John Simon

• DeyDurkie5

  

  Scarlet_Buckeye;937862 wrote:Yep. I will when Simon is drafted much later after the 10th pick.

  I didn't say he was. I was asking what people thought of the idea, you fuckin dumbass
• j_crazy

  

  DeyDurkie5;937872 wrote:I didn't say he was. I was asking what people thought of the idea, you fuckin dumbass

  
  Wasting energy.
• GoPens

  

  The_Crosby_Show;935348 wrote:Yes, the dude is a beast.
  
  

  Kind of reminds me of pictures I've seen of Bane in the new Dark Knight movie.
• thedynasty1998

  

  ksig489;935551 wrote:A few thoughts:
  
  1. He should go pro after this year
  2. Is he big enough to play DT in the NFL?
  3. Even if he isn't big enough, he will be successful in the NFL
  4. He is by far the best DL in the NCAA this year, unblockable when he chooses to be

  He could very well, because I don't think he improves stock by returning. I think he's basically reached his potential and doesn't have much to gain by returning.
  
  I worry about his size. Plus I question his athleticism. He actually reminds me a lot of Gholsten. He's successful at the college level because he's just stronger than everyone else. Not sure if that's the case in the NFL.
  
  He will play in the NFL for a long time.
  
  He is not the best in the country. Have you watched the DT in the SEC? I feel like that's the biggest difference from the SEC and everyone else, they have monsters at DT.
• Terry_Tate

  

  thedynasty1998;938213 wrote:I worry about his size. Plus I question his athleticism. He actually reminds me a lot of Gholsten. He's successful at the college level because he's just stronger than everyone else. Not sure if that's the case in the NFL.

  
  I think with Gholston his problems were more mental in that I don't think his heart was ever truly into being a star NFL player. I heard him speak a few times and he always seemed to be very quiet and relaxed, and just not aggressive enough for the NFL. Just don't think his personality allowed him to play in the NFL if that makes any sense.
• Scarlet_Buckeye

  

  DeyDurkie5;937872 wrote:I didn't say he was. I was asking what people thought of the idea

  The idea of John Simon being a top 5 pick is dumb, dumbass.
• 0311sdp

  Simon is too small to play DT in the NFL but could play DE or maybe even convert to LB but you have to question his speed for that move. He won't be a top 10 pick probably not even a first round pick if he comes out this year. Probably a second rounder because of his lack of size (height as well as weight) a great player at the college level.
• LJ

  

  Terry_Tate;938312 wrote:I think with Gholston his problems were more mental in that I don't think his heart was ever truly into being a star NFL player. I heard him speak a few times and he always seemed to be very quiet and relaxed, and just not aggressive enough for the NFL. Just don't think his personality allowed him to play in the NFL if that makes any sense.

  I think the failed switch to LB really killed any chances he had. The fact that he came into the league and failed so quickly seems like it made him just go "eh fuck it"
• LJ

  

  0311sdp;938328 wrote:Simon is too small to play DT in the NFL but could play DE or maybe even convert to LB but you have to question his speed for that move. He won't be a top 10 pick probably not even a first round pick if he comes out this year. Probably a second rounder because of his lack of size (height as well as weight) a great player at the college level.

  He is 6'2 270, like I said earlier, he will play 3 technique in the NFL. Add 10 lbs and he is good to go.
• se-alum

  

  thedynasty1998;938213 wrote:He could very well, because I don't think he improves stock by returning. I think he's basically reached his potential and doesn't have much to gain by returning.
  
  I worry about his size. Plus I question his athleticism. He actually reminds me a lot of Gholsten. He's successful at the college level because he's just stronger than everyone else. Not sure if that's the case in the NFL.
  
  He will play in the NFL for a long time.
  
  He is not the best in the country. Have you watched the DT in the SEC? I feel like that's the biggest difference from the SEC and everyone else, they have monsters at DT.

  I think Simon is better all around player than Gholsten was. Simon is as good against the run, as he is against the pass. Simon made a play in the flat against Illinois, that you don't really expect out of a DE. He dropped and covered the TE coming across the field, the got out to the flat on the pass and stopped the play for minimal game. Very impressive from a DE.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Scarlet_Buckeye;938322 wrote:The idea of John Simon being a top 5 pick is dumb, dumbass.

  in your opinion of course.
  
  don't hold me accountable though, don't want to get called out by the all knowing scarlet!
• Commander of Awesome

  

  What's the basis for everyone thinking that he'll come back for his senior yr?
• Scarlet_Buckeye

  

  0311sdp;938328 wrote:Simon is too small to play DT in the NFL but could play DE or maybe even convert to LB but you have to question his speed for that move. He won't be a top 10 pick probably not even a first round pick if he comes out this year. Probably a second rounder because of his lack of size (height as well as weight) a great player at the college level.

