drafted him.

I am just going to quote this post just in case you decide to delete this. Even you know this isn't your best effort at bullshitting.

sleeper

like_that;1792014 wrote:I am just going to quote this post just in case you decide to delete this. Even you know this isn't your best effort at bullshitting.

???

Feel free to dig through my posts and find a single one that doesn't call Manziel a piece of trash worthy of a spot in the NFL.

Automatik

You've been the extreme opposite of FW regarding Manziel this entire time. I remember you blasting Cleveland for the pick.

like_that

sleeper;1792021 wrote:???

Feel free to dig through my posts and find a single one that doesn't call Manziel a piece of trash worthy of a spot in the NFL.

I am not disputing that. You claimed you were laughed at. This is 100% bullshit. Outside of footwedge and Iqqy nobody was bullish on Jff.

sleeper

Automatik;1792025 wrote:You've been the extreme opposite of FW regarding Manziel this entire time. I remember you blasting Cleveland for the pick.

Correct.

like_that;1792026 wrote:I am not disputing that. You claimed you were laughed at. This is 100% bullshit. Outside of footwedge and Iqqy nobody was bullish on Jff.

If I get some time this afternoon, I'll go through and re-post as needed. You are mis-remembering.

sleeper

http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?44451-Random-Draft-Talk/page4&highlight=Browns

There's a lot of good shit in this thread.

You can summarize this entire thread with the phrase "sleeper is always right".

Edit: Maybe people weren't directly saying Manziel was going to win Super Bowls, but a lot of people were hedging their bets by not taking a position. Only dlazz and I really went hard after Manziel as being straight garbage. That takes balls.

vball10set

like_that;1792006 wrote:Link to you being laughed at?

don't hold your breath...total bs

sleeper

Pretty incredible that two of the posters calling me out are the same ones who hedged their bets on JFF. Going through and reading some of the historical threads you can see the trend quite clearly:

Sleeper = "Manziel sucks, will never win anything, is garbage, trash, terrible"
Everyone else "Manziel could be really good!"

LOL

like_that

sleeper;1792031 wrote:http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?44451-Random-Draft-Talk/page4&highlight=Browns

There's a lot of good shit in this thread.

You can summarize this entire thread with the phrase "sleeper is always right".

Edit: Maybe people weren't directly saying Manziel was going to win Super Bowls, but a lot of people were hedging their bets by not taking a position. Only dlazz and I really went hard after Manziel as being straight garbage. That takes balls.

I see nobody laughing at you. I see most people being cautious with Jff at the worst.

Congrats on predicting a QB that just got drafted will suck though. Went out in a limb there! That's like me bragging about saying Weeden would be trash. Nothing to really to boast about.

like_that

sleeper;1792037 wrote:Pretty incredible that two of the posters calling me out are the same ones who hedged their bets on JFF. Going through and reading some of the historical threads you can see the trend quite clearly:

Sleeper = "Manziel sucks, will never win anything, is garbage, trash, terrible"
Everyone else "Manziel could be really good!"

LOL

Now you're changing your tune. First everyone laughed at you and now everyone was hedging their bets.

The irony here is you are currently hedging your argument LOL.

Thanks for proving my point.

sleeper

like_that;1792042 wrote:Now you're changing your tune. First everyone laughed at you and now everyone was hedging their bets.

The irony here is you are currently hedging your argument LOL.

Thanks for proving my point.

Sorry for not sifting through 1000's of pages of internet threads to find more evidence.

The reality is, I have been 100% correct on every Cleveland QB ever drafted with no hedging of my bets. I am the only poster who consistently makes predictions that end up being correct more often than not. Let me know when you grow some balls and start giving an actual opinion instead of just flailing around like a fish out of water.

like_that

sleeper;1792044 wrote:Sorry for not sifting through 1000's of pages of internet threads to find more evidence.

The reality is, I have been 100% correct on every Cleveland QB ever drafted with no hedging of my bets. I am the only poster who consistently makes predictions that end up being correct more often than not. Let me know when you grow some balls and start giving an actual opinion instead of just flailing around like a fish out of water.

I am not disputing you were correct. I even congratulated you. I am just looking for everyone laughing at you.

sleeper

like_that;1792048 wrote:I am not disputing you were correct. I even congratulated you. I am just looking for everyone laughing at you.

Tone is often difficult to come across on the internet.

