BCS Bowl Projections

• Automatik

  

  You can't be a top 15 team if you get beat by 37 in YOUR OWN HOUSE.
• Rotinaj

  

  Clemson must be benefitting from SEC bias.
• jmog

  ernest_t_bass;1547643 wrote:Clemson isn't "bad," but you cannot tell me they aren't incredibly overrated.

  Exactly
• ernest_t_bass

  

  Rotinaj;1547679 wrote:Clemson must be benefitting from SEC bias.

  They're benefiting from overhype. They beat Georgia (lulcatz), and everyone thought they were the next best thing since sliced bread.
• Rotinaj

  

  Pretty much every team from #6 on has at least 1 bad loss. I don't see people on here complaining about Stanford whos ranked 7th with losses to USC and Utah.
• Heretic

  

  Rotinaj;1547717 wrote:Pretty much every team from #6 on has at least 1 bad loss. I don't see people on here complaining about Stanford whos ranked 7th with losses to USC and Utah.

  They got their dose a few weeks ago when a studio guy (I think Jessie Palmer) said they should be higher than Ohio State and excused their loss to Utah as them "not playing Stanford football" or some such nonsense. The Internet is a pretty ADD place, though, so after that second loss, people forgot about them.
  
  I do find it funny, though, that a Stanford team with two losses (one to a borderline ranked team and one to a bad team) is a handful of spots ahead of a Michigan State team with one loss (to a borderline ranked team).
  
  BTW -- my definition of "borderline ranked" is a team that's been in the Top 25 some/most of the year, but hasn't been ranked particularly highly. In the "good win and you're ranked, but a loss and you're out" class.
• Rotinaj

  

  Heretic;1547726 wrote:They got their dose a few weeks ago when a studio guy (I think Jessie Palmer) said they should be higher than Ohio State and excused their loss to Utah as them "not playing Stanford football" or some such nonsense. The Internet is a pretty ADD place, though, so after that second loss, people forgot about them.
  
  I do find it funny, though, that a Stanford team with two losses (one to a borderline ranked team and one to a bad team) is a handful of spots ahead of a Michigan State team with one loss (to a borderline ranked team).
  
  BTW -- my definition of "borderline ranked" is a team that's been in the Top 25 some/most of the year, but hasn't been ranked particularly highly. In the "good win and you're ranked, but a loss and you're out" class.

  MSU should definitely be ranked ahead of the 2 loss teams.
• Tiernan

  The media refuses to amend their early season slamming of the B1G and give it the improvement recognition it obviously earned as other conferences slipped during the year. The overwhelming hate for OSU across the country has collateral negative impact against the rest of the conference too. If the Bucks can defeat a very tough Sparty on Sat, the rest of the nation is going to see what the B1G is really all about against an FSU team that really hasn't done anything.
• jmog

  Tiernan;1548124 wrote:The media refuses to amend their early season slamming of the B1G and give it the improvement recognition it obviously earned as other conferences slipped during the year. The overwhelming hate for OSU across the country has collateral negative impact against the rest of the conference too. If the Bucks can defeat a very tough Sparty on Sat, the rest of the nation is going to see what the B1G is really all about against an FSU team that really hasn't done anything.

  Like it or not you are incorrect.
  
  The part you are incorrect about is that ESPiN and the "nation" as a whole, if OSU beats MSU, it will only be because MSU is not that good. It will have nothing to do with OSU being good.
  
  If OSU beats FSU for the title, it will not be because OSU is good, it will be because the ACC was terrible therefore FSU wasn't that good, and "Auburn would have beat OSU by 30".
  
  That will be the narrative, you watch.
  
  After two bad NCG's in a row (even though one was by 'only' 2 scores) against the SEC, it will take OSU beating an SEC team in a NCG before the perception is changed.
  
  Even with OSU beating an SEC team (Arkansas) a couple years ago in the Sugar, even with the Florida game 2 years ago being a 1 score game in a home bowl game for the Gators, it doesn't matter. OSU could go 5-0 against SEC teams in regular season and bowl games for the next few years, until they beat one in the NCG, ESPiN and the media will not recognize it as "counting".
• ernest_t_bass

  

  I laugh at the whole, "OSU lost 2 straight NCG's!!!" They made it to two straight NCG's! I mean, Notre Dame sucked last year, but they won all their games, and they made it to the NCG. Regardless of whether or not they got creamed by Bama, runner up will always be better than 3rd place... only not in the fucked up system we have.
  
  Look at the Bills of the 90's. They lost 4 straight super bowls, and that is the only thing people will recognize them for... for being losers. But they made FOUR STRAIGHT FUCKING SUPER BOWLS. That's unheard of, regardless of whether or not they made it over the hump to win.
• lhslep134

  

  2 things:
  
  1) if we beat MSU solidly and then take care of business in the national championship solidly, I don't think national perception will be a problem anymore IMO.
  
