Archive

Pittsburgh Penguins 2010-2011 season thread

  • Raw Dawgin' it
    rock_knutne;671519 wrote:That hit was a COMPLETE blindside! You should quit now before you make yourself look like an even bigger douche!
    That's rich coming from a guy who was proven wrong about the trap by everyone who posts on here and is now calling me a douche for stating the obvious that you think a hit from behind was clean because the player could've known it was coming. You must delusional to think cooke isn't dirty and doesn't take runs at players. You're the one that looks like an ignorant douche for constantly making biased homer statements when you're clearly wrong.

    Also, the steckle hit was ruled incidental contact, no penalty was called. But since you're a pitt fan he obviously was out to hurt crosby.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    rock_knutne;671525 wrote:That's right.......ANYONE who puts on a Pittsburgh jersey from any of their sports teams is the best and can do no wrong!!!!!!!!!
    I know.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    Sure looks like an illegal check to me...and anyone else with half a brain

  • rock_knutne
    Raw Dawgin' it;671543 wrote:That's rich coming from a guy who was proven wrong about the trap by everyone who posts on here and is now calling me a douche for stating the obvious that you think a hit from behind was clean because the player could've known it was coming. You must delusional to think cooke isn't dirty and doesn't take runs at players. You're the one that looks like an ignorant douche for constantly making biased homer statements when you're clearly wrong.

    Also, the steckle hit was ruled incidental contact, no penalty was called. But since you're a pitt fan he obviously was out to hurt crosby.

    No, you and everyone else are dead WRONG on that issue!

    BTW, don't put words in my mouth pal, I never said Cooke was a squeaky clean player but as YOU usually do, you insert your foot in to your mouth!
  • rock_knutne
    Raw Dawgin' it;671555 wrote:Sure looks like an illegal check to me...and anyone else with half a brain


    LMFAO.......illegal? Because you posted a picture of this pussy with his back to Matt Cooke right before he hits him? You have a still frame of when that pussy looked back for Cooke? He knew he was coming and turned his back like a pussy. Figures you would defend a coward, perfect fit for you!
  • rock_knutne
    Raw Dawgin' it;671545 wrote:I know.
    ........and don't fucking forget it!
  • rock_knutne
    Enough of this BS on Matt Cooke, you either love or hate the guy and wish he was on your team.

    Pens host the LA Kings tomorrow night and then hit the road for four games with the last two in Chicago and Colorado; come home for two games against Washington and San Jose; then hit the road yet again for five games which ends in Boston. These next couple of weeks are going to be huge, if they can go .500 or better during this stretch it could provide a huge momentum swing for them.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    rock_knutne;671572 wrote:LMFAO.......illegal? Because you posted a picture of this pussy with his back to Matt Cooke right before he hits him? You have a still frame of when that pussy looked back for Cooke? He knew he was coming and turned his back like a pussy. Figures you would defend a coward, perfect fit for you!
    Here's ESPNs hockey analysts calling out cook too, but i guess they're probably wrong...seeing as they work for espn and all and they know nothing about hockey....
    http://espn.go.com/blog/nhl/post/_/id/4480/daily-debate-does-matt-cookes-latest-hit-warrant-suspension

    I'm not defending anyone by the way, i'll calling you our for defending a scum bag and the only reason you are is cause he's on your team. Hell, Bill Guerin called out Cooke last year for laying out savard, i'm sure he's an idiot though...smh
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    rock_knutne;671566 wrote:No, you and everyone else are dead WRONG on that issue!

    BTW, don't put words in my mouth pal, I never said Cooke was a squeaky clean player but as YOU usually do, you insert your foot in to your mouth!

    And so far you've brought nothing to the table except telling every they were wrong and you were right and that Tyutin is a p*ssy. Congrats, solid posts right there that don't sound bias and bring so much to the table.
  • End of Line
    Tyutin did look back but, it was a dumb decision Cooke made to hit him from behind.
  • like_that
    Oh, rock still proving his doesn't know what he is talking about? Ok.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    like_that;671770 wrote:Oh, rock still proving his doesn't know what he is talking about? Ok.
    As usual, he brings nothing to the table and just gets pissy when he's proven wrong.
  • TedSheckler
    Feet off the ice. Seems legal to me....emirite?

  • chicago510
    4 games for cooke...must have been legal right rock?
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    chicago510;671817 wrote:4 games for cooke...must have been legal right rock?
    +1
  • rock_knutne
    Radio is reporting Cooke will be suspended four games........what a crock of shit! This is a make up suspension for when he laid that fag Savard out like a rag doll and although THAT particular play was dirty, the hit was perfectly legal and with in the rules of the NHL at the time it happened. So know, the league fucked up the Savard hit and will take it out on Cooke for what was an absolute cowardly play by Tyutin.

