Archive

Ohio State at #15 Illinois

  • WebFire
    I wonder how hurt he really was. To watch his team lose like that from the sidelines, he should have been pretty damn hurt.
  • Automatik
    WebFire;928898 wrote:I wonder how hurt he really was. To watch his team lose like that from the sidelines, he should have been pretty damn hurt.
    Hurt enough for the team doctors to hold him out.
  • WebFire
    Automatik;928899 wrote:Hurt enough for the team doctors to hold him out.
    Maybe. But I've seen players play with a lot worse injuries. Like broken legs and having to be carried down the field. Maybe he has low pain tolerance?
  • Automatik
    WebFire;928914 wrote:Maybe. But I've seen players play with a lot worse injuries. Like broken legs and having to be carried down the field. Maybe he has low pain tolerance?
    Or maybe his ankle was sprained and he couldn't run on it. I'm going with that.
  • Ty Webb
    Automatik;928929 wrote:Or maybe his ankle was sprained and he couldn't run on it. I'm going with that.
    I don't want to hear this fucking shit. He should have been more like Byron Leftwich,who had a broken fucking leg and had to be carried from huddle to huddle but stayed in the game. That's the kinda guy I want on my team

    As for the game...Fighting Zooks by 10
  • Automatik
    Ty Webb;928946 wrote:I don't want to hear this fucking shit. He should have been more like Byron Leftwich,who had a broken fucking leg and had to be carried from huddle to huddle but stayed in the game. That's the kinda guy I want on my team

    As for the game...Fighting Zooks by 10
    No one cares what you want to hear.

    Also that was one instance with a drop back passer playing in the MAC.
  • vball10set
    Ty Webb;928946 wrote:I don't want to hear this ****ing ****. He should have been more like Byron Leftwich,who had a broken ****ing leg and had to be carried from huddle to huddle but stayed in the game. That's the kinda guy I want on my team

    As for the game...Fighting Zooks by 10
    good lord, I was hoping you went into hibernation for the winter...no such luck :(
  • FatHobbit
    WebFire;928914 wrote:Maybe. But I've seen players play with a lot worse injuries. Like broken legs and having to be carried down the field. Maybe he has low pain tolerance?
    Do you mean like Denard last year in the OSU/UM game? :)
  • Writerbuckeye
    WebFire;928914 wrote:Maybe. But I've seen players play with a lot worse injuries. Like broken legs and having to be carried down the field. Maybe he has low pain tolerance?
    There's no "maybe" here. The doctors held him out. Neither the player or coaches can do squat if the doctors say he can't play -- and that's what happened.
  • vball10set
    Writerbuckeye;928993 wrote:There's no "maybe" here. The doctors held him out. Neither the player or coaches can do squat if the doctors say he can't play -- and that's what happened.
    Writer, I gotta' ask--were you on the sideline for this game? I agree that what the doctor says is golden, but where did you see this? Please post a link--thanks.
  • WebFire
    Writerbuckeye;928993 wrote:There's no "maybe" here. The doctors held him out. Neither the player or coaches can do squat if the doctors say he can't play -- and that's what happened.
    My point being he could have let on that it was worse than it really was. Which, if he is starting this week and everything is fine, must be the case.
  • Automatik
    WebFire;929044 wrote:My point being he could have let on that it was worse than it really was. Which, if he is starting this week and everything is fine, must be the case.
    Have you ever tweaked your ankle and then tried to walk or run on it right after. How about play quarterback?

    I'm guessing you haven't.
  • WebFire
    Automatik;929053 wrote:Have you ever tweaked your ankle and then tried to walk or run on it right after. How about play quarterback?

    I'm guessing you haven't.
    Both. Thanks.

    Difference between pain and injured. I just know we've seen QBs go back into a game with way worse injuries. Maybe he was hurt. But then 2 days later he's fine and starting the next game. Must not have been hurt too bad. Can't argue that, can you?
  • Automatik
    WebFire;929057 wrote:Both. Thanks.

    Difference between pain and injured. I just know we've seen QBs go back into a game with way worse injuries. Maybe he was hurt. But then 2 days later he's fine and starting the next game. Must not have been hurt too bad. Can't argue that, can you?
    Oh really. How did that turn out...especially the QB part?

    If he couldn't run he was pretty much useless at that point in the game.
  • WebFire
    Automatik;929060 wrote:Oh really. How did that turn out...especially the QB part?

