9/22: #11 Notre Dame (3-0) vs #18 Michigan (2-1) [7:30 NBC]

• WebFire

  GoChiefs;1277994 wrote:That's what you took from there posts? :huh: Smh.

  Without being called a whiny bitch and sour grapes, yes. I said no excuses and 6 TOs will not win you games. But apparently you can't look any further than the score to discuss here.
• killer_ewok

  

  WebFire;1277998 wrote:So michigan's in for a rough season and ND is a BCS contender. I think I'll go to the Rivals main board. I can get more logical discussion there.

  
  I said Michigan "may" be in for a rough season after mentioning how turnovers appear to be a potential issue for them. I also agreed with you that it is premature for BCS discussion but that it's not that far-fetched to mention ND as a possible contender. Not sure why you're trying to make it out like I'm touting ND as some great team while saying Michigan is gonna stink this year. But if you prefer to exaggerate and be dramatic...go for it.
• sleeper

  

  killer_ewok;1277908 wrote:The difference is Notre Dame beat Michigan tonight and is 4-0 while they're 2-2. Just the facts.

  Good for Notre Dame. I'm rooting for them to go undefeated this year just so I can watch them get blown out in a BCS bowl game against Alabama. Early spread is Alabama +71.
• killer_ewok

  

  WebFire;1278002 wrote:Without being called a whiny bitch and sour grapes, yes. I said no excuses and 6 TOs will not win you games. But apparently you can't look any further than the score to discuss here.

  
  You played the "IF" game, brought up MSU being overrated, you'd be worried if you were an ND fan, Kelly is a fucktard, Rees will be the starter from now on, etc. Again, comes across as sour grapes to me when you're saying that stuff during and right after the game.
• Crimson streak

  

  WebFire;1277998 wrote:So michigan's in for a rough season and ND is a BCS contender. I think I'll go to the Rivals main board. I can get more logical discussion there.

  
  Lol at the rivals board. Well no shit you can have a discussion, their all sour grapes Michigan fans. The fact is ND made denard throw the ball to beat them and he didn't make the plays. It is as simple as that. Te'o was literally all over the field. The offense was horrible and I dk why cierre wood was not getting carries? Either way mike golic sucks and I can't wait till Nichols is back. As much as I hate tommy Rees. He played a pretty good game. I also don't like how Brian Kelly was putting golson in the situations he did. He should have started him out with some short routes swing passes to get him in rhythm before take a shot deeper.
• killer_ewok

  

  sleeper;1278013 wrote:Good for Notre Dame. I'm rooting for them to go undefeated this year just so I can watch them get blown out in a BCS bowl game against Alabama. Early spread is Alabama +71.

  
  I wouldn't like ND's chances against 'Bama at all. Not sure I like too many team's chances vs. them though to be honest.
• killer_ewok

  

  Crimson streak;1278016 wrote:Lol at the rivals board. Well no shit you can have a discussion, their all sour grapes Michigan fans. The fact is ND made denard throw the ball to beat them and he didn't make the plays. It is as simple as that. Te'o was literally all over the field. The offense was horrible and I dk why cierre wood was not getting carries? Either way mike golic sucks and I can't wait till Nichols is back. As much as I hate tommy Rees. He played a pretty good game. I also don't like how Brian Kelly was putting golson in the situations he did. He should have started him out with some short routes swing passes to get him in rhythm before take a shot deeper.

  
  Agreed. I think we're in for the 2-QB system for the remainder of the year. I'm not a fan but I hope it works out.
• Crimson streak

  

  sleeper;1278013 wrote:Good for Notre Dame. I'm rooting for them to go undefeated this year just so I can watch them get blown out in a BCS bowl game against Alabama. Early spread is Alabama +71.

  
  There's really only about 2-3 that can match up with bama and notre dame is one of them with their front 7. But it really wouldn't matter because bama would still whoop our ass by about 30-40
• sleeper

  

  Rotinaj;1277950 wrote:It says coined "A" game of the century. Not THE game of the century.

