Archive

The only quarterback worth drafting this year is...

  • Iliketurtles
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536222 wrote:The NFL is as much of a leap from college as college is from HS. Running QB's don't last long and the play is ridiculously fast. I can only think of two college QB's in recent memory that were sure things in the NFL - Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck based on their skill, leadership and work ethic. Everything else is a crapshoot. You might get a Tom Brady or Drew Brees, or you might get a Ryan Leaf or David Klingler.

    Even recent media darlings like Newton, Kaepernick and RGIII have taken their lumps in the NFL.

    I don't see Manziel (or anyone else in this year's QB class) distinguishing themselves.
    Manning was never a "sure thing" many people had questions regarding him. It was probably at 70/30 spilt on him with Ryan Leaf.
  • lhslep134
    Automatik;1536211 wrote:It's obvious, a lot of people discounting Manziel haven't really watched much of him.
    Definitely true. Although I'd say that a lot of sports chatter/opinion is in the same vein (ignorance). Not everyone takes the time to actually watch enough, or understand the subtleties enough, to make a truly educated opinion (I'm just as guilty of doing this too).

    I don't have a problem with it, but from time to time it becomes painfully obvious when that's the case like right now with Manziel's "inaccuracy" or "inability to read defenses".
  • lhslep134
    Iliketurtles;1536225 wrote:Manning was never a "sure thing" many people had questions regarding him. It was probably at 70/30 spilt on him with Ryan Leaf.

    I wish I would have been a few years older to appreciate the whole Manning vs. Leaf pre-draft debate.
  • Automatik
    It does happen at times, but "Mike Evan's always bailing him out" is also laughable.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Iliketurtles;1536225 wrote:Manning was never a "sure thing" many people had questions regarding him. It was probably at 70/30 spilt on him with Ryan Leaf.
    If the 30 were idiots, then yes. It isn't as if sportswriters get everything correct. For many people it was a no-brainer.
  • se-alum
    lhslep134;1536161 wrote:You're preaching the fact that Braxton worked with Whitfield, and how much it's improved his read progression and in the same breath discounting the fact that Manziel worked with Whitfield too and also has improved a great ton in progressing through his reads.

    Thanks for the laugh, I get a kick out of blatant hypocrisy.
    LOL...they've both worked with Whitfield, so obviously they both progressed the same, gotcha. You're claiming that just working with Whitfield makes you equally as good as all other QB's that have worked with Whitfield, in all aspects of playing QB. Well, he's worked with over 20 QB's currently playing college football, and most of them aren't very good. So just saying one is as good as the other at an aspect of playing QB, just because they used the same QB coach is ludicrous.
  • Rotinaj
    Automatik;1536211 wrote:It's obvious, a lot of people discounting Manziel haven't really watched much of him.
    And are just blinded by hate. He's an amazing college QB. Will he be a good pro? Who knows? I think he has a better chance than most.
  • Pick6
    Rotinaj;1536354 wrote:And are just blinded by hate. He's an amazing college QB. Will he be a good pro? Who knows? I think he has a better chance than most.
    the debate is over johnny manziel being a professional quarterback, not how good he is in college.
  • Rotinaj
    Pick6;1536355 wrote:the debate is over johnny manziel being a professional quarterback, not how good he is in college.
    No shit. I said he has a better chance than most. WTF is your point?
  • lhslep134
    se-alum;1536299 wrote:LOL...they've both worked with Whitfield, so obviously they both progressed the same, gotcha. You're claiming that just working with Whitfield makes you equally as good as all other QB's that have worked with Whitfield, in all aspects of playing QB. Well, he's worked with over 20 QB's currently playing college football, and most of them aren't very good. So just saying one is as good as the other at an aspect of playing QB, just because they used the same QB coach is ludicrous.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    He has a better chance than most if he grows 4 inches and adds 20 lbs. of muscle. Until then he is Ty Detmer reincarnated with a shittier attitude.
  • lhslep134
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536379 wrote:He has a better chance than most if he grows 4 inches and adds 20 lbs. of muscle.
    Russell Wilson agrees...

    :rolleyes:
  • se-alum
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536379 wrote:He has a better chance than most if he grows 4 inches and adds 20 lbs. of muscle. Until then he is Ty Detmer reincarnated with a shittier attitude.
    I've never been a big fan of the height argument. I think you can be successful in the NFL if your around 6'. It's been proven.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Russell Wilson isn't a headcase, is far more athletic and even then...we'll see what he does with the Seahawks.
  • se-alum
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536386 wrote:Russell Wilson isn't a headcase, is far more athletic and even then...we'll see what he does with the Seahawks.
    Wilson far more athletic than Manziel?? Seriously?
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    se-alum;1536385 wrote:I've never been a big fan of the height argument. I think you can be successful in the NFL if your around 6'. It's been proven.
    Drew Brees isn't a headcase, is far more dedicated to improving his game and even then...he's had to rely on a system that allows him to utilize his quick release.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    se-alum;1536388 wrote:Wilson far more athletic than Manziel?? Seriously?
    Wilson could be in the MLB right now...are you kidding me? Manziel would be at the SAE house doing keggers while Russell could play for the Dodgers. Do you even follow sports?
  • Terry_Tate
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536391 wrote:Wilson could be in the MLB right now...are you kidding me? Manziel would be at the SAE house doing keggers while Russell could play for the Dodgers. Do you even follow sports?
    Just because he can be in MLB means absolutely nothing to being more athletic. There is no chance Wilson is more athletic than Manziel.

    Just to further the point, Manziel ran for 17 fewer yards last year alone than Wilson did in his entire 4 years.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Do you think Manziel can run a 4.5 40 and have a 34" vertical?
  • se-alum
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536391 wrote:Wilson could be in the MLB right now...are you kidding me? Manziel would be at the SAE house doing keggers while Russell could play for the Dodgers. Do you even follow sports?
    LOL...what? What does that have to do with anything? Because he was a low level minor league baseball player(and not a good one at that), he is more athletic than Johnny Manziel?
  • se-alum
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536395 wrote:Do you think Manziel can run a 4.5 40 and have a 34" vertical?
    Well, he ran a 4.5 in high school w/ a 31" vertical. No reason that those numbers aren't better now after having 3 years of a college football speed and strength program.
  • Terry_Tate
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536395 wrote:Do you think Manziel can run a 4.5 40 and have a 34" vertical?
    se-alum;1536399 wrote:Well, he ran a 4.5 in high school w/ a 31" vertical. No reason that those numbers aren't better now after having 3 years of a college football speed and strength program.
    Beat me to it. The 4.55 40 time I'd be shocked if JM can't match that, and the vertical I would feel pretty good about as well. The dude is very athletic.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    Wait, wait, you would be shocked if he doesn't match that? Wilson did that at the combine with all of the pressure in the world. This isn't high school where you just guess what your stats are. This is the real deal, not guesstimating.

    'No reason that those numbers aren't better now after having 3 years of a college football speed'

    And 3 years of boozing.
  • lhslep134
    OK guys at this point MB is clearly talking out of his ass and we should just ignore him and his strawman arguments.
  • se-alum
    Manhattan Buckeye;1536405 wrote:Wait, wait, you would be shocked if he doesn't match that? Wilson did that at the combine with all of the pressure in the world. This isn't high school where you just guess what your stats are. This is the real deal, not guesstimating.

    'No reason that those numbers aren't better now after having 3 years of a college football speed'

    And 3 years of boozing.
    LOL...Russell Wilson is the best athlete in the NFL. Period.