Archive

Anyone can troll a website, but it takes talent to troll a whole town

  • 2kool4skool
    OSH;1150312 wrote:Woohoo! Do it...you won't regret it.

    Might as well "Ignore User" as well, makes things a lot easier on this forum.
  • OSH
    tcarrier32;1150341 wrote:I'm assuming it would be the people who believe that a supernatural being impregnated a virgin in order to sacrifice himself, to himself, in order to save them from the sin he condemned them to.

    HERPY DERPY DERPY DURRR

    Your attempt to explain the history of science (especially its attempts at dating the earth) is so god damn funny. I wish you were kidding, because this is such a great example of Poe's Law its astonishing. That entire third paragraph is about the dumbest thing I have ever read. Kudos, you rant like a five year old. Care link us to the scientist who, just four years ago, claimed the earth was 20M years old, only to change their calculations every year?
    You must not like to carry on discussions either.

    Who says that four years ago a scientist claimed the earth was 20 million years old? I simply stated that it has been stated that way. And it continues to change quite regularly. More regularly than what it should if science (in dating the earth) is accurate. As I stated earlier, even a +/- of 500 million years is considered acceptable? That is lousy. Please, someone tell me how a +/- of 500 million years is considered acceptable.

    There are WAY too many variables to actually lead to any "results" from the scientific dating processes. These variables will continue to play a role in the dating attempts. Needless to say, we will NEVER know how old the earth is -- who is going to verify it? Why "trust" a man-created date we will never know, and in essence, really has NO bearing on life as we know it?
  • sleeper
    OSH;1150378 wrote:You must not like to carry on discussions either.

    Who says that four years ago a scientist claimed the earth was 20 million years old? I simply stated that it has been stated that way. And it continues to change quite regularly. More regularly than what it should if science (in dating the earth) is accurate. As I stated earlier, even a +/- of 500 million years is considered acceptable? That is lousy. Please, someone tell me how a +/- of 500 million years is considered acceptable.

    There are WAY too many variables to actually lead to any "results" from the scientific dating processes. These variables will continue to play a role in the dating attempts. Needless to say, we will NEVER know how old the earth is -- who is going to verify it? Why "trust" a man-created date we will never know, and in essence, really has NO bearing on life as we know it?
    It hasn't changed since the 1950's at the latest. And its not disagreed upon by 500 million years, at worst is 100 million years, but I see rationality doesn't fit in with your hyperbole and general BS.

    We will NEVER know if you're God exists either. The difference is, no one is basing the existence/lifestyle on the unknowns of our world, unlike you, who "knows" that God exists and that God created the Earth 6000 years ago.

    Apparently, discussion cannot take place if someone disagrees with you. Like I've said, this isn't a debate, this is calling out the believers for the fraud they peddle and the illogical sickening loopholes they use to justify an erroneous belief system for their irrelevant lives.
  • tcarrier32
    OSH;1150378 wrote:You must not like to carry on discussions either.

    Who says that four years ago a scientist claimed the earth was 20 million years old? I simply stated that it has been stated that way. And it continues to change quite regularly. More regularly than what it should if science (in dating the earth) is accurate. As I stated earlier, even a +/- of 500 million years is considered acceptable? That is lousy. Please, someone tell me how a +/- of 500 million years is considered acceptable.

    There are WAY too many variables to actually lead to any "results" from the scientific dating processes. These variables will continue to play a role in the dating attempts. Needless to say, we will NEVER know how old the earth is -- who is going to verify it? Why "trust" a man-created date we will never know, and in essence, really has NO bearing on life as we know it?
    It has plenty of bearing on life as we "know" it. Maybe not now, but in the future it will 100% matter. If we stopped seeking answers to questions which we cannot currently understand the importance of, then society as we know it would grind to a halt.

    Your continued blubbering about radiometric dating is awesome. Those margins of error are acceptable due to the nature of the testing. 4.5B years is a long time.