    If he couldn't run he was pretty much useless at that point in the game.
    If you must know this irrelevant piece of info, I played RB until my Jr year and switched to WR. 4th game of Jr year, our starting QB gets mad and "quits", but of course comes back. Coach suspends him for 1 game. Our JV had a broken ankle, so the only other QB was a 110 lb freshman. I had never taken a snap in my life, but I started that Friday. 7/12, 120 yards and 1 TD/1 INT passing, plus some rushing yards since we ran a lot of option and keepers. I played about half the next game, and then here and there the rest of the year just for change of pace, mostly option.

    Now, what did this have to do with Miller?
  • Automatik
    You misunderstood my post. I meant play QB after tweaking an ankle. I wasn't asking about your h/s football fill opportunity. :laugh:

    Bottom line is, I feel if he could have went back in, he would have. If you disagree that is fine, everyone has their opinions. Maybe the staff held him back for fear of a serious injury? No one knows for sure.

    Also, I never read anything saying he was "fine" just that he is still the #1...a lot can happen in a week.
  • WebFire
    Automatik;929080 wrote:You misunderstood my post. I meant play QB after tweaking an ankle.
    Oh. No. But tweaking an ankle wasn't fun as a WR or RB either. I also played CB. No fun with a tweaked ankle.

    He may have been that hurt. We'll never know. But Automatik will have a hard time convincing me that a "tweaked" ankle should keep the team leader off the field, when he is desperately needed. Especially when he was seen walking/jogging on it. And even more so when 2 days later he is fine and named the starter for the next game. So he obviously didn't have an injury that was very newsworthy. Injured ankles don't just heal up in 2 days. But you already know that.
  • Automatik
    Again....where did you hear that he was "fine"? I also don't think and 18 year old true frosh is our team leader, although I couldn't tell you who it is actually. Leadership is definitely something that is lacking on this squad, from the coaches to the players.
  • WebFire
    Automatik;929089 wrote:Again....where did you hear that he was "fine"?
    He's starting this week.
    Automatik;929089 wrote: I also don't think and 18 year old true frosh is our team leader, although I couldn't tell you who it is actually. Leadership is definitely something that is lacking on this squad, from the coaches to the players.
    He could be and needs to be. I always look at the QB as the offensive leader. But maybe my point was your last sentence.
  • WebFire
    I say we keep the Braxton ankle talk here. We've hijacked this thread.

    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?29295-Braxton-Miller-update&highlight=braxton+miller
  • BigAppleBuckeye
    I am not sure why, but I think OSU actually wins this game (as long as Miller plays). Logic is not on my side, but in reality, the offense -- with Miller -- did improve vastly, and the defense was lights out for 2-1/2 quarters (and dismal for 1-1/2). Lots of lessons to be learned, and hopefully were learned. Call me crazy, but I like OSU 27-17.
  • FatHobbit
    BigAppleBuckeye;929118 wrote:I am not sure why, but I think OSU actually wins this game (as long as Miller plays). Logic is not on my side, but in reality, the offense -- with Miller -- did improve vastly, and the defense was lights out for 2-1/2 quarters (and dismal for 1-1/2). Lots of lessons to be learned, and hopefully were learned. Call me crazy, but I like OSU 27-17.
    You're crazy! But I hope you're right.
  • Automatik
    I haven't seen Illinois play this year so I don't really have a prediction. It's hard to come up with one with this team. I thought we would get destroyed by Nebraska.
  • jhay78
    Writerbuckeye;928894 wrote:OSU has released the roster for this game: Miller is the starter, and Bauserman is the backup. Do you really believe Bauserman won't play, given Miller's ankle?

    This staff is so inept, I want them fired as soon as the whistle blows ending the UM game.
    I don't mind if Bauserman plays- if it's garbage time and he's turning and handing off to a RB (which is all he should've done Sat night).

    If Bauserman sets foot on the field against Illinois, and either Miller/Guiton/Graham can walk, the staff should be fired on the spot.
    WebFire;928898 wrote:I wonder how hurt he really was. To watch his team lose like that from the sidelines, he should have been pretty damn hurt.
    WebFire;929102 wrote:I say we keep the Braxton ankle talk here. I've hijacked this thread.

    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?29295-Braxton-Miller-update&highlight=braxton+miller
    Fixed that last one for you.
  • LJ
    Illinois most definitely has the athletes that can run with OSU. If Petrino and Koenning call a decent game, OSU could be in trouble. Let's not forget the fact that Illinois always plays OSU tough.