Archive

Browns @ Falcons

  • DeyDurkie5
    He's a fucking backup. Who the fuck cares what he does?
  • BR1986FB
    Al Bundy;1677987 wrote:As an adult, he has every right to do what he wants, but it isn't going to help his career. Since the draft, how many cases has he exercised bad judgement? He doesn't learn from his mistakes. He always uses the "I am only 21 excuse", but then he goes out and does something else stupid.
    My issue is that he's out that late during the season. Do I think he's going to start problems? No, not really, but he's a target for idiots to try to start shit with. It's unfortunate but when you're famous, people want to be around you, for good reasons, or bad.
  • like_that
    Mark me down as somebody who doesn't give a fuck how late the backup qb stays out two nights before a game. Especially considering he didn't drink that night.
  • Commander of Awesome
    ^ this

    These guys would be QQing hard at guys like Lawrence Taylor back in the day.
  • Con_Alma
    like_that;1678174 wrote:Mark me down as somebody who doesn't give a fuck how late the backup qb stays out two nights before a game. ...
    You can add me to this list.
  • Con_Alma
    DeyDurkie5;1678063 wrote:He's a fucking backup. Who the fuck cares what he does?
    Agreed.
  • like_that
    Commander of Awesome;1678176 wrote:^ this

    These guys would be QQing hard at guys like Lawrence Taylor back in the day.
    Lol yup. I've read stories where teams would send send women to LT's hotel room the night before a game to keep him up all night. Not only did he let the women in (most likely with drugs), he pwned the next day on the field.
  • Commander of Awesome
    like_that;1678193 wrote:Lol yup. I've read stories where teams would send send women to LT's hotel room the night before a game to keep him up all night. Not only did he let the women in (most likely with drugs), he pwned the next day on the field.
    He's no pace, Ogden or Munoz though.
  • BR1986FB
    Commander of Awesome;1678197 wrote:He's no pace, Ogden or Munoz though.
    Neither is Thomas. He's got a few years to go before he can be in that discussion. Give it a few years and then you can "biased/homer" him all you want as the professed "GOAT." It's not even close right now.
  • Commander of Awesome
    Orlando pace 7 time pro bowler, 5 time all pro. Joes got him beat already lol lol lol
  • Footwedge
    se-alum;1678002 wrote:Manziel had every opportunity to take the starting job from a guy that played in only 2.25 games last year and tore his ACL under a different regime. The coaches and FO owed Hoyer nothing, yet Manziel couldn't beat him out for the starting job. Face it, he's not good enough right now.
    Manziel DID win the starting job. But Kojak handed the ball to the loser. its the way that went down. A lttle more history for you...and the other diphits that don't understand the politics of professional football.

    The Vikings were an expansion team in 1960 along with the Dallas Cowboys. Minnesota management drafted Fran Tarkngton, coached by Norm Van Brockln. Van Brocklin had a crowbar up his ass in wanting a prototypical, drop back passer. Despite Tark's play, Van Brocklin told management after a few years either Fran goes or he goes. Tark was shipped off the Giants and he resurrected a proud, but horrible franchise. Enter Kojak to the Browns. My fear is that his stubbornness in old school thinking will force the hand of management to jettison Manziel. It would be deja vu in trading away a future hall of famer.


    Today on Kyle and Booms the brilliant and eloquent Chuck Booms called the Browns season "rabbits foot football". LOL. Oh how right he is. The AFC North is NOT loaded with great teams, but teams that have had the fortune of playing the dreadful NFC South AND the woeful AFC south. Mr. McGoo playing quarterback for the Browns has driven through construction sites with wrecking balls falling all around him...and he never gets killed. a caller asked Booms what the Browns record would be if Manziel were the qb this season and without hesitation, he said 9-2...and rightfully so...although 10-1 would not be out of the question.

    Only in Cleveland are the fans so blinded by the ineptitude pla of this horrible quarterback. Yessir...OIC.
  • Footwedge
    jmog;1677991 wrote:Did you REALLY complain about someone else's jibberish and then post this garbage?
    Look dude, if you want to concede losing the debate to me then just man up and say so, mmmmmkay?
  • Con_Alma
    Footwedge;1678255 wrote:Manziel DID win the starting job. ....
    Based on whose criteria and whose evaluation?
  • Footwedge
    I seldom watch prime time since TJ and Berman don't do the show. Ron Jaworski popped a load in his pants in detailing the ingenious play schemes in getting receivers wide open for Mr. McGoo and his final drive to the game winning FG. Jaws is dead wrong on Manziel...but is dead nuts on with his assessment of Shanahan.


    My guess is that both Shanahan and Loggains have nightmares reliving in their heads the dirtballs and air balls that McGoo heaves out there each and every Sunday afternoon. After all, their careers, and the money they make are directly related to how well the offense/quarterback performs. In spite of designing plays that have repeatedly allowed wide open receivers to run wild in the respective secondaries, the quarterback has the WORST COMPLETION PERCENTAGE in the entire NFL. But, but, but...10-4...10-4. LMAO.

