Archive

2014-2015 Cleveland Cavaliers Season Thread

  • BR1986FB
    Dr. KnOiTaLL;1734851 wrote:Just what we need, another guy to clog the lane. Makes sense.
    I'm sensing sarcasm from Automatik unless you're also agreeing, in a sarcastic way. I don't want Wade's old broke ass unless he's coming off the bench and you know his ego isn't allowing that.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    sleeper;1734852 wrote:Then don't watch. People said the Cavs wouldn't get where they are now and they did. Your analysis is shit. The Cavs can absolutely win this series and they can absolutely win playing 'small ball'. I mean do you even watch basketball? LOL

    you're right!! cavs in 6!!!11!! book it guyz!!!!


    idiot.
  • BR1986FB
    sleeper;1734852 wrote:Then don't watch. People said the Cavs wouldn't get where they are now and they did. Your analysis is shit. The Cavs can absolutely win this series and they can absolutely win playing 'small ball'. I mean do you even watch basketball? LOL
    Unless the Cavs "supporting cast" morph into completely different players, I don't think they can keep up playing small ball.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    BR1986FB;1734857 wrote:Unless the Cavs "supporting cast" morph into completely different players, I don't think they can keep up playing small ball.
    dont question sleeper
    we were already told to book it, so just book it.
  • sleeper
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1734853 wrote:Um, no. Curry had a bad game and still scored 19.. Klay was on fire.

    But nice try.
    And they lost. Nice try!
  • sleeper
    BR1986FB;1734857 wrote:Unless the Cavs "supporting cast" morph into completely different players, I don't think they can keep up playing small ball.
    They played small ball in Games 2 and 3 and they won. Not sure why this concept is hard to grasp.
  • sleeper
    lhslep134;1734849 wrote:This series would be different if GS got called for even a fraction of the moving screens they get away with.
    Or even just call the ones where the GSW grab and lift the legs on the Cavs player. I mean, how do you not call that every time? I've dubbed it "The Kerr Screen" because they do it on almost every one, especially when they swing a player from one side of the court to the other.
  • sleeper
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1734858 wrote:dont question sleeper
    we were already told to book it, so just book it.
    Yeah I suppose we should just be pessimistic and cry. Good plan.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    sleeper;1734859 wrote:And they lost. Nice try!

    It'll take more than just Curry being off. We need their guys to be off and we have to hit ours. They wont let JR have open looks anymore so shump has to step up. Hes shrinking in the spotlight. either that or hes hurt worse than hes letting on.
  • sleeper
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1734865 wrote:It'll take more than just Curry being off. We need their guys to be off and we have to hit ours. They wont let JR have open looks anymore so shump has to step up. Hes shrinking in the spotlight. either that or hes hurt worse than hes letting on.
    Game 2; just curry was off and we won.

    Zwick logic: We will need more than just Curry being off to win.

    Nice!
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    sleeper;1734866 wrote:Game 2; just curry was off and we won.

    Zwick logic: We will need more than just Curry being off to win.

    Nice!

    All games played are the same!!!!111!!!

    sleeper logic.
  • BR1986FB
    sleeper;1734861 wrote:They played small ball in Games 2 and 3 and they won. Not sure why this concept is hard to grasp.
    Bogut played significantly more in 2 & 3 than 4 & 5. GS figured out he's their weak link.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    Cavs were out rebounding GS by a nice margin when they won before they went small.. the last 2 games cavs were +5 and -6

    but no, sleeper, nothing has changed.
  • sleeper
    BR1986FB;1734868 wrote:Bogut played significantly more in 2 & 3 than 4 & 5. GS figured out he's their weak link.
    It's a game of adjustments. I think Mozgov needs more minutes because he can put points on the board and give you plenty of rebounds. On the pick and roll, you don't switch and you hedge out Curry and have Lebron/TT cover the backdoor cut while Movgoz recovers on his man.
  • sleeper
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1734869 wrote:Cavs were out rebounding GS by a nice margin before they went small.. they last 2 games cavs were +5 and -6

    but no, sleeper, nothing has changed.
    Cavs in 7.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    sleeper;1734871 wrote:Cavs in 7.

    I'd love it if you were right.

    I don't see it though
  • BR1986FB
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1734869 wrote:Cavs were out rebounding GS by a nice margin when they won before they went small.. the last 2 games cavs were +5 and -6

    but no, sleeper, nothing has changed.
    What killed them last night was the second chances GS were getting with the offensive rebounds.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    BR1986FB;1734876 wrote:What killed them last night was the second chances GS were getting with the offensive rebounds.
    thats kinda what happens though when they force your only big man to the wing to cover their pg.
  • Mulva
    Anything worth reading on the past 5 pages of this thread?
  • BR1986FB
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1734877 wrote:thats kinda what happens though when they force your only big man to the wing to cover their pg.
    Yeah, I know. Right now, the Cavs, to me, are like a mouse that the Warriors (the cat) are just playing/toying with. They know they've got them right where they want them and there's not much they (Cavs) can do about it. They've figured out the formula in how to beat them and the Cavs don't have much of an answer, personnel wise. Still hoping for a stunner.
  • sleeper
    BR1986FB;1734881 wrote:Yeah, I know. Right now, the Cavs, to me, are like a mouse that the Warriors (the cat) are just playing/toying with. They know they've got them right where they want them and there's not much they (Cavs) can do about it. They've figured out the formula in how to beat them and the Cavs don't have much of an answer, personnel wise. Still hoping for a stunner.
    Cavs should just start Perkins and have him set continuously moving hard screens until he is ejected.
  • BR1986FB
    sleeper;1734882 wrote:Cavs should just start Perkins and have him set continuously moving hard screens until he is ejected.
    I'm surprised he hasn't seen some time. I know he's garbage but he might be able to "deter" some Warrior traffic in the lane.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    sleeper;1734882 wrote:Cavs should just start Perkins and have him set continuously moving hard screens until he is ejected.
    at least bring Perk up top to switch on Curry then land on him when he tries to block his shot.
  • robj55
    Zwick says that the Cavs are exposed when it was a 1 point game with 4 minutes left in the game, makes sense.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    robj55;1734885 wrote:Zwick says that the Cavs are exposed when it was a 1 point game with 4 minutes left in the game, makes sense.

    no way!! did you know it was tied at zero to start?
    They even won 2 that way!