Browns interested in Kolb?

• Laley23

  

  he is just going to say it was his sources and not him. He covered his tracks well in this instance. I gotta give him credit here.
• like_that

  

  Laley23;494990 wrote:he is just going to say it was his sources and not him. He covered his tracks well in this instance. I gotta give him credit here.

  
  His left and right hand are not credible sources.
• Laley23

  

  As for Kolb. Heckert really wanted him when he was in Philly. Practically begged for the Eagles to draft him. If he still believes in him enough to try and trade, than I would be behind the thought process 100%. If Heckert didnt come from Philly and drafting Kolb, I wouldnt want to trade for him though.
• like_that

  

  Commander of Awesome;494985 wrote:KEEP SHOUTING AND REWORDING WHAT YOU SAID!! OMG!!!!!! LOUD NOISES!
  
  I bet you were shouting when you said this as well:
  
  
  
  'Nuff Said.

  
  LMAO! PWNED.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Commander of Awesome;494985 wrote:KEEP SHOUTING AND REWORDING WHAT YOU SAID!! OMG!!!!!! LOUD NOISES!
  
  I bet you were shouting when you said this as well:
  
  
  
  'Nuff Said.

  
  haha I thought that was actually a good picture of me for being shit housed, I won the argument though and you knows it!
• Commander of Awesome

  

  No you back tracked and reworded you statements. Thats the definition of losing a debate. See Capone.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Commander of Awesome;494917 wrote:The past regime, not the current regime which has a proven track record of success, see Matt Hasselbeck, Brett Farve, McNabb. I think our current regime as long as we send DaBoll and Womangini packing is capable of grooming a future QB.

  DeyDurkie5;494944 wrote: I agree this new regime is unproven in that regards

  
  I was agreeing with you that our new regime is unproven with the browns in grooming a qb, hence the reason I said "I AGREE"
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Dig deeper, you said we're incapable of developing a qb and thus should mortgage the future on Kolb. Which I pwned you and proved how thats a blanket bs statement. You're dense.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Commander of Awesome;495012 wrote:Dig deeper, you said we're incapable of developing a qb and thus should mortgage the future on Kolb. Which I pwned you and proved how thats a blanket bs statement. You're dense.

  
  I didn't say we should mortgage the future on Kolb, I said get Kolb to produce consistency in the offense. Quit putting words in my mouth. I said what is wrong with getting Kolb and getting a qb after some consistency is established? As a browns fan(a confrontational/roided out one at that), would you not agree that is somewhat what the browns need?
• Art Modell

  

  like_that;494986 wrote:Here you go Capone. Do you enjoy being the biggest dumb ass on this forum? You are light years ahead of gibby when it comes to stupidity, and that is pretty sad.

  
  Can you read dipshit. Seriously, can you fucking read. Did I say he was overated? And my next post I said I would like the Steelers to have him. duh duh duh duh duh duh duh
• like_that

  

  Art Modell;495022 wrote:Can you read dipshit. Seriously, can you fucking read. Did I say he was overated? And my next post I said I would like the Steelers to have him. duh duh duh duh duh duh duh

  
  First of all, LOL at you trying to insinuate (see dictionary for definition) that me or anyone else on this forum has reading comprehension trouble. Yes I can read, you asked if we could prove that you said JT is overrated. I did by posting your quote.
  
  Now of course you are trying to backtrack and emphasize that you support JT in your other posts. If you support JT, then why did you originally post that he is overrated? If you weren't trying to imply that he is overrated, then why did you even post it? Oh wait, we all already know the answer to both of those questions; you are a dumb fuck troll.
• BR1986FB

  Haha...this was great fun reading back over the posts I missed yesterday. Still don't want Kolb.
• buckeyes_woowee

  Well! Hello everyone! I haven't been on in sometime but it sure is nice to see that the world's biggest dipshit is still around!
• BR1986FB

  buckeyes_woowee;495204 wrote:Well! Hello everyone! I haven't been on in sometime but it sure is nice to see that the world's biggest dipshit is still around!

  
  I'm confused. Are you referring to Capone or Dynasty?
• thedynasty1998

  

  BR1986FB;494449 wrote:Hey, stupid mother fucker...you're the one who said, and I quote "QB - Delhomme - one of the worst 3 QB's in NFL." I don't see one of the 3 worst STARTING QB's in the NFL. I see "QB - Delhomme - one of the worst 3 QB's in NFL." So I don't want to hear your "semantics" bullshit after I post this. He can mention TWO guys from the SAME team or TWO backups because they are ALL worse than Delhomme.

  
  Hey you stupid mother fucker (see I can act like an internet bully too), I was discussing the starters, so it was implied you moron. Plus, when the argument was being made, only starters were mentioned you simple minded fuck.
  
  If you want me to make it as simple as can be, I will. Delhomme is one of the worst three opening day starting QB's. Hope that is simple enough for a moron like you. Not even sure how you can argue that statement.
  

