Archive

2012 NFL Random Chatter

  • j_crazy
    lhslep134;1107384 wrote:And the first chip has fallen! This is very exciting. If/when Washington throws a bunch of money at Peyton that leaves Us/Miami for Flynn, and if Flynn goes to Miami, then the bargaining power shifts significantly in our favor in the RGIII lottery.

    I think none of this happens.
  • SportsAndLady
    j_crazy;1107411 wrote:I think none of this happens.
    Peyton to the Brownies?!
  • IggyPride00
    I am wondering if Miami goes full guns blazing after Peyton right now.

    They have an owner looking to make a splash, and have a franchise left tackle as well as All-Pro receiver for him to throw to.

    I think Peyton is going to be very choosey about where he goes, as I think winning quickly is going to be a bigger concern than money given his age. He doesn't have time really for a 2-3 year rebuild, so I see him looking to find a team that has the pieces in place other than a QB if possible.

    People keep saying Washington, but I just don't see him going there. It has been the land of disfunction, and that team is not really close at all. Not to mention that the NFC east is a tough division as there are no cupcakes to beat up on.
  • lhslep134
    j_crazy;1107411 wrote:I think none of this happens.

    :( one can always dream
  • THE4RINGZ
    The Colts are cleaning house today.
  • chicago510
    Two Broncos Suspended for "Non-Human" Urine in their drug test.
    DJ Williams and Ryan McBean were each suspended six games.
    Williams and McBean were found to allegedly have "non-human" urine in their system, a source told ESPN senior NFL writer John Clayton.
    These guys are idiots if they just decided to pour some dog piss or something in there and think they would pass. But don't they actually watch these guys pee? Gay yes, but prevents you from using a Whizinator or something.
  • ichsnjb
    chicago510;1110411 wrote:Two Broncos Suspended for "Non-Human" Urine in their drug test.



    These guys are idiots if they just decided to pour some dog piss or something in there and think they would pass. But don't they actually watch these guys pee? Gay yes, but prevents you from using a Whizinator or something.


    http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2F&gl=US#/watch?v=8D_XLCmY0D8

    And You're better than that
    - Grant Hill
  • DeyDurkie5
    http://www.twitlonger.com/show/gbhvr8


    Trade between rams and redskins done?
  • chicago510
    DeyDurkie5;1110756 wrote:http://www.twitlonger.com/show/gbhvr8


    Trade between rams and redskins done?

    Damn if true. Solid ass trade for Rams.
  • DeyDurkie5
    It's blowing up on twitter. Looks like it's a done deal. Crazy.
  • gorocks99
    Wow, three first round picks? Betting the farm on RG3
  • ptown_trojans_1
    Ummm., I know RGIII is good, but three 1st round picks?
    Sounds like another awesome Redskins move........
  • gerb131
    I'd like to see my Bengals take a run at Brandon Jacobs.
  • Mr Miyagi
    They had a helicopter following Pat Bowlen's vehicle from the airport to Denver's facilities last night....Are they crazy? Why would Manning want to sign with the Broncos and back up Tim Tebow for 4 years? LOL!!!
  • like_that
    Mr Miyagi;1111226 wrote:They had a helicopter following Pat Bowlen's vehicle from the airport to Denver's facilities last night....Are they crazy? Why would Manning want to sign with the Broncos and back up Tim Tebow for 4 years? LOL!!!


    /skyhook
    FIFY
  • Mr Miyagi
    ^^^^^LOL!!! Yeah I should've added that
  • Dr. KnOiTaLL
    The trade for the Rams is pretty insane. Word is that the Browns tried to jump back in at the last minute and were willing to match the Redskins offer, but they didn't want to move the #22 pick this year. I'm glad the Browns didn't make the deal, though. 3 firsts and a second rounder is a solid 4 starters. Pretty silly if you ask me unless they think RG3 is Cam Newton and a better passer...
  • BR1986FB
    Dr. KnOiTaLL;1111301 wrote:The trade for the Rams is pretty insane. Word is that the Browns tried to jump back in at the last minute and were willing to match the Redskins offer, but they didn't want to move the #22 pick this year. I'm glad the Browns didn't make the deal, though. 3 firsts and a second rounder is a solid 4 starters. Pretty silly if you ask me unless they think RG3 is Cam Newton and a better passer...
    Browns offered both of their 1st's this year.

    I have no issue with the Skins deal. Their owner dared to be great by going "all in" for a dynamic talent. He wants to win a championship and will be willing to spend in free agency to surround him with talent.

    If you stand in the batter's box with the bat on your shoulder ALL of your life you're never going to hit a home run.

    Could Snyder's trade blow up in his face? Sure, but at least he dared to be great...something the Browns can't say.
  • DeyDurkie5
    BR1986FB;1111479 wrote:Browns offered both of their 1st's this year.

    I have no issue with the Skins deal. Their owner dared to be great by going "all in" for a dynamic talent. He wants to win a championship and will be willing to spend in free agency to surround him with talent.

    If you stand in the batter's box with the bat on your shoulder ALL of your life you're never going to hit a home run.

    Could Snyder's trade blow up in his face? Sure, but at least he dared to be great...something the Browns can't say.
    except you want to trade back and bolster our defense and OL? LOL talk about daring to be great!
  • BR1986FB
    DeyDurkie5;1111480 wrote:except you want to trade back and bolster our defense and OL? LOL talk about daring to be great!
    I do NOW because there's NOTHING worth taking at #4. I was all in for a trade up but with nothing of value there now, trade down.
  • DeyDurkie5
    BR1986FB;1111483 wrote:I do NOW because there's NOTHING worth taking at #4. I was all in for a trade up but with nothing of value there now, trade down.
    a stud RB, a stud CB, a stud WR. There are plenty of playmakers available at 4.
  • BR1986FB
    DeyDurkie5;1111491 wrote:a stud RB, a stud CB, a stud WR. There are plenty of playmakers available at 4.
    Why add the weapons when it's a waste with the current QB? Build up the right side of the O-Line and the front 7.
  • DeyDurkie5
    BR1986FB;1111498 wrote:Why add the weapons when it's a waste with the current QB? Build up the right side of the O-Line and the front 7.
    because unlike you, I think mccoy can manage a game. It's not like he went out there and literally shit down his pants. He's still an NFL starter and given a good line and weapons, he can succeed. Man you are stubborn haha

    also, you seriously don't want to add weapons because you think our qb is bad? give me a break on that one. You are smarter than that BR