  There's no difference.
• WebFire

  Crimson streak;1278016 wrote:Lol at the rivals board. Well no shit you can have a discussion, their all sour grapes Michigan fans. The fact is ND made denard throw the ball to beat them and he didn't make the plays. It is as simple as that. Te'o was literally all over the field. The offense was horrible and I dk why cierre wood was not getting carries? Either way mike golic sucks and I can't wait till Nichols is back. As much as I hate tommy Rees. He played a pretty good game. I also don't like how Brian Kelly was putting golson in the situations he did. He should have started him out with some short routes swing passes to get him in rhythm before take a shot deeper.

  Main rivals board is all Michigan fans? What fucking planet do you live on?
• Crimson streak

  

  killer_ewok;1278020 wrote:Agreed. I think we're in for the 2-QB system for the remainder of the year. I'm not a fan but I hope it works out.

  
  Golson is a guy who can take your team to another level and tommy is a guy that you know what he can do and what it gets us.
• WebFire

  Crimson streak;1278022 wrote:There's really only about 2-3 that can match up with bama and notre dame is one of them with their front 7. But it really wouldn't matter because bama would still whoop our ass by about 30-40

  Good thing you added the last part. Because I laughed hard at the rest.
• WebFire

  killer_ewok;1278020 wrote:Agreed. I think we're in for the 2-QB system for the remainder of the year. I'm not a fan but I hope it works out.

  But when I think it it's sour grapes. :thumbup:
• WebFire

  killer_ewok;1278014 wrote:You played the "IF" game, brought up MSU being overrated, you'd be worried if you were an ND fan, Kelly is a fucktard, Rees will be the starter from now on, etc. Again, comes across as sour grapes to me when you're saying that stuff during and right after the game.

  So again, no opinions or discussion allowed.
• sleeper

  

  Crimson streak;1277995 wrote:You can discuss the game just don't be a little bitch about it. You lost stop sounding like a sore loser and making excuses

  He doesn't sound like sour grapes. ND is getting all high and mighty that they won a game by 7 points at home against a team that gifted 6 turnovers to them(literally). I mean you act like Notre Dame made a play on the ball to get those turnovers when in reality DENARD THREW THE BALL RIGHT TO THEM.
  
  Denard should be investigated for points manipulation. What was the spread on the game?
• Crimson streak

  

  WebFire;1278029 wrote:But when I think it it's sour grapes. :thumbup:

  
  Well when you make comments like Kelly's a fucktard yeah it does sound like sour grapes considering he made the switch and it worked out for him
• WebFire

  killer_ewok;1278014 wrote:You played the "IF" game, brought up MSU being overrated, you'd be worried if you were an ND fan, Kelly is a fucktard, Rees will be the starter from now on, etc. Again, comes across as sour grapes to me when you're saying that stuff during and right after the game.

  Is the "if" game that I said Michigan wins "if" Michigan doesn't turn it over 6 times? Do you disagree?
• sleeper

  

  Hell Michigan would have lost to a Sun Belt bottom feeder last night with they way they played. I mean Christ, you are 4-0 act like you've been there before. :thumbdown:
• WebFire

  Crimson streak;1278033 wrote:Well when you make comments like Kelly's a fucktard yeah it does sound like sour grapes considering he made the switch and it worked out for him

  I thought he was a fucktard before the game.
• sleeper

  

  Crimson streak;1278022 wrote:There's really only about 2-3 that can match up with bama and notre dame is one of them with their front 7. But it really wouldn't matter because bama would still whoop our ass by about 30-40

  I lol'd. Sorry but no.
• killer_ewok

  

  WebFire;1278031 wrote:So again, no opinions or discussion allowed.

  
  No, it's allowed. Just be prepared to be called out for your sour grapes. It goes both ways.
• Crimson streak

  

  sleeper;1278038 wrote:I lol'd. Sorry but no.

  
  It was more of a joke. Bama is on another level and there o line is ridiculous
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Crimson streak;1278022 wrote:There's really only about 2-3 that can match up with bama and notre dame is one of them with their front 7

  LOL
• Crimson streak

  

  DeyDurkie5;1278044 wrote:LOL

  
  I love you none of you read or quote the other part to that comment.
• sleeper

  

  Crimson streak;1278043 wrote:It was more of a joke. Bama is on another level and there o line is ridiculous

  Agreed. Their whole team is ridiculous. It's easy to recruit players when you don't have any academic standards, you don't self-report any violations, you over-sign and you can pay your players whenever you want.