Commander of Awesome

sleeper;1792044 wrote:Sorry for not sifting through 1000's of pages of internet threads to find more evidence.

The reality is, I have been 100% correct on every Cleveland QB ever drafted with no hedging of my bets. I am the only poster who consistently makes predictions that end up being correct more often than not. Let me know when you grow some balls and start giving an actual opinion instead of just flailing around like a fish out of water.

Outside of BR and weeden, and JFF nuthuggers I can't think of anyone who thought any of the QBs the browns drafted would be good. Really went on a limb there lil guy. I could thump my chest just as much as you did. lolfail

friendfromlowry

Automatik;1791994 wrote:Something new? Or are you referring to the Rosenhaus statement?

Heretic;1791997 wrote:News story today about how he rented an expensive house in LA (over last weekend, I think, but can't remember the timeline) and he and his friends wrecked the place. Owner came back at 2 p.m. (they were supposed to have left the premises by noon, as per the agreement) and Manziel was passed out on a couch, there was evidence of cocaine all over the place, a bag of shrooms and, as said, the house was wrecked.

Another day in the life, in other words.

What Heretic said, and also:
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25553661/los-angeles-police-johnny-manziel-was-a-passenger-in-a-hit-and-run

Commander of Awesome

LOL, I was waiting for this: "OLB Paul Kruger said Barkevious Mingo has put on muscle, excited for him, yet to be tapped into as far as how versatile he can be"

SportsAndLady

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/15270927/cleveland-browns-trade-talks-involving-no-2-overall-pick-nfl-draft-uncertain-whether-make-trade

A) I don't even know why this article was written. There's literally no substance in there.

B) yay. Can't wait to trade the pick for an extra late round first and a couple 2nd and 3rd round picks. #Superbowl

sleeper

SportsAndLady;1792317 wrote:http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/15270927/cleveland-browns-trade-talks-involving-no-2-overall-pick-nfl-draft-uncertain-whether-make-trade

A) I don't even know why this article was written. There's literally no substance in there.

B) yay. Can't wait to trade the pick for an extra late round first and a couple 2nd and 3rd round picks. #Superbowl

I think its telling you the QB the Rams want is also the one the Browns want. I'm okay with dropping back here provided we get a strong cache of picks similar to what the Titans got. I really don't think, outside of QB, there's a position the Browns need to draft at #2 that would make this team competitive over night. Maybe an OL to replace Thomas but if that's the case, Thomas needs to be moved.

Crimson streak

sleeper;1792322 wrote:I think its telling you the QB the Rams want is also the one the Browns want. I'm okay with dropping back here provided we get a strong cache of picks similar to what the Titans got. I really don't think, outside of QB, there's a position the Browns need to draft at #2 that would make this team competitive over night. Maybe an OL to replace Thomas but if that's the case, Thomas needs to be moved.

That's what I'm thinking as well. I really think the Browns want goff but the Rams kinda fucked them by moving to 1. If hue isn't sold on wentz then absolutely trade back and get a shit load of picks to help the rebuild. Hell if they can slide back enough get a shit ton of picks take either tunsil or Stanley where they trade back to and trade Thomas for either a first or 2nd I would be more than ok with that

Benny The Jet

Just got an notification on phone that Browns "better than 50% chance to trade #2 pick. Eagles want deal done today". Think it was bleacher report. Rumor is its 1st and 3rd this and next year

Sonofanump

Benny The Jet;1792372 wrote:Just got an notification on phone that Browns "better than 50% chance to trade #2 pick. Eagles want deal done today". Think it was bleacher report. Rumor is its 1st and 3rd this and next year

To move back 6 picks? Oh, ok, notify the league its a done deal.

sleeper

Benny The Jet;1792372 wrote:Just got an notification on phone that Browns "better than 50% chance to trade #2 pick. Eagles want deal done today". Think it was bleacher report. Rumor is its 1st and 3rd this and next year

To move back to #8?

I'd be okay with that if its 2 1sts and 2 3rds but the greedy fan in me thinks we should get one of those 3rds moved to a 2nd.

like_that

I hope the niners come back with the same or better offer.

SportsAndLady

Two top QB prospects.

Browns have a top 2 pick.

Browns need a QB (desperately).

...only the Browns would trade their pick. SMH.

Archive

2016 Browns Season Thread