Archive

sleeper vs the boomers

  • sleeper
    HitsRus;1540879 wrote:http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_08.html

    2008 election stats.

    http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_12.html

    2012 election stats.

    Ha Ha Ha...its all the boomers fault! LOL.

    http://www.people-press.org/2011/11/03/the-generation-gap-and-the-2012-election-3/

    I could just go on and on.

    LMFAO at the snotty nosed puppy and his delusions about "his generation".
    95% of those in office are Boomers. Obama = Boomer, Bush = Boomer. LOL
  • sleeper
    wghfan;1540881 wrote:You think you know it all generation, is just a bunch of fuck ups.
    The reality is, these "fuck ups" will not pay for your retirement. Hope you saved enough! LOL
  • BR1986FB
    sleeper;1540920 wrote:The reality is, these "fuck ups" will not pay for your retirement. Hope you saved enough! LOL
    You must have been born via "immaculate conception" since one would assume that these "fuck ups" include your parents. :huh:
  • Tiernan
    BR1986FB;1540926 wrote:You must have been born via "immaculate conception" since one would assume that these "fuck ups" include your parents. :huh:
    Any armchair psychologist could tell you Sleepy has "mommy issues" so his hate for the greatest generation is not a surprise at all.
  • BR1986FB
    Tiernan;1540937 wrote:Any armchair psychologist could tell you Sleepy has "mommy issues" so his hate for the greatest generation is not a surprise at all.
    Don't know anything about that but would be curious to see if he considers his parents "fuck ups."
  • sleeper
    BR1986FB;1540948 wrote:Don't know anything about that but would be curious to see if he considers his parents "fuck ups."
    No I don't consider them fuckups. They are very aware of the burden that has been placed on my generation and they listen to me regarding political candidates(I got both of them into Ron Paul).

    Those who do not listen to me are considered fuck ups, regardless of the generation.
  • BR1986FB
    sleeper;1540997 wrote:No I don't consider them fuckups. They are very aware of the burden that has been placed on my generation and they listen to me regarding political candidates(I got both of them into Ron Paul).

    Those who do not listen to me are considered fuck ups, regardless of the generation.
    They are obviously "fuck ups" if they're boomers.

    /sleeper'd
  • sleeper
    BR1986FB;1540999 wrote:They are obviously "fuck ups" if they're boomers.

    /sleeper'd
    They know of my general distaste for their generation however seemingly agree with me point of view. Amazing how logic and reason can permeate even the mind of a boomer. Let me know when you are ready to accept your failures.
  • Tiernan
    They're definitely fuck ups for raising the likes of you. You strike me as an only-child...amirite? Possibly even adopted?
  • BR1986FB
    sleeper;1541001 wrote:They know of my general distaste for their generation however seemingly agree with me point of view. Amazing how logic and reason can permeate even the mind of a boomer. Let me know when you are ready to accept your failures.
    There can be NO exceptions. I'm assuming they are > 45 years old = "fuck ups." Don't backpedal. Regardless of how hard you try, you can't get out of this one. If your parents are older than 45, you just called them "fuck ups."
  • Fab4Runner
    Tiernan;1541004 wrote:They're definitely fuck ups for raising the likes of you. You strike me as an only-child...amirite? Possibly even adopted?
    Wrong and wrong.
  • sleeper
    BR1986FB;1541003 wrote:There can be NO exceptions. I'm assuming they are > 45 years old = "fuck ups." Don't backpedal. Regardless of how hard you try, you can't get out of this one. If your parents are older than 45, you just called them "fuck ups."
    I think they would probably agree that they are fuck ups given my criteria. My parents are rational thinkers. Not sure why you are so butt hurt on the classification of my parents but I do find it funny that you are unable to rationally debate any of the points brought up in this thread. I mean, I don't blame you given the impossibility of debating a topic in which you are grossly wrong, but an effort would be appreciated.
  • sleeper
    Tiernan;1541004 wrote:They're definitely fuck ups for raising the likes of you. You strike me as an only-child...amirite? Possibly even adopted?
    Not adopted and I have siblings; both of them more successful than I am(albeit older).
  • BR1986FB
    Just pointed out that you seem to hold your parents & their age group in such high regard.
  • sleeper
    BR1986FB;1541018 wrote:Just pointed out that you seem to hold your parents & their age group in such high regard.
    Well yeah they are my parents. They raised me the correct way and for that I am thankful.

    However, that doesn't excuse their share of the irresponsible burdening of unborn generations and the destruction of the worlds greatest super power just so they can have a retirement better than that of cattle.

    I am willing to accept a reasonable increase in FICA contributions to help save this country however I am only willing to do so with a reduction in retirement benefits from the worthless generation. For example, a 10% increase in FICA contributions will have to correspond with a 15-20% reduction in retirement benefits.
  • Tiernan
    sleeper;1541017 wrote:Not adopted and I have siblings; both of them more successful than I am(albeit older).

    Something odd about the way you've stated the above...you're hiding something.
  • sleeper
    HitsRus;1540879 wrote:http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_08.html

    2008 election stats.

    http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_12.html

    2012 election stats.

    Ha Ha Ha...its all the boomers fault! LOL.

    http://www.people-press.org/2011/11/03/the-generation-gap-and-the-2012-election-3/

    I could just go on and on.

    LMFAO at the snotty nosed puppy and his delusions about "his generation".
    * In the Iowa poll, Paul gets more than 50 percent support from the two youngest age groups — 18-29 year olds and 30-44 year olds — but gets less than 12 percent of 45-64 year olds and those 65 and older. In the Post poll, he gets 20 percent among 18-49 year olds, but just 8 percent among those 50 and older. That’s a remarkable age gap.
    Another reason to support Ron Paul, 88% of Boomers don't like him.
  • thavoice
    sleeper;1541017 wrote:Not adopted and I have siblings; both of them more successful than I am(albeit older).
    They own TWO McDonalds'?
  • pmoney25
    LMAO that Romney/Mccain were good candidates. Those were the Boomer nominees.

    The eventual takeover of the Republican party will be because of the younger generations and it can't happen soon enough.
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1541082 wrote:Another reason to support Ron Paul, 88% of Boomers don't like him.

    Is Ron Paul running again? Is he seeking the Republican nomination or going Independent this time?
  • Tiernan
    Vast majority of Younger DBs think voting Republican makes them anti-environment, anti-abortion, pro war and anti - media, when my generation is gone this country is fucked.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1541103 wrote:Is Ron Paul running again? Is he seeking the Republican nomination or going Independent this time?
    He will not be running again. His message will likely be trumpeted by another candidate though.
  • sleeper
    Tiernan;1541108 wrote:Vast majority of Younger DBs think voting Republican makes them anti-environment, anti-abortion, pro war and anti - media, when my generation is gone this country is fucked.
    Actually the faster you boomers die off the better off this country will be.
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1541123 wrote:He will not be running again. His message will likely be trumpeted by another candidate though.

    DO you expect such a candidate to run as an independent or seek one of the two big party's nomination?
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1541139 wrote:DO you expect such a candidate to run as an independent or seek one of the two big party's nomination?
    I think the only way to do it is to win one of the big two parties nominations. Gary Johnson won't get anywhere in the Republican party; leaving Rand Paul as the only one that has a chance.

    What we really need is for all these boomers to die off so we can get this country back on track.