    OIC...are the fans so fucking stupid that they actually think that Bran Hoyer is the reason why this team is 7-4. All the while...the future hall of fame quarterback who outperformed Hoyer in every preseason game continues to rot away on the bench.
  • BR1986FB
    Con_Alma;1678260 wrote:Based on whose criteria and whose evaluation?
    Why Footwedge's, of course? You know, the same "source" that told us that Shanahan and Loggains (the QB coach) REALLY want Johnny to be the starter but Pettine is in love with Hoyer.
  • jmog
    Footwedge;1678257 wrote:Look dude, if you want to concede losing the debate to me then just man up and say so, mmmmmkay?
    At least you almost got that sentence correct. Compared to the monstrosity I quoted earlier that sentence looks to have been written by Shakespeare in comparison.

    You still have yet to quote where I said that Manziel is a "shitty scrambler" that you accused me of.

    Using Booms as your source, by the way, is hilarious.
  • Footwedge
    Con_Alma;1678260 wrote:Based on whose criteria and whose evaluation?
    Based on raw numbers...quarterback ratings, first downs, touchdowns scored, yards gained rushing, etc. Do you know how to read box scores? You can debate me all you want on opinions...but you can't debate things that are based on facts.
  • BR1986FB
    jmog;1678269 wrote: Using Booms as your source, by the way, is hilarious.
    Yeah, Booms' partner, Kiley, was trying to point out that it wasn't a "good idea" for Manziel to be out at 2:30am in the morning ("nothing good happens after midnight, etc") and Booms response? Hoyer's completion percentage. Booms is such a worthless turd.
  • BR1986FB
    Exactly how many times did Manziel start in the preseason and how many times did he face a first team defense vs Hoyer?
  • Footwedge
    jmog;1678269 wrote:At least you almost got that sentence correct. Compared to the monstrosity I quoted earlier that sentence looks to have been written by Shakespeare in comparison.

    You still have yet to quote where I said that Manziel is a "shitty scrambler" that you accused me of.

    Using Booms as your source, by the way, is hilarious.
    I don't use Booms as a source...I simply stated what he said on his show. The brilliant and eloquent Chuck Booms had some great points. Regarding your stance on Manziel as a scrambler, why should I respond to your nonsense? You don't even know the definition of a scrambling quarterback. You and Al Turdy somehow think yards gained is what a scrambling quarterback is graded on. Face it dude. You're ignorant.
  • BR1986FB
    "The brilliant and eloquent Chuck Booms had some great points." That statement alone is cause for permaban.
  • Mulva
    Footwedge;1678271 wrote:You can debate me all you want on opinions...but you can't debate things that are based on facts.
    You mean like being 10-4 as a starting QB?
  • Footwedge
    BR1986FB;1678274 wrote:Exactly how many times did Manziel start in the preseason and how many times did he face a first team defense vs Hoyer?
    Yet another brilliant retort by our overeaters anonymous resident. Exactly how many times did Manziel play with the first team offensive line, wide receivers? Weren't you the one Sunday calling for McGoo's head?

    Go back to sucking on Hoyer's nutsack. Rejoin the club of loving the most innacurate quarterback in the NFL.
  • jmog
    Footwedge;1678265 wrote: All the while...the future hall of fame quarterback who outperformed Hoyer in every preseason game continues to rot away on the bench.
    You keep harping on many things, but 2 in particular are rather funny.

    1. Hoyer's completion percentage is the worst in the NFL
    2. Manziel outperformed Hoyer in the preseason in every game.

    Right now Hoyer is at 56% completion, which you are correct, is the worst of all "qualifying" QBs this season.
    Hoyer's preseason completion percentage was 54.5, so he is slightly better right now than preseason, but right at where we thought he was.

    What was Manziel's preseason completion percentage oh Failwedge? 50.8%...that's right, nearly 4 points lower than Hoyer's. So, you are rather incorrect on the "he outplayed Hoyer in all 4 games" especially since you like to pile on the completion percentage stats.

    Keep showing how much of a moron you are and keep touting college stats. If you want to tout college stats I would bet that Tebow and Troy Smith were just as good or better college stats than Manziel, and how did they pan out in the NFL? College stats mean nearly zero in the NFL, especially at QB.

    Do I think Manziel will be terrible? Absolutely not, he needs time to learn the system and how to play QB effectively in the NFL.

    Anyone who understands how the NFL works, especially at the QB position, knows we'd be lucky to be .500 with Manziel, but would probably be worse.
  • jmog
    Footwedge;1678279 wrote:I don't use Booms as a source...I simply stated what he said on his show. The brilliant and eloquent Chuck Booms had some great points. Regarding your stance on Manziel as a scrambler, why should I respond to your nonsense? You don't even know the definition of a scrambling quarterback. You and Al Turdy somehow think yards gained is what a scrambling quarterback is graded on. Face it dude. You're ignorant.
    No, moron, you are the one that in the same post that talked about his scrambling and then stated he would get 75+ yards a game. So, you are the one that connected scrambling with rushing yards.

    Once you realized how stupid you sounded you changed your stance and started talking about Tarkenton.