Ohio Chatter DEV

MontyBrunswick

posts are under a certain thumbs up/down threshold should be hidden by default

justincredible

Automatik;1867315 wrote:Will the new format entice new members and further quality discussion? plmk

Well, it will be more welcoming visually. I also plan on sending out an email blast to all past members as well, hopefully a few will stick around. The rest is on the community.

justincredible

MontyBrunswick;1867327 wrote:posts are under a certain thumbs up/down threshold should be hidden by default

I've seen that pattern before and I'm considering it.

salto

justincredible;1867271 wrote:I like that he called you a nerd when I'm the guy that just bought a new keyboard and am updating you all on the progress of a new website I'm building.

Asking for the sticky thread about your nerdism Justin, means he's one of you. The definition of compatible has nothing to do with like_that's nerdity.

superman

justincredible;1867378 wrote:I've seen that pattern before and I'm
considering it.

I vote no. Let the stupidity of people like Turdo be out there for all the world to see.

CenterBHSFan

Color customization, please! I hate only having 3 or 4 colors to choose from. I don't even know if it's possible with what you're building, but if it can be done that'd be groovy.

ernest_t_bass

I like Tapatalk, so that is disappointing. But I also don't pay the bills, so... I'll learn to adapt.

justincredible

superman;1867415 wrote:I vote no. Let the stupidity of people like Turdo be out there for all the world to see.

It might end up being a setting you can toggle to show/hide stupid posts.

gut

Holy crap. OC in spanish?!? I thought Trump was getting rid of all the illegals....

New site upgrade? Wow, I guess adsense revenues from all those new posters is really burning a hole in your pocket.

justincredible

CenterBHSFan;1867420 wrote:Color customization, please! I hate only having 3 or 4 colors to choose from. I don't even know if it's possible with what you're building, but if it can be done that'd be groovy.

It's possible, but lower priority. I'm sure it will happen, it will just be well after launch.

justincredible

ernest_t_bass;1867422 wrote:I like Tapatalk, so that is disappointing. But I also don't pay the bills, so... I'll learn to adapt.

I think tapatalk is fine, but it's still pretty buggy and unnecessary if the site is built with mobile in mind.

Ironman92

Justin...check you FB messenger pls

justincredible

Ironman92;1867442 wrote:Justin...check you FB messenger pls

I saw it on my phone, waiting to login on a computer to respond. I'm having password issues at the moment, but I'll be getting back to you soon.

O-Trap

I like the simplified design.

I'm probably the only person on here who doesn't prefer Tapatalk when I'm on my phone, but I admit that the site itself is a little annoying when it's not mobile-responsive.

superman

O-Trap;1867482 wrote:I like the simplified design.

I'm probably the only person on here who doesn't prefer Tapatalk when I'm on my phone, but I admit that the site itself is a little annoying when it's not mobile-responsive.

I only use the site on my phone and I don't have tapatalk. I've had zero issues.

O-Trap

superman;1867486 wrote:I only use the site on my phone and I don't have tapatalk. I've had zero issues.

I'm currently using it on my phone. I'm not saying it can't be done or that it's particularly difficult. But at present, if you want to see the whole page, the text is pretty small, because it's not responsive.

O-Trap

Iliketurtles

O-Trap;1867482 wrote:I'm probably the only person on here who doesn't prefer Tapatalk when I'm on my phone, but I admit that the site itself is a little annoying when it's not mobile-responsive.

I've never used Tapatalk once. I think there are a few others on here who also don't use it.

BRF

Iliketurtles;1867519 wrote:I've never used Tapatalk once. I think there are a few others on here who also don't use it.

Same.

Commander of Awesome

O-Trap;1867482 wrote:I like the simplified design.

I'm probably the only person on here who doesn't prefer Tapatalk when I'm on my phone, but I admit that the site itself is a little annoying when it's not mobile-responsive.

I prefer laptop to phone. I rarely post on my phone, including tapatalk.

O-Trap

Commander of Awesome;1867521 wrote:I prefer laptop to phone. I rarely post on my phone, including tapatalk.

To be fair, this is true of me too, but I'm convinced that part of the reason I don't do it on my phone is that it's less convenient to do so.

justincredible

Just to ease your mind, the site will be 100% responsive. It will look good on a phone, a tablet, and a regular sized monitor.

It's mostly responsive as of now, I just have to tweak some positioning of the user information on individual posts. In the screenshot below, the final version will be vertical (userinfo on top, post on bottom) instead of horizontal.

vball10set

Iliketurtles;1867519 wrote:I've never used Tapatalk once. I think there are a few others on here who also don't use it.

BRF;1867520 wrote:Same.

ditto

justincredible

I see tapatalk being beneficial in two scenarios.

1. You're a member of a forum that has a crappy mobile view (see: this place)
2. You're an active member of several forums that are all available on tapatalk.

It's a lot easier to just use the site itself if it's actually built for mobile, as you'll get all of the functionality, not just what tapatalk allows.

O-Trap

justincredible;1867532 wrote:Just to ease your mind, the site will be 100% responsive. It will look good on a phone, a tablet, and a regular sized monitor.

It's mostly responsive as of now, I just have to tweak some positioning of the user information on individual posts. In the screenshot below, the final version will be vertical (userinfo on top, post on bottom) instead of horizontal.

Teh secks.

Archive

OC 2.0 progress thread