NCAA having a 2nd investigation on OSU?
-
se-alumFrom Dan Wetzel:
Unless Tressel unexpectedly drops a bombshell, hearing OSU in fine shape today w/ NCAA; additional sanctions unlikely. -
WriterbuckeyeI think It's more likely Ellis is getting money from SI to talk than any hush money. Remember, he wasn't going to talk at all because of fear his identity would come out. Now all of a sudden he's become fearless and has no problem meeting with the NCAA? That reeks of "incentives" coming from SI. They are the ones who have pushed for more harsh punishment, and definitely have a stake in extending the investigation in hopes something else comes up.
-
WebFireWriterbuckeye;859819 wrote:I think It's more likely Ellis is getting money from SI to talk than any hush money. Remember, he wasn't going to talk at all because of fear his identity would come out. Now all of a sudden he's become fearless and has no problem meeting with the NCAA? That reeks of "incentives" coming from SI. They are the ones who have pushed for more harsh punishment, and definitely have a stake in extending the investigation in hopes something else comes up.
That's a good point. But I wouldn't be surprised if he suddenly changes his mind next week if SI gets outbid. -
WriterbuckeyeWebFire;859916 wrote:That's a good point. But I wouldn't be surprised if he suddenly changes his mind next week if SI gets outbid.
Unlikely. Our boosters only hand out about $500 at a time (Troy Smith) whereas some universities who shall not be named (Big Blue) have boosters that have handed out hundreds of thousands of dollars (Fab 5). It's simply not in our Booster's budget, apparently. -
karen lotzDanWetzel Dan WetzelOhio State meeting over in a brisk 3.5 hours. Like I said this morning, Bucks in clear, NCAA charged them w little
-
vball10setkaren lotz;859970 wrote:DanWetzel Dan Wetzel
Will we still have to wait about 6 weeks for final verdict? -
karen lotzNot sure if it will be 6 weeks, but it won't be today or anytime relatively soon.
Also, Tressel walked out of the conference room and said "We're done," but declined further comment. He did give the media guys there a written statement that should be posted somewhere online soon. -
WriterbuckeyeSix weeks if they do it faster than normal. The NCAA is not known for expediting anything.
-
karen lotzPDBuckeyes Doug LesmerisesOhio st giving back money made from sugar bowlOhio state expects ncaa decision in 8 to 12 weeksGene smith acknowledges letter sent from ncaa enforce staff to committee on infract last month on status of case. Said osu didn't receive itMoney given back by osu is school's share from big ten payment for sugar bowl
-
karen lotzPDBuckeyes Doug LesmerisesCopy of letter to Ohio State on July 13 on status of investigation, reference to one additional allegation bit.ly/pNy4ZDLetter says if more allegations found from ongoing investigation, could lead to lack of institutional control. Makes sense.
-
WebFireWriterbuckeye;859957 wrote:Unlikely. Our boosters only hand out about $500 at a time (Troy Smith) whereas some universities who shall not be named (Big Blue) have boosters that have handed out hundreds of thousands of dollars (Fab 5). It's simply not in our Booster's budget, apparently.
Yeah Michigan fucked up by giving him a hotel room. If not for that, history may be different. -
WebFirekaren lotz;860032 wrote:PDBuckeyes Doug Lesmerises
So ESPN didn't lie after all. Interesting. -
se-alum
That email is from 7/13/11, not last week like ESPN claimed.WebFire;860057 wrote:So ESPN didn't lie after all. Interesting. -
WebFireSo that's the crime?
-
se-alumWebFire;860064 wrote:So that's the crime?
It shows that letter is not the one Forde was referencing. -
karen lotzse-alum;860082 wrote:It shows that letter is not the one Forde was referencing.
He was wrong about when the letter was sent. Probably because it wasn't brought to his attention until last week, and he didn't actually see the date on the letter. Was he correct about the letter's content? -
se-alum
It seems some of his story had some truth to it. You still think that this guy publishing a national article based on misinformation is ok, even though the end result was accurate??karen lotz;860094 wrote:He was wrong about when the letter was sent. Probably because it wasn't brought to his attention until last week, and he didn't actually see the date on the letter. Was he correct about the letter's content? -
WebFirekaren lotz;860094 wrote:He was wrong about when the letter was sent. Probably because it wasn't brought to his attention until last week, and he didn't actually see the date on the letter. Was he correct about the letter's content?
This is what I assume. He didn't get the info until last week. I'd have to look at the original story and see how he reference the dates. -
WebFirese-alum;860112 wrote:It seems some of his story had some truth to it. You still think that this guy publishing a national article based on misinformation is ok, even though the end result was accurate??
The end result being correct sure is a lot better than having wrong date! -
stroupsThe letter didn't get sent to OSU. It went from the NCAA directly to COI.
-
WebFire
Yes, he certainly was incorrect about when the letter was received. Seems like a technicality though compared to putting out a false story.The NCAA notified Ohio State by letter last week that it is still investigating other issues involving the program. -
WebFirestroups;860118 wrote:The letter didn't get sent to OSU. It went from the NCAA directly to COI.
True also. -
Midstate01So the "new" allegation is player h. So osu already had covered that. So good news for osu.
-
bases_loadedWebFire;860064 wrote:So that's the crime?
Its definitively a lie, which is what you asked....so whats your point? -
stroupsMidstate01;860125 wrote:So the "new" allegation is player h. So osu already had covered that. So good news for osu.
Who is Dorian Bell and that is really a non issue at this point.