Wisconsin at OSU, 9/28, 8pm EST.
-
1_beastHUGE
-
robj55damn Spence is a beast man
-
1_beastwtf
-
said_aouitaNice fake injury Buckeyes.
-
tk421terrible clock management
-
1_beastBallgam
-
robj55great win !
-
said_aouitagod damnit kick a fg.
lol -
1_beastUrrrrrrrrrrb
-
Tigerfan00Other then Braxton I think the kicker is the other MVP of the game.
-
Mohican00Fuck Wisconsin.
-
LJSHE'S NOT A MAN. GOD BRAXTON SUCKS
-
gerb131Go Bucks. Win and move on.
-
Tigerfan00Get ready for another big one next week.
-
LJNow its the week of the game that I am actually really nervous for. I get that bad feeling
-
ptown_trojans_1On to Northwestern.
Not fantastic, especially on the secondary and really Braxton runs, but it's a win.
Also, as a note, Oregon is winning against Cal 34-0...Not good to OSU. -
ytownfootballNot sure why we go all conservative in the second half, has to know we need to look decent.
-
mhs95_06
5 yds plus replay the onside kick, right?Pick6;1509237 wrote:idk, but it wouldnt really matter. should just be a 5yd penalty or whatever. -
said_aouitaLJ;1509264 wrote:Now its the week of the game that I am actually really nervous for. I get that bad feeling
NW'ern has the 2nd best coach in B10. Not sure if they have 2nd best talent on the field though. -
believer
No it's not. Assuming Ohio State gets by Northwestern next week not much is going to change in the polls unless the voters think Stanford is more impressive.ptown_trojans_1;1509265 wrote:On to Northwestern.
Not fantastic, especially on the secondary and really Braxton runs, but it's a win.
Also, as a note, Oregon is winning against Cal 33-0...Not good to OSU.
Same line-up for 3 weeks running:
1. Alabama
2. Oregon
3. Clemson
4. Ohio State or Stanford
5. Stanford or Ohio State -
mhs95_06
If it's legal, then it must also be legal for a running back trying to get OB to stop the clock, but the defender has him by the leg in bounds to just throw the ball OB to stop the clock. I can't imagine that would be legal either!believer;1509240 wrote:It's legal. -
Pick6
sorry. might make sense if roby had possession.mhs95_06;1509274 wrote:If it's legal, then it must also be legal for a running back trying to get OB to stop the clock, but the defender has him by the leg in bounds to just throw the ball OB to stop the clock. I can't imagine that would be legal either! -
believer
Jim Lachey and Paul Keels were discussing it at the time of the play and they said it was legal.mhs95_06;1509274 wrote:If it's legal, then it must also be legal for a running back trying to get OB to stop the clock, but the defender has him by the leg in bounds to just throw the ball OB to stop the clock. I can't imagine that would be legal either! -
mhs95_06
If the ball had been low to the ground would it be legal to kick it OB?Pick6;1509275 wrote:sorry. might make sense if roby had possession.