Idaho Teacher Fired Over Facebook Photo

• pmoney25

  

  His hand is on her boob that is covered up by clothing(although not much). Im not even talking about the whole firing thing or even that it is posted on Facebook, just the Morality police who would think of something like this to be immoral or even immature really.
• WebFire

  Glory Days;1532389 wrote:Sorry, the internet isn't private.

  Correct, I clarified what I meant.
• pmoney25

  

  gut;1532486 wrote:and too stupid to understand decorum and good taste

  
  What is so bad about the picture?
• Manhattan Buckeye

  pmoney25;1532503 wrote:What is so bad about the picture?

  "Bad" isn't necessarily the word, it is more like inappropriate. I would never touch my wife like that in a public setting. And I certainly wouldn't post a photo of it with no expectation of privacy. No one is being hurt in the photo, no harm is being done. But that doesn't mean it should be publicized.
• WebFire

  ccrunner609;1532504 wrote:As an educator. online activity should be limited and conservative. When you go into that profession it is known that you cant do that. You cant portray anything that may be negatively viewed.
  
  The lady is an idiot and got what she deserved.

  Sure you have to be careful. And she was asked to take it down and complied. The firing was out of line.
• pmoney25

  

  Have you ever been dancing with your wife? Whether at party, wedding reception, concert, or out on a date? Chances are you have done something more inappropriate in public than this picture. I suppose you could only slow dance and be at arms length away at all times.
  
  I'm not sure they expected privacy, I have no issue with the school firing them since they do have that right as an employer. I do think it is stupid to fire them for that but they do have the right.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  No, not boob touching in public. I might have touched my wife's rear end a few times when we were out with friends.
  
  "Chances are you have done something more inappropriate in public than this picture"
  
  No. It is a solid 100% no.
  
  -edit, my wife would divorce me if I posted a pic on Facebook like that.
• WebFire

  Manhattan Buckeye;1532514 wrote:No, not boob touching in public. I might have touched my wife's rear end a few times when we were out with friends.
  

  Fired.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  It was quick enough that there wouldn't be a photo!
  
  These people posed for it.
• pmoney25

  

  So touching her rear end is not offensive but touching a boob is? Ok, that makes sense.
• pmoney25

  

  Ill never understand why people are so afraid of boobs in this country.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  We didn't pose for a picture and address it on the world wide web. Private matters should be that. I've definitely been amorous with my wife but it is kissing and hugging and a playful action.
  
  there is no way she would allow me to do what is in the photo, and certainly wouldn't allow me to post it for everyone to see.
• Pick6

  

  pmoney25;1532521 wrote:Ill never understand why people are so afraid of boobs in this country.

  nobody is afraid of boobs.
• pmoney25

  

  Manhattan Buckeye;1532523 wrote:We didn't pose for a picture and address it on the world wide web. Private matters should be that. I've definitely been amorous with my wife but it is kissing and hugging and a playful action.
  
  there is no way she would allow me to do what is in the photo, and certainly wouldn't allow me to post it for everyone to see.

  So people seeing you do that in public in real time is not bad, but posting a picture of it would be?
• pmoney25

  

  Pick6;1532527 wrote:nobody is afraid of boobs.

  Then why do people get so offended and have people fired? Obviously someone was offended that he grabbed her boob in the picture.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  Yes. There is a difference. Because no one sees us. The picture is a memorialization.
• OSH

  

  How does that saying go, "it's only illegal if you get caught?"
• Manhattan Buckeye

  It is the George Costanza defense. It isn't a lie if you believe it.
• Glory Days

  

  WebFire;1532502 wrote:Correct, I clarified what I meant.

  yeah I was catching up on the thread later and saw.....then was too lazy to delete my post haha
• said_aouita

  

  ccrunner609;1532504 wrote:As an educator. online activity should be limited and conservative. .

  
  Says the racist.
• GOONx19

  

  ccrunner609;1532504 wrote:As an educator. online activity should be limited and conservative. When you go into that profession it is known that you cant do that. You cant portray anything that may be negatively viewed.

  I just spit my water. Lol. This guy posted a picture of his asshole on here.
• hasbeen

  

  Manhattan Buckeye;1532514 wrote:
  
  
  -edit, my wife would divorce me if I posted a pic on Facebook like that.

  sounds like your wife is a bitch and your relationship sucks.
• Mulva

  

  pmoney25;1532528 wrote:So people seeing you do that in public in real time is not bad, but posting a picture of it would be?

  That's the part I don't understand, too.
  
  Same with the bikini picture. It's fine if people see you in person wearing the bikini, but not if people see the exact same image in digital form? It's baffling.
• Manhattan Buckeye

  hasbeen;1532593 wrote:sounds like your wife is a bitch and your relationship sucks.

  No, she just knows what is appropriate for public viewing and what isn't.
• WebFire

  Manhattan Buckeye;1532598 wrote:No, she just knows what is appropriate for public viewing and what isn't.

  Sounds a bit uptight to me.