  2) How hilarious is it (and why isn't anyone mentioning this more) that two middle-high tier Big 12 programs are running train in the mighty SEC (TAMU last year, Mizzou this year)?
  
  I mean if the SEC is soooo good, you'd think Mizzou and TAMU would be doing worse. Again, it's more proof the SEC isn't all it's cracked up to be.
• ernest_t_bass

  

  lhslep134;1548155 wrote: 2) How hilarious is it (and why isn't anyone mentioning this more) that two middle-high tier Big 12 programs are running train in the mighty SEC (TAMU last year, Mizzou this year)?

  It's been mentioned quite a bit, I believe.
• jmog

  lhslep134;1548155 wrote: 2) How hilarious is it (and why isn't anyone mentioning this more) that two middle-high tier Big 12 programs are running train in the mighty SEC (TAMU last year, Mizzou this year)?
  
  I mean if the SEC is soooo good, you'd think Mizzou and TAMU would be doing worse. Again, it's more proof the SEC isn't all it's cracked up to be.

  
  Read higher, this has already been discussed .
  
  But you know, simply by osmosis as soon as they joined the SEC, they got THAT much better!
• ernest_t_bass

  

  If OSU (or any B1G) joined the SEC and dropped trowel on everyone, would the "SEC be down," or "they were saved from the B1G!"
• wildcats20

  

  ernest_t_bass;1548166 wrote:If OSU (or any B1G) joined the SEC and dropped trowel on everyone, would the "SEC be down," or "they were saved from the B1G!"

  SEC would be down.
• lhslep134

  

  jmog;1548160 wrote:Read higher, this has already been discussed .
  
  But you know, simply by osmosis as soon as they joined the SEC, they got THAT much better!

  
  Sorry guys! Guess I got lazy in reading every post above this. Shame on me
• lhslep134

  

  ernest_t_bass;1548157 wrote:It's been mentioned quite a bit, I believe.

  I mean by national media. I know we've talked about it on here, but I brought it up again because a couple of my classmates are Big 12 alumni and we all laughed about it yesterday.
• Tiernan

  jmog;1548135 wrote:Like it or not you are incorrect.

  uhhh...I think we are saying the same thing Sparky...even with a win over FSU, OSU will hear the BS about how that just proves two 1 loss SEC teams shouldve been in the NCG in the first place. But who gives a shit? ...the crystal ball will be sitting in the Woody Hayes Center bitches!
• Tiernan

  ^^^
  BTW...this is the last year for the Crystal Ball Trophy. The CFB Championship Committee wanted a new trophy not connected with any previous formats. It would be pretty cool to have the last one sitting in a case next to the 2003 edition.
• jmog

  Tiernan;1548209 wrote:^^^
  BTW...this is the last year for the Crystal Ball Trophy. The CFB Championship Committee wanted a new trophy not connected with any previous formats. It would be pretty cool to have the last one sitting in a case next to the 2003 edition.

  I agree.
  
  I almost hope FSU loses and OSU wins (unlikely as Duke is not any good) just so that Auburn/Mizzou gets in and OSU beats them. All that just to shove it down the SECs throat .
• queencitybuckeye

  jmog;1548160 wrote:
  But you know, simply by osmosis as soon as they joined the SEC, they got THAT much better!

  Must be nice to wake up one morning and go from average to blazing fast.
• vball10set

  jmog;1548242 wrote:I agree.
  
  I almost hope FSU loses and OSU wins (unlikely as Duke is not any good) just so that Auburn/Mizzou gets in and OSU beats them. All that just to shove it down the SECs throat .

  
  We'll know if this is a realistic possibility at 2:00 today.
• Iliketurtles

  

  vball10set;1548257 wrote:We'll know if this is a realistic possibility at 2:00 today.

  FSU would probably win even without Winston. But they would probably get pushed down in the polls.
• wes_mantooth

  

  I have to say, I get a kick out of listening to Jesse Palmer on bcs stuff. I mean, most guys are just trying to play to good ratings....he is generally retarded imo. He just never makes much sense
• Manhattan Buckeye

  FYI on another fan thread board (University of Virginia) someone claimed that Ohio State embarrassed themselves in 3 championship games, it got 95% approval notwithstanding that 5% of people actually pointed out Ohio State beat Miami.
  
  Here is the thing. SEC and ACC people predominantly hate Ohio State, not just hate them but hate them with irrational views. This is why a playoff is needed. If we were to go back to 2002 Ohio State would never have been in the championship ("they'll get obliterated" - Tim Brando) and that fake championship wouldn't exist.