  This.
• Scarlet_Buckeye

  

  Commander of Awesome;938486 wrote:What's the basis for everyone thinking that he'll come back for his senior yr?

  Because he's too small to play defensive tackle at the next step.
• LJ

  

  Scarlet_Buckeye;938495 wrote:Because he's too small to play defensive tackle at the next step.

  Why do you think he will be drafted as a DT? He has been playing a lot of end this year.
• Automatik

  

  Scarlet_Buckeye;938495 wrote:Because he's too small to play defensive tackle at the next step.

  So by staying he would get bigger? lol
  
  I think he should go, I sure as hell would. I don't think his stock will get any higher by staying.
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Scarlet_Buckeye;938495 wrote:Because he's too small to play defensive tackle at the next step.

  in your opinion. If he does play defensive tackle, willl you start a thread holding yourself accountable?
• LJ

  

  Once again, why does everyone keep talking about him as a DT when he is clearly a 3 technique kinda player?
  
  think Cam Heyward. Simon is just a bit smaller and just a bit stronger than Heyward. He plays inside and outside on the line just like Heyward did. He fits the 3 technique perfectly....
  
  Or does no one understand what I am talking about? 3 technique is a 3-4 DE
• Commander of Awesome

  

  Scarlet_Buckeye;938495 wrote:Because he's too small to play defensive tackle at the next step.

  Ok so its your opinion and not something he has said or inside knowledge.
• ksig489

  LJ;938512 wrote:Once again, why does everyone keep talking about him as a DT when he is clearly a 3 technique kinda player?
  
  think Cam Heyward. Simon is just a bit smaller and just a bit stronger than Heyward. He plays inside and outside on the line just like Heyward did. He fits the 3 technique perfectly....
  
  Or does no one understand what I am talking about? 3 technique is a 3-4 DE

  
  3 tech is typically lined up on an offensive guards outside shoulder. In a 4-3 your DTs play a 3 and a 1 (or 0 depending on your team). In a 3-4 the Nose is in a 0 or 1 on the C and the DEs play 4 or 5 on a OT.
  
  Your terminology is off...but it may be what you know as all teams use differing terminology. I have never heard of a professional team reference a 3-4 DE as a 3 tech.
  
  Most commonly the numbering goes like this:
  
  0 = head up on C
  1 = shoulder of C
  2 = head up on G
  3 = outside shoulder of G
  4 = head up on T
  5 = outside shoulder of T
  
  Numbering for inside shoulder and alignment on TE vary greatly by team.
  
  Bear Bryant is one of the biggest known coaches credited for numbering the D-Line and he used the above system along with:
  
  2i = inside shoulder of G
  4i = inside shoulder of T
  6 = head up on TE
  7 = inside shoulder of TE
  9 = shoulder of TE
  
  No one can really explain the TE numbering that I have ever heard.
• karen lotz

  

  I seriously doubt LJ is wrong about anything. Just ask him, he'll tell you.
• dat dude

  The Buckeye D-Lineman with the greatest likelihood of being a first rounder is Big Hank, imo.
• LJ

  

  karen lotz;938692 wrote:I seriously doubt LJ is wrong about anything. Just ask him, he'll tell you.

  It's because in HS we played a 3-4 with a stand up LB who played the 4 and 5 and a DE who played the 3, which the Steelers (the only 3-4 team I pay attention to) will do as well.
  
  It's honestly about different lineups, not being right or wrong
• hilliardfan

  ksig489;935551 wrote:A few thoughts:
  4. He is by far the best DL in the NCAA this year, unblockable when he chooses to be

  Out of curiosity, if this were the case why would he ever choose to be blocked?
• Scarlet_Buckeye

  

  LJ;938501 wrote:Why do you think he will be drafted as a DT? He has been playing a lot of end this year.

  He's too slow for DE.
  
  I think Simon is a HELLUVA college ball player, but his size and speed just do not translate over very well to the next level. He's too small to be a NFL DT and he's too slow to be a NFL DE.