Archive

#5 Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4) @ #4 Denver Broncos (8-8)

  • hasbeen
    Skyhook79;1045989 wrote:What part of back-up don't you understand? If he was so good he would be starting.

    Moreno and Willis have the exact same career yds per carry 4.1. Moreno is no slouch.

    Mcgahee is the better rb for this team
  • Skyhook79
    pnhasbeen;1046024 wrote:Mcgahee is the better rb for this team
    They are both good and you need at least 2 good RB's to not burn one out and wear down defenses.
  • hasbeen
    Skyhook79;1046043 wrote:They are both good and you need at least 2 good RB's to not burn one out and wear down defenses.

    Tebow and mcgahee.

    Moreno wouldn't affect the outcome. Ball is serviceable.
  • LJ
    pnhasbeen;1046065 wrote:Tebow and mcgahee.

    Moreno wouldn't affect the outcome. Ball is serviceable.

    Exactly. Moreno and Kuper wouldnt change a thing. Lol look at Skyhook trying to use meaningless injuries as an excuse as to why they lost to KC
  • Skyhook79
    LJ;1046129 wrote:Exactly. Moreno and Kuper wouldnt change a thing. Lol look at Skyhook trying to use meaningless injuries as an excuse as to why they lost to KC
    I didn't say anything about why they lost to KC, I was disputing your claim that they were not missing any key performers.
    Not surprised it went over your head though.
  • LJ
    Skyhook79;1046160 wrote:I didn't say anything about why they lost to KC, I was disputing your claim that they were not missing any key performers.
    Not surprised it went over your head though.

    Moreno, not key
    Kuper, not key
    Dawkins, not key to why they lost.

    Get it this time, or you going to start blabbering again?
  • hasbeen
    Skyhook79;1046160 wrote:I didn't say anything about why they lost to KC, I was disputing your claim that they were not missing any key performers.
    Not surprised it went over your head though.

    The only guy missing that might have mattered is Dawkins.

    Kupers back up did fine against the shit d line for pitt. Moreno, again, wouldn't have done little.
  • Skyhook79
    LJ;1046169 wrote:Moreno, not key
    Kuper, not key
    Dawkins, not key to why they lost.

    Get it this time, or you going to start blabbering again?
    Too bad you don't get to decide who is key and not key for Denver.
    Try and figure out why your team lost to an 8-8 team with Tim Tebow as the QB.
  • LJ
    Skyhook79;1046254 wrote:Too bad you don't get to decide who is key and not key for Denver.
    Try and figure out why your team lost to an 8-8 team with Tim Tebow as the QB.

    I already know why. Read the thread, I went over it a few times.

    And too bad your opinion means just as much as mine on who is and isnt a key player.
  • Ironman92
    * Every team has injuries that are key.

    * Denver deserved to win based on their performance....Denver was the better team.

    * Denver was uber smarter.

    * Pittsburgh had far more missing players/injury issues.

    Denying any of these things is ridiculous....but have at it.
  • Speedofsand
    Pitt had 5 starters out and a gimpy QB. Their leading tackler and 2 sudden losses on defense. Mendenhall, and Pouncey which I hated to see because Maurkice is really cool. What happened to Starks and Gilbert on Pitt's Oline?
  • wgh raider
    starks went out early with an injured knee that may require surgery.
  • Rotinaj
    Why are people arguing about the KC and Broncos game?
  • Skyhook79
    Rotinaj;1046701 wrote:Why are people arguing about the KC and Broncos game?
    Because LJ is bitter that the steelers lost to a team that 7-9 KC "kicked the shit out of" a week earlier.
  • LJ
    Skyhook79;1046707 wrote:Because LJ is bitter that the steelers lost to a team that 7-9 KC "kicked the shit out of" a week earlier.
    Not true at all....

    Way to make shit up :thumbup:

    But hey, whatever gets your Tebowner going again!
  • like_that
    Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    like_that;1046713 wrote:Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?
    better question, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and had a solid argument?
  • Skyhook79
    Raw Dawgin' it;1046724 wrote:better question, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and had a solid argument?
    Several times. The Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning argument comes to mind.
  • Skyhook79
    LJ;1046709 wrote:Not true at all....

    Way to make shit up :thumbup:

    But hey, whatever gets your Tebowner going again!
    Who brought up the KC vs Denver game in the steelers vs Broncos thread?:rolleyes:
  • Skyhook79
    like_that;1046713 wrote:Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?
    I suggest you go thru my 3595 posts and come up with a flow chart and in depth analysis.
  • LJ
    Skyhook79;1046772 wrote:Who brought up the KC vs Denver game in the steelers vs Broncos thread?:rolleyes:
    SoS
    Did I use it the last 3 weeks?
  • Skyhook79
    LJ;1046775 wrote:SoS did I use it the last 3 weeks
    Not seeing KC any where in that post. You chose to bring them in and you were wrong about having their key players.
  • LJ
    Skyhook79;1046790 wrote:Not seeing KC any where in that post. You chose to bring them in
    KC wasn't one of the last 3 they lost?
    and you were wrong about having their key players.
    Not at all. They had their QB, their top WR's, their top RB and not only 4/5's of their line, but a backup who is just plain good enough.
  • gorocks99
    [video=youtube;m5OAGHXc1ZU][/video]
  • Heretic
    like_that;1046713 wrote:Just curious, does anyone recall a time where skyhook has posted and not tried to be a douche and look for an argument?
    Sometimes, that's all a person has.