    Anyways, you keep disputing science (by using a computer, hehe), and I'll keep disputing religion. I'll continue on my merry way, and good luck doing anything productive without all that heathen technology that science fucked up so bad it doesn't work.

  • rmolin73
    Actually it is a debate and aside from your mindless drivel a healthy one. I wear pants, jmog, osh and others are giving their views and like grown men they are disagreeing. You on the other hand like the immature child that you are continue your weak act.
  • sleeper
    What is there to debate? There's fact vs. an illogical regressive belief system backed by faith and faith alone.
  • sleeper
    tcarrier32;1150393 wrote:It has plenty of bearing on life as we "know" it. Maybe not now, but in the future it will 100% matter. If we stopped seeking answers to questions which we cannot currently understand the importance of, then society as we know it would grind to a halt.

    Your continued blubbering about radiometric dating is awesome. Those margins of error are acceptable due to the nature of the testing. 4.5B years is a long time.

    Anyways, you keep disputing science (by using a computer, hehe), and I'll keep disputing religion. I'll continue on my merry way, and good luck doing anything productive without all that heathen technology that science fucked up so bad it doesn't work.

    God didn't do that, that was free will. Come on, haven't you been paying attention?

    If something good happens, its a blessing and part of God's plan. If something bad happens, it's your free will and you have a choice to follow God's plan.
  • Con_Alma
    Doesn't everyone have that choice? Having free will to choose doesn't make people any more intelligent than not believing people have free will.
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1150141 wrote:I do wish to use logic. Logic dictates that your god existing is highly unlikely. Unfortunately, your side disregards logic when convenient and wants the other side to only use logic.

    Faith is a cop out. Faith is irrational. Faith is what your entire life is based on. Enjoy!
    What is it that faith is copping out from?

    It doesn't have to be rational.

    My entire life isn't based on faith, but certainly my eternal life is.

    I do enjoy very much. Thank you.
  • Skyhook79
    tcarrier32;1150393 wrote:It has plenty of bearing on life as we "know" it. Maybe not now, but in the future it will 100% matter. If we stopped seeking answers to questions which we cannot currently understand the importance of, then society as we know it would grind to a halt.

    Your continued blubbering about radiometric dating is awesome. Those margins of error are acceptable due to the nature of the testing. 4.5B years is a long time.

    Anyways, you keep disputing science (by using a computer, hehe), and I'll keep disputing religion. I'll continue on my merry way, and good luck doing anything productive without all that heathen technology that science fucked up so bad it doesn't work.

    http://www.baliblog.com/travel-tips/bali-daily/the-ceremony-of-eka-dasa-rudra-bali.html

    What does that event have to do with God/Jesus?
  • enigmaax
    Skyhook79;1150468 wrote:http://www.baliblog.com/travel-tips/bali-daily/the-ceremony-of-eka-dasa-rudra-bali.html

    What does that event have to do with God/Jesus?
    Clearly the Christian God killed them all on account of their poor worshipping choices. Chalk one up for the Good Guy!!
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1150439 wrote:What is it that faith is copping out from?

    It doesn't have to be rational.

    My entire life isn't based on faith, but certainly my eternal life is.

    I do enjoy very much. Thank you.
    Faith as a way to prove or back a belief. You can have faith that your belief is correct, but in reality, that does not make it correct.

    And by professing that faith, your decision making, time, dedication, effort, etc. are certainly a large component of your life. So your life has to be based on faith, which is irrational and illogical.

    Now, is this legal? Absolutely, and it should be. Should any of your beliefs be placed in the government? No. So let gays marry, let people have abortions, sell alcohol on Sundays, teach contraception and evolution in schools, etc. This is the way society should be, but since it isn't, the believers deserve all the shit they get.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1150438 wrote:Doesn't everyone have that choice? Having free will to choose doesn't make people any more intelligent than not believing people have free will.
    I don't see what a choice has to do with granting certain individuals status over the others he created.

