2016 Browns Season Thread
-
bases_loaded
How can you say Pac Man got the better of Pryor with RGIII lobbing grenades out there? -
Ironman92
I would do a 4th for risk that Romo would be a good QB for 1 year. Stockpiling picks is great but the fans deserve some hope they are going to have a good QB.Benny The Jet;1828538 wrote:What would it take, a 4th? I know at some point you have to pull the trigger on someone...but an oft injured QB behind our current line....Romo may literally die behind them. -
SportsAndLady
If the Browns could get Romo for a 4th round pick, and they don't do it? Well let's just say id snap -
Azubuike24
The Browns have more picks than they will have roster spots. Why not?
Would you sign Alshon Jeffery over Terrelle Pryor? -
Benny The Jet
That's a good one. If they were to cost the same...give me Jeffery. He's also a year younger.Azubuike24;1828556 wrote:The Browns have more picks than they will have roster spots. Why not?
Would you sign Alshon Jeffery over Terrelle Pryor? -
Sonofanump
Why subject the red coats to such a product?
-
like_that
Mcshay posted his first mock. He has the browns taking Johnathan Allen and Takkarist McKinley.
He has only one QB (the dude from UNC) going in the first round and its the 30th pick. -
Mulva
I would not trade for Romo. That's a waste. -
SportsAndLady
That happened last year, too. First mocks came out and not a QB in sight. Then a few emerged. Should be the same thing this year. I'd bet a million dollars a QB goes in the first 30 picks.like_that;1828638 wrote:Mcshay posted his first mock. He has the browns taking Johnathan Allen and Takkarist McKinley.
He has only one QB (the dude from UNC) going in the first round and its the 30th pick. -
wildcats20
CBS had the Browns taking Trubisky 1 overall just 2 weeks ago. -
SportsAndLady
Yeah def a waste to get a top 10'ish QB. It's not like the browns need a good QB or anything. And besides, gotta salvage those mid round draft picks!!Mulva;1828640 wrote:I would not trade for Romo. That's a waste. -
Benny The Jet
Off the top of my head...these teams all need a QB.
Browns
Jets
49ers
Bears
Bills (maybe)
Cardinals (maybe)
Anyone else? I would find it really hard to believe that Trubisky is the only 1st rounder and he's #30. I'd say someone will end up a top 10 pick. -
like_that
I think a QB of value will fall to the 2nd.
-
iclfan2
That sounds stupid. Garret is by far the best player in the draft. And no way a QB doesn't go until 30. I'll take garret and trubisky all day.like_that;1828638 wrote:Mcshay posted his first mock. He has the browns taking Johnathan Allen and Takkarist McKinley.
He has only one QB (the dude from UNC) going in the first round and its the 30th pick. -
Crimson streak
I think it all depends where the eagles pick falls on what we do at number 1. I'm curious to see what qb comes out as the leader after work outs and such
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Mulva
He'll be 37 this off season. He doesn't fit the Browns timeframe. All it does is postpone making a decision on the future.SportsAndLady;1828644 wrote:Yeah def a waste to get a top 10'ish QB. It's not like the browns need a good QB or anything. And besides, gotta salvage those mid round draft picks!! -
SportsAndLady
Start Romo for a year or two, but still look for your QB of the future. This isn't rocket science. It'll be good to get a few average to above average seasons once in a while to start the future of the franchise. Rather than just completely suck for the next two years until everyone gets some experience.Mulva;1828656 wrote:He'll be 37 this off season. He doesn't fit the Browns timeframe. All it does is postpone making a decision on the future.
It's a win-win for the Browns. -
like_that
He probably is factoring in the stupidity of the Cleveland browns.iclfan2;1828653 wrote:That sounds stupid. Garret is by far the best player in the draft. And no way a QB doesn't go until 30. I'll take garret and trubisky all day. -
Heretic
That's what I hate about this way-too-early mocks. You know that as the combines start, everyone will start jizzing about one quarterback or another and he'll jump up to a top-five slot on everyone's board.iclfan2;1828653 wrote:That sounds stupid. Garret is by far the best player in the draft. And no way a QB doesn't go until 30. I'll take garret and trubisky all day. -
Commander of Awesome
lol S&L going full S&L about reaching for a QB again. Romo wouldn't make it out of preseason here, trading anything for him would be foolish. -
SportsAndLady
Absolutely foolish! We're doing just fine the way we believe will then things around! 4th rounders are way too valuable to give up for a good QB!
-
Automatik
I'm not sure he would last longer than RG3. -
Crimson streak
The only way I'm trading for romo is if we still take a qb either at 1 or the eagles pick. The offensive line can be filled out with our 2nd rounders or fa. Bitonio and Thomas on the left side are one of the best left sides in the game. As long as we fill out the right side and get a god damn capable center the offensive line will be fine. But a first round of Garrett/ trubisky or Kizer would be absolutely amazing
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Commander of Awesome
I'm actually fine with our online. Tell Erving to GFH, slide Greco to center, Cooper at RG, Coleman/Drango/Paztor battle it out for RT. Groom one for LT. That's a great oline.Crimson streak;1828691 wrote:The only way I'm trading for romo is if we still take a qb either at 1 or the eagles pick. The offensive line can be filled out with our 2nd rounders or fa. Bitonio and Thomas on the left side are one of the best left sides in the game. As long as we fill out the right side and get a god damn capable center the offensive line will be fine. But a first round of Garrett/ trubisky or Kizer would be absolutely amazing
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk