Archive

NCAA having a 2nd investigation on OSU?

  • se-alum
    From Dan Wetzel:
    Unless Tressel unexpectedly drops a bombshell, hearing OSU in fine shape today w/ NCAA; additional sanctions unlikely.
  • Writerbuckeye
    I think It's more likely Ellis is getting money from SI to talk than any hush money. Remember, he wasn't going to talk at all because of fear his identity would come out. Now all of a sudden he's become fearless and has no problem meeting with the NCAA? That reeks of "incentives" coming from SI. They are the ones who have pushed for more harsh punishment, and definitely have a stake in extending the investigation in hopes something else comes up.
  • WebFire
    Writerbuckeye;859819 wrote:I think It's more likely Ellis is getting money from SI to talk than any hush money. Remember, he wasn't going to talk at all because of fear his identity would come out. Now all of a sudden he's become fearless and has no problem meeting with the NCAA? That reeks of "incentives" coming from SI. They are the ones who have pushed for more harsh punishment, and definitely have a stake in extending the investigation in hopes something else comes up.

    That's a good point. But I wouldn't be surprised if he suddenly changes his mind next week if SI gets outbid. ;)
  • Writerbuckeye
    WebFire;859916 wrote:That's a good point. But I wouldn't be surprised if he suddenly changes his mind next week if SI gets outbid. ;)

    Unlikely. Our boosters only hand out about $500 at a time (Troy Smith) whereas some universities who shall not be named (Big Blue) have boosters that have handed out hundreds of thousands of dollars (Fab 5). It's simply not in our Booster's budget, apparently. :)
  • karen lotz
    DanWetzel Dan Wetzel
    Ohio State meeting over in a brisk 3.5 hours. Like I said this morning, Bucks in clear, NCAA charged them w little
  • vball10set
    karen lotz;859970 wrote:DanWetzel Dan Wetzel

    Will we still have to wait about 6 weeks for final verdict?
  • karen lotz
    Not sure if it will be 6 weeks, but it won't be today or anytime relatively soon.

    Also, Tressel walked out of the conference room and said "We're done," but declined further comment. He did give the media guys there a written statement that should be posted somewhere online soon.
  • Writerbuckeye
    Six weeks if they do it faster than normal. The NCAA is not known for expediting anything. :)
  • karen lotz
    PDBuckeyes Doug Lesmerises
    Ohio st giving back money made from sugar bowl
    Ohio state expects ncaa decision in 8 to 12 weeks
    Gene smith acknowledges letter sent from ncaa enforce staff to committee on infract last month on status of case. Said osu didn't receive it
    Money given back by osu is school's share from big ten payment for sugar bowl
  • karen lotz
    PDBuckeyes Doug Lesmerises
    Copy of letter to Ohio State on July 13 on status of investigation, reference to one additional allegation bit.ly/pNy4ZD
    Letter says if more allegations found from ongoing investigation, could lead to lack of institutional control. Makes sense.
  • WebFire
    Writerbuckeye;859957 wrote:Unlikely. Our boosters only hand out about $500 at a time (Troy Smith) whereas some universities who shall not be named (Big Blue) have boosters that have handed out hundreds of thousands of dollars (Fab 5). It's simply not in our Booster's budget, apparently. :)

    Yeah Michigan fucked up by giving him a hotel room. If not for that, history may be different.
  • WebFire
    karen lotz;860032 wrote:PDBuckeyes Doug Lesmerises

    So ESPN didn't lie after all. Interesting.
  • se-alum
    WebFire;860057 wrote:So ESPN didn't lie after all. Interesting.
    That email is from 7/13/11, not last week like ESPN claimed.
  • WebFire
    So that's the crime?
  • se-alum
    WebFire;860064 wrote:So that's the crime?

    It shows that letter is not the one Forde was referencing.
  • karen lotz
    se-alum;860082 wrote:It shows that letter is not the one Forde was referencing.


    He was wrong about when the letter was sent. Probably because it wasn't brought to his attention until last week, and he didn't actually see the date on the letter. Was he correct about the letter's content?
  • se-alum
    karen lotz;860094 wrote:He was wrong about when the letter was sent. Probably because it wasn't brought to his attention until last week, and he didn't actually see the date on the letter. Was he correct about the letter's content?
    It seems some of his story had some truth to it. You still think that this guy publishing a national article based on misinformation is ok, even though the end result was accurate??
  • WebFire
    karen lotz;860094 wrote:He was wrong about when the letter was sent. Probably because it wasn't brought to his attention until last week, and he didn't actually see the date on the letter. Was he correct about the letter's content?

    This is what I assume. He didn't get the info until last week. I'd have to look at the original story and see how he reference the dates.
  • WebFire
    se-alum;860112 wrote:It seems some of his story had some truth to it. You still think that this guy publishing a national article based on misinformation is ok, even though the end result was accurate??

    The end result being correct sure is a lot better than having wrong date!
  • stroups
    The letter didn't get sent to OSU. It went from the NCAA directly to COI.
  • WebFire
    The NCAA notified Ohio State by letter last week that it is still investigating other issues involving the program.
    Yes, he certainly was incorrect about when the letter was received. Seems like a technicality though compared to putting out a false story.
  • WebFire
    stroups;860118 wrote:The letter didn't get sent to OSU. It went from the NCAA directly to COI.

    True also.
  • Midstate01
    So the "new" allegation is player h. So osu already had covered that. So good news for osu.
  • bases_loaded
    WebFire;860064 wrote:So that's the crime?

    Its definitively a lie, which is what you asked....so whats your point?
  • stroups
    Midstate01;860125 wrote:So the "new" allegation is player h. So osu already had covered that. So good news for osu.

    Who is Dorian Bell and that is really a non issue at this point.