Wisconsin at OSU, 9/28, 8pm EST.
-
LJ
If they threw it backwards oob yes it would from my understanding. You Dont see that because is is a stupid risk.mhs95_06;1509274 wrote:If it's legal, then it must also be legal for a running back trying to get OB to stop the clock, but the defender has him by the leg in bounds to just throw the ball OB to stop the clock. I can't imagine that would be legal either! -
mhs95_06
Not if there is 8 sec left, you are on the 20 yd line, behind by 2, and no time-outs. I have watched many a game that it wouldn't be a stupid risk and have wondered why no one does it!LJ;1509278 wrote:If they threw it backwards oob yes it would from my understanding. You Dont see that because is is a stupid risk. -
LJmhs95_06;1509280 wrote:Not if there is 8 sec left, you are on the 20 yd line, behind by 2, and no time-outs. I have watched many a game that it wouldn't be a stupid risk and have wondered why no one does it!
Yes it is. It HAS to go backwards, and if you are being held up by someone it would be stupid risky that it would roll oob before someone else got to it -
ptown_trojans_1Oregon 41-0 over Cal......
-
Pick6Whats up with Jordan Hall? Pretty sure he got 0 carries tonight. Dont even remember seeing him in the game.
-
Pick6bryant has a broken ankle.
-
osu45804Apparently Meyer slammed his fist against the table in frustration when talking about Christian Bryant's injury according to @AriWasserman
-
LJ
Damn!Pick6;1509289 wrote:bryant has a broken ankle. -
ptown_trojans_1
Shiiiiiit.Pick6;1509289 wrote:bryant has a broken ankle. -
LJI heard that Meyer was almost in tears talking about Bryant's injury
-
Mohican00
he was upsetLJ;1509295 wrote:I heard that Meyer was almost in tears talking about Bryant's injury -
mhs95_06
Just 5 yds inbounds, throw it, not roll it, and throw it 1-3 yds backwards from a lateral. Low risk and if you don't do it, you lose the game because the clock runs out.LJ;1509281 wrote:Yes it is. It HAS to go backwards, and if you are being held up by someone it would be stupid risky that it would roll oob before someone else got to it -
#1DBagUgly win, but a win.
-
said_aouitahttp://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2013/09/ohio_state_senior_safety_and_c.html
That's pretty harsh.Mohican00;1509257 wrote:Fuck Wisconsin. -
Midstate01Happy with the win. Hated the play calling after we got up 17. But I'm still happy with the win and the way we looked at times. Defense was awesome against the run.
-
se-alumAlways been a Fickell supporter, but would like to see the defense be a lot more aggressive with their blitzing. Thought we took the foot off the throttle offensively after getting the 17 point. LOL if anyone thinks Braxton throws a better deep ball than Smooth Jazz.
On the Wisky side, Borland is an absolute animal, and Abbrederis is a fine player in his 17th year of eligibility. -
Fly4FunI feel like we're getting away from the run too much, even though we have a great stable of running backs.
-
said_aouita
That's pretty harsh.Mohican00;1509257 wrote:Fuck Wisconsin. -
Benny The JetAny updates on Jordan Hall? Doghouse?
-
Midstate01
Pretty sure we ran the ball more then passed it yesterday.Fly4Fun;1509350 wrote:I feel like we're getting away from the run too much, even though we have a great stable of running backs. -
believerhttp://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=332710194
[h=4]Team Stat Comparison[/h]
WIS OSU 1st Downs 20 21 3rd down efficiency 3-12 6-15 4th down efficiency 1-2 1-2 Total Yards 399 390 Passing 295 198 Comp-Att 20-34 17-25 Yards per pass 8.7 7.9 Rushing 104 192 Rushing Attempts 27 43 Yards per rush 3.9 4.5 Penalties 8-54 6-43 Turnovers 1 0 Fumbles lost 0 0 Interceptions thrown 1 0 Possession 29:42 30:18 -
LJ
25 passes 43 rushesFly4Fun;1509350 wrote:I feel like we're getting away from the run too much, even though we have a great stable of running backs.
Uh Wut -
Tigerfan00
I think he probably means we got away from using Hyde/Hall/Smith.LJ;1509532 wrote:25 passes 43 rushes
Uh Wut -
Fly4Fun
This. I wasn't clear, but I figured me talking about not using our very capable stable of running backs would indicate I was talking about the running backs and not our quarterback.Tigerfan00;1509610 wrote:I think he probably means we got away from using Hyde/Hall/Smith.
I know Rod Smith wouldn't see a lot of touches as he's 3rd at best, but I thought we'd see more of Hall.
18 carries between Hyde (17) and Hall (1) isn't what I was expecting. -
se-alumYea, the designed runs by Miller weren't doing much of anything. The staff didn't trust Miller throwing the ball in the 2nd half for some reason. Let up and let Wisky back in the game.