    Yet, Crosby gets levelled TWICE and nothing happened. Where's the NHL Crosby conspiracy at now?
  • rock_knutne
    like_that;671770 wrote:Oh, rock still proving his doesn't know what he is talking about? Ok.
    Look who's here, the other troll who has his head constantly up rawdawg/coa's ass.
  • rock_knutne
    chicago510;671817 wrote:4 games for cooke...must have been legal right rock?

    There was absolutley nothing wrong with that hit, Tyutin is a fucking pussy, he knew Cooke was coming and turned his back. This is a make up call for the Savard hit.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    rock_knutne;671827 wrote:There was absolutley nothing wrong with that hit, Tyutin is a fucking pussy, he knew Cooke was coming and turned his back. This is a make up call for the Savard hit.
    NHL Rule 48 wasn't in place for the Savard hit, so nice fail there that this is a make up call. So pictures, video, espn analysts, and the nhl front office are ALL WRONG because as you put it "Tyutin is a pussy and savard is fag" and "cooke plays for pitt and he can do no wrong."

    You can't check from behind and you can't leave your feet. This is his 1st suspension since the savard hit. He laid out savard, tyutin, and stuck his knee out to hurt Ovie, he's lucky it was only 4 with his wrap sheet.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    rock_knutne;671823 wrote:Yet, Crosby gets levelled TWICE and nothing happened. Where's the NHL Crosby conspiracy at now?

    Sounds like sour grapes.
  • chicago510
    Imho it was a charging and a boarding penalty. Regardless if a guy sees you you can't hit him illegally. So if a guy sees your stick you can slash him? Four games seems like a lot but he is a repeat offender.
  • rock_knutne
    Raw Dawgin' it;671844 wrote:NHL Rule 48 wasn't in place for the Savard hit, so nice fail there that this is a make up call. So pictures, video, espn analysts, and the nhl front office are ALL WRONG because as you put it "Tyutin is a pussy and savard is fag" and "cooke plays for pitt and he can do no wrong."

    You can't check from behind and you can't leave your feet. This is his 1st suspension since the savard hit. He laid out savard, tyutin, and stuck his knee out to hurt Ovie, he's lucky it was only 4 with his wrap sheet.
    Raw Dawgin' it;671855 wrote:Sounds like sour grapes.

    Get a clue dumb ass or should I call you COA?

    Yeah, Ovechkin intentionally took Gonchar's knee out two years ago in the playoffs but that was perfectly legal right? Crosby gets nailed not once but twice, both plays are far away from the puck, that's legal right?

    BTW genius.......Rule 48 was implemented because of and right after Cooke took Savard out,which I said was a dirty play from the get go.

    Last thing...................you morons and your fail garbage, learn some fucking English and maybe you can make something out of your pathetic life! Now, take a long look at my avatar!
  • Automatik
    Dirty hit, and yes I agree the league is inconsistent with stuff like this. They must be taking notes from the NFL.
  • End of Line
    Rumor is flying around that SJ has interest in Goligoski. The rumor is Setoguchi+prospect for Goligoski.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    rock_knutne;671926 wrote:Get a clue dumb ass or should I call you COA?

    Yeah, Ovechkin intentionally took Gonchar's knee out two years ago in the playoffs but that was perfectly legal right? Crosby gets nailed not once but twice, both plays are far away from the puck, that's legal right?

    BTW genius.......Rule 48 was implemented because of and right after Cooke took Savard out,which I said was a dirty play from the get go.

    Last thing...................you morons and your fail garbage, learn some fucking English and maybe you can make something out of your pathetic life!
    Ha obviously you have nothing if you have to resort to calling me someone else.

    Well...those sour grapes are turning into whining. Never said the ovie hit on gonchar wasn't dirty, he's had his fair share. But the Cooke hit on Ovie and then a game later on Tyutin were both dirty. You're obviously just sore that there wasn't any front office action taken on the crosby hits. During the broadcast the announcers even said the hit from steckle was incidental (that's valid since you like to use announcers as a source).

    Also, if Cooke is the guy that caused rule 48, all the more reason for him to get suspended for repeat offenses. Even if he wasn't a repeat offender, it was a blind side hit (cause he hit him in the back, last i checked our eyes are in the front) and he left his feet...both are illegal, both led to his suspension on top of him being a filthy player.

    Also, you're the definition of fail garbage with what you bring to the table.