  BR1986FB;495243 wrote:I'm confused. Are you referring to Capone or Dynasty?

  You are such a blind homer it's hilarious. You are still butt hurt over Lebron and try to defend a team who lacks any real talent. I had a discussion last night with three friends all of which are Browns fans and I told them what I said on here and they all agreed on Delhomme and the fact that the Browns have absolutely no talent other than a couple players. How many players for the Browns would start on some of the elite teams in the NFL? Thomas, that's the only one. Cribbs, but he's a special teamer and everyone is going to keep the ball out of his hands this year anyways, so his value is somewhat limited.
  
  It's sad that there are people on here so simple minded that they can't deal with reality. And the fact that you put me in the same category as Capone is laughable.
• thedynasty1998

  

  DeyDurkie5;495018 wrote:I didn't say we should mortgage the future on Kolb, I said get Kolb to produce consistency in the offense. Quit putting words in my mouth. I said what is wrong with getting Kolb and getting a qb after some consistency is established? As a browns fan(a confrontational/roided out one at that), would you not agree that is somewhat what the browns need?

  
  The Browns cannot rebuild until they have a QB of the future. Kolb is that. I don't think the Eagles even deal him in the first place, but for a Browns fan to say they don't want Kolb is hilarious. You would rather have the Browns draft a backup CB next year or a center? The NFL is built around the QB's and the Browns need someone to hang their hat on. I know it's not going to be Kolb, but I don't know why anyone would think Luck will be any better.
  
  Now Mallett is a different story, because I think he will be an elite QB in the NFL.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  How many more times can you say "simple minded". You put yourself in that category with Capone, so nice FAIL there. BTW I named more than 3 starters worse than Delhomme, but if "3 friends (LMAO like you have 3 friends, no one is buying that BS)" said differently than well by god, they must be right. LOL only an idiot like you can think that a fictional converstaion outside of this board that you had would have any bearing on the discussion in this thread. Nice FAIL trying to use it to prove your point.
• thedynasty1998

  

  Yea a conversation outside of a message board is pointless. I've heard it all now.
  
  And if you would not be so simple minded, you would know that I said it was my opinion on Delhomme, and asked for others opinions. And then you throw out 2 QB's from the same team and 2 backups. Sorry, but that is a "FAIL" (how many times can you FAIL?).
  
  That's hilarious that I don't have 3 friends. How old are we again? This forum used to be a discussion amongst adults, but now we resort to saying someone doesn't have 3 friends. Kind of sad, honestly, the quality of discussion that comes from a few posters.
• BR1986FB

  Commander of Awesome;495285 wrote:How many more times can you say "simple minded".

  
  You forgot "butt hurt." Seems that's on his mind 24/7. He must be taking the high hard one on a regular basis.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  OK you want to go first game starters then huh? Jason Campbell, Matt Moore, Brett Farve, Trent Edwards, Matt Cassell and Mark Sanchez all has worse games. Good god the idiocy (see dictionary) in your statements is on a whole new level. Then Delhomme got hurt, otherwise he would still be our starter, unlike a few other QBs named who were benched.
  
  I was pointing out that youre an idiot loser who doesnt have any friends. Thus trying to act like you do wasn't fooling any one. Plus you cant find 3 other people in this world as dellusional as you are, thus that conversation was a fabrication (see dictionary).
  
  Not simple minded fool, I just dont go off of what trolls like Capone say, I actually watch the games.
• thedynasty1998

  

  So you honestly can say that you think Delhomme is better than Cassel, Sanchez and Favre?
  
  The other three I would necessarily agree with, but I can see that as a legit argument.
  
  You are so clever with your friends comments. You are right, I don't have any friends.
  
  With that said, I will just go back to ignoring you. I thought over a couple months you might have matured, but sadly that's not the case. The whole Cleveland short man syndrome is just really pathetic.
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Yes I would rather have Delhomme this season over Matt Cassel, he sucks. Sanchez I dont know, he was horrible week 1, much better week 2. Jury is still out on him IMO (Dynasty, that means its my opinion [see definition]). Farve is a 3x MVP and a HOFer, obviously he is better than Delhomme, but based on your dumb ass criteria he is worse and thus a bottom 3 "starting QB" in this league.
  
  Yeah you're right, the short inadequate dumbass 5 yr ashland undergrad degree syndrome is much more appealing.
• Art Modell

  

  I think it's safe to say that the 3 Browns qbs could not start for any other team in the NFL. NUFF SAID.
• BR1986FB

  Art Modell;495339 wrote:I think it's safe to say that the 3 Browns qbs could not start for any other team in the NFL. NUFF SAID.

  
  I think it's safe to say, AS USUAL, you're wrong.
• Art Modell

  

  BR1986FB;495345 wrote:I think it's safe to say, AS USUAL, you're wrong.

  
  Again, No facts to back up your homer blindness.