    So let me get this straight. God created us to have a choice to worship him, so that when we die, we can go up to Heaven and live with him. Why not just skip sending us to Earth and ask right at "soul creation"(or whatever magic you want to call it) if you want to follow god. If you do, heaven. If you don't, hell. Seems to make way more sense.
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1150529 wrote:I don't see what a choice has to do with granting certain individuals status over the others he created.

    So let me get this straight. God created us to have a choice to worship him, so that when we die, we can go up to Heaven and live with him. Why not just skip sending us to Earth and ask right at "soul creation"(or whatever magic you want to call it) if you want to follow god. If you do, heaven. If you don't, hell. Seems to make way more sense.
    Status is not granted to anyone....choice is.

    Why create anything at all? ...He wanted to.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1150539 wrote:Status is not granted to anyone....choice is.

    Why create anything at all? ...He wanted to.
    Status is granted by that choice.

    He wanted to? For what purpose? Does this not concern you?
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1150526 wrote:Faith as a way to prove or back a belief. You can have faith that your belief is correct, but in reality, that does not make it correct....
    sleeper;1150526 wrote:....I am not trying to prove anything to anyone. That's not for me to do. Faith exists in my spiritual eternity. I have no faith in people here. They don't have a Holy spirit to grant me the faith in them. When it comes to people, mortal elements, it is not faith that assists in my decisions for they are not the same as eternity to me.

    And by professing that faith, your decision making, time, dedication, effort, etc. are certainly a large component of your life. So your life has to be based on faith, which is irrational and illogical.

    Now, is this legal? Absolutely, and it should be. Should any of your beliefs be placed in the government? No. So let gays marry, let people have abortions, sell alcohol on Sundays, teach contraception and evolution in schools, etc. This is the way society should be, but since it isn't, the believers deserve all the **** they get.
    What ****do believers get? I can't remember ever getting any ****.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    Soooo who created god?
  • Con_Alma
    sleeper;1150541 wrote:Status is granted by that choice.

    He wanted to? For what purpose? Does this not concern you?
    It not a status at all. It is a state af being that you get to choose.

    Why for would you assume there was a purpose? I don't know that there was.

    It does not concern me. Why should it? I go to choose my eternal state.
  • Con_Alma
    Raw Dawgin' it;1150547 wrote:Soooo who created god?
    Do you know that God was created? I don't.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    Con_Alma;1150551 wrote:Do you know that God was created? I don't.
    Never mind - you don't take questions for what they mean rather you take every word at it's literal meaning to make your argument. It's impossible to have a discussion with you....you and sleeper were made for each other.
  • Con_Alma
    Raw Dawgin' it;1150556 wrote:Never mind - you don't take questions for what they mean rather you take every word at it's literal meaning to make your argument. It's impossible to have a discussion with you....you and sleeper were made for each other.
    My gosh I hope I wasn't having an argument at all.

    I truly don't know what you "mean" by your question other than what it said. Sorry.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1150545 wrote:What ****do believers get? I can't remember ever getting any ****.
    Free bread and wine at mass.

    Oh excuse me, the body and blood of Christ. Get real.
  • enigmaax
    Con_Alma;1150539 wrote:Status is not granted to anyone....choice is.
    Doesn't that pretty much make us pawns in some kind of game? Choose right and I'll take care of you forever. Choose wrong and fuck you and your soul.
  • sleeper
    Con_Alma;1150549 wrote:It not a status at all. It is a state af being that you get to choose.

    Why for would you assume there was a purpose? I don't know that there was.

    It does not concern me. Why should it? I go to choose my eternal state.
    So God created people to worship him. Sounds awesome.
  • sleeper
    enigmaax;1150563 wrote:Doesn't that pretty much make us pawns in some kind of game? Choose right and I'll take care of you forever. Choose wrong and fuck you and your soul.
    And out of the 1000's of religions out there, I sure hope he chose right. If there is a God, he's surely a jealous one considering half the 10 commandments have to deal with not worshiping anyone else.