Archive

Who's the last No. 1 seed?

  • LJ
    WebFire;1591473 wrote:But Dubinski said no!
    Dude, ALL I've ever said on here is what the guy fucking said on the radio. I really don't give 2 shits how they do it.
  • Ironman92
    reclegend22;1591483 wrote:Lunardi says Virginia is a one.

    Kansas a two.

    Duke a three.
    No no....Luni had UVA a 3....win over Duke propels them over 4 worthy teams?
  • reclegend22
    Ironman92;1591497 wrote:No no....Luni had UVA a 3....win over Duke propels them over 4 worthy teams?
    Lol. Well, Luni has changed his mind 10 minutes before the bracket is set to come out. Because he has Virginia as a 1.
  • wildcats20
    Ironman92;1591497 wrote:No no....Luni had UVA a 3....win over Duke propels them over 4 worthy teams?
    He changed it about half way through the UM/Sparty game.
  • WebFire
    LJ;1591495 wrote:Dude, ALL I've ever said on here is what the guy fucking said on the radio. I really don't give 2 shits how they do it.
    Actually, you insisted it was that way because he said that. Anytime someone said otherwise.
  • LJ
    WebFire;1591547 wrote:Actually, you insisted it was that way because he said that. Anytime someone said otherwise.
    No, I merely repeated the only actual statement, from the committee chair, that was out about this year's selection. I didn't insist anything. You're a joke sometimes you know.
  • Laley23
    LOL. LV is a 4 seed. I cant believe CBF actually got us to debate them. They were never even CLOSE to a 1 seed, like we all thought. What a waste of time that was lol
  • WebFire
    LJ;1591556 wrote:No, I merely repeated the only actual statement, from the committee chair, that was out about this year's selection. I didn't insist anything. You're a joke sometimes you know.
    Yes, I know you repeated it, several times, when someone questioned it. Now it is proven false and you can't be wrong about anything, so you call me a joke. Good one man.
  • LJ
    WebFire;1591585 wrote:Yes, I know you repeated it, several times, when someone questioned it. Now it is proven false and you can't be wrong about anything, so you call me a joke. Good one man.
    I said I don't really care how they pick. I think what you should be saying is that maybe the committee chair was lying to the media in his multiple interviews about it the past few weeks. It was never proven false that he said that in multiple interviews. You're a joke.
  • WebFire
    LJ;1591602 wrote:I said I don't really care how they pick. I think what you should be saying is that maybe the committee chair was lying to the media in his multiple interviews about it the past few weeks. It was never proven false that he said that in multiple interviews. You're a joke.
    I didn't mean that him saying it was false. I'm saying he DID lie, obviously. It was your insistence that it was truth that was annoying. Now that we know it doesn't work that way, you are still trying to make someone else wrong. Maybe I'm a joke sometimes, but you are fucking annoying alot.
  • WebFire
    LJ;1591602 wrote:I said I don't really care how they pick.
    You said that AFTER it was established it didn't work the way you insisted it did.
  • LJ
    WebFire;1591613 wrote:I didn't mean that him saying it was false. I'm saying he DID lie, obviously. It was your insistence that it was truth that was annoying. Now that we know it doesn't work that way, you are still trying to make someone else wrong. Maybe I'm a joke sometimes, but you are fucking annoying alot.
    My only "insistence" was that the chair was giving said information. HE was very insistent about it. I was merely relaying his statements. Again, I DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT HOW THEY PICK THE BRACKETS. I'm not trying to make anyone else wrong, it's just funny that you keep jumping on this like it was my opinion or something.
  • WebFire
    LJ;1591621 wrote:My only "insistence" was that the chair was giving said information. HE was very insistent about it. I was merely relaying his statements. Again, I DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT HOW THEY PICK THE BRACKETS. I'm not trying to make anyone else wrong, it's just funny that you keep jumping on this like it was my opinion or something.
    LJ;1587502 wrote:Committee has said multiple times that the B1G championship game plays no role in the selection unless a team that wasn't in, wins to auto qualify.
    wildcats20;1587507 wrote:And you believe that?
    LJ;1587508 wrote:I do believe that seeding is done before the B1G game and that the game doesn't affect it. Makin the game, yes. The winner, no.
    Even when LJ is wrong, he isn't wrong.
  • WebFire
    I'm only jumping on it because of your always right tone on the board. I'll drop it.
  • LJ
    WebFire;1591629 wrote:Even when LJ is wrong, he isn't wrong.
    What reason did I have to not believe him?

    It's like your boss telling you that you are gonna get a raise and your coworkers saying "that's not how it works" who do you believe?

    Fact is, all I know about the selections is what the guy who runs the thing said in interviews. So sure, what I believed was wrong, because the guy who controls it gave false information. Problem is, you keep jumping on me like I either made this up, or it my opinion alone. THAT is what I am giving you shit about. I don't care that it was wrong or how the seeding worked.
  • Laley23
    LJ;1591207 wrote:It wasn't a notion. The Committee chair Dubinski said it himself in a radio interview.
    This should bring the lulz, Ron Wellman was the chairman this year...not Dubinski, or whatever.
  • LJ
    Laley23;1591761 wrote:This should bring the lulz, Ron Wellman was the chairman this year...not Dubinski, or whatever.
    It was Bobinski that I heard the full interview with. I heard parts of another interview where the exact same comments were made, and they kept referencing he was the chair. I just assumed it was the same guy I heard the first time. Shows you how much i really cared
  • SportsAndLady
    LJ;1591783 wrote:It was Bobinski that I heard the full interview with. I heard parts of another interview where the exact same comments were made, and they kept referencing he was the chair. I just assumed it was the same guy I heard the first time. Shows you how much i really cared
    Lol..you can't take it that you were wrong
  • LJ
    SportsAndLady;1591791 wrote:Lol..you can't take it that you were wrong
    Derp?
    LJ;1591636 wrote:So sure, what I believed was wrong, because the guy who controls it gave false information.
  • Prescott
    Based on the interview I just listened to, there were 3 teams in consideration for the last #1 seed. Michigan would have gotten it if they had won the B1G tournament. Virginia was next in line if they won , which they obviously did.If UM and Virginia both won UM would have been the choice. Had both UM and Virginia lost Villanova would have fallen into the #1 seed.
  • vball10set
    I'm running a bracket-challenge for family and friends, so could someone please recommend a good online bracket that can be easily filled out and emailed to me. Thanks.
  • reclegend22
    http://www.printyourbrackets.com/fillable-ncaa-tournament-bracket.html

    See if that works.
  • vball10set
    Excellent--thanks!