Mock BCS standings per ESPN

• WebFire

  I didn't know contradiction was a compliment.
• sleeper

  

  WebFire;519608 wrote:I didn't know contradiction was a compliment.

  
  If you're better than 95% of the country, you can still lose to Ohio State. How is that a contradiction? Where did you go to school again?
  
  Never mind, who cares, enjoy getting STOMPED on by Ohio State in a month or so.
• krambman

  

  sleeper;519611 wrote:If you're better than 95% of the country, you can still lose to Ohio State. How is that a contradiction? Where did you go to school again?
  
  Never mind, who cares, enjoy getting STOMPED on by Ohio State in a month or so.

  sleeper;519353 wrote:If Ohio State wins out, they will be in the title game. I don't care if half the country is undefeated, this is Ohio State, and we going to win the whole damn thing.
  
  Don't worry about the computer rankings, Ohio State still has to play Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan, all teams that are better than 95% of the country.

  sleeper;519358 wrote:Nobody cares about Michigan, they are a joke, and they already have another guaranteed loss when they come to the shoe, and get absolutely stomped.

  I don't really think this needs an explanation.
• sleeper

  

  It's all relative I suppose. From the Ohio State perspective(which is my perspective), Michigan is a joke. To 10 of the 12 SEC teams that are overrated year in, year out, they are a national powerhouse.
• KnightRyder

  

  devil1197;516073 wrote:You are really back talking shit about the B10 after last year when I embarassed you on this site?
  
  How fast was Oregon, how many points were they going to put up on our cement slow footed defense?
  
  Fact remains, and there is NO debate or conversation, that when OSU runs the table they will be playing in Arizona on January 10th, 2011. Keep trying to think that but you're delusional if you think an undefeated OSU team will not be in the NCG.

  
  what season will that be. not this one. embarassed again huh? i guess you are use to it by now.
• KnightRyder

  

  devil1197;516093 wrote:And everyone else's Purdue prediction. Nice try.
  
  Fact remains that you ran your mouth so fucking hard all the way up until January 1st when you disappeared. This is the same OSU team who owned basically the same Oregon team. Both programs returned basically everyone of importance (Oregon lost Masoli but they haven't had a hard time replacing QB's in their offense).
  
  So you are telling me that the OSU team, who bitched Oregon just this year is overrated and that the Oregon team is better now? LMAO.
  
  OSU will shoot up the BCS charts with their schedule, that is a fact. They already hold a dominant lead in the Coaches Poll.

  
  OSU is really shooting up the polls now, how dominant is that lead.
• KnightRyder

  

  devil1197;516110 wrote:If the Rose Bowl game was so meangingless then why did you spend so much time trying to tell us how Oregon was going to pound OSU?
  
  Like I said, OSU is #1 in the Coaches Poll. They will shoot up the rankings with their schedule coming up and WHEN, not if, WHEN they go undefeated they will be heading to Arizona for the NCG.

  
  WHEN, not if, WHEN they go undefeated? ignorance is bliss
• like_that

  

  I won't be surprised if Alabama finds a way to sneak in the NT game. I can see Oklahoma losing to Nebraska, and I can see Oregon getting upset before the season is over.
• Hb31187

  

  devil1197;516116 wrote:Exactly.
  
  They will argue until the end, but win out and I'll be in Arizona on January 10th, 2011 watching my Buckeyes in the NCG.

  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A
• KnightRyder

  

  devil1197;516116 wrote:Exactly.
  
  They will argue until the end, but win out and I'll be in Arizona on January 10th, 2011 watching my Buckeyes in the NCG.

  
  hope you didnt purchase non refundable tickets
• krambman

  

  KnightRyder;522260 wrote:what season will that be. not this one. embarassed again huh? i guess you are use to it by now.

  KnightRyder;522274 wrote:OSU is really shooting up the polls now, how dominant is that lead.

  KnightRyder;522285 wrote:WHEN, not if, WHEN they go undefeated? ignorance is bliss

  KnightRyder;522304 wrote:hope you didnt purchase non refundable tickets

  
  Troll much?
• KnightRyder

  

  krambman;522407 wrote:Troll much?

  
  i detect some sour grapes
• jordo212000

  

  PLAYOFF
• WebFire

  jordo212000;523576 wrote:PLAYOFF

  
  +10000000000000000
• like_that

  

  WebFire;523822 wrote:+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

  
  Fixed.
• LRB54

  the bcs ... bowl commitment sucks... PLAYOFF ANYONE?
• vball10set

  nah....I like the controversy
• jordo212000

  

  vball10set;523947 wrote:nah....I like the controversy

  We can have controversey on who makes it to the playoffs. The BCS is garbage.
• stlouiedipalma

  If we want to see a playoff, the undefeated teams who don't play each other need to run the table. If you only have two undefeated teams at the end of the season there's no controversy. If you have 4 left, then the shit hits the fan.
• Con_Alma

  We don't need an undisputed champion. Heck, when it comes to college sports we don't even need a champion.
  
  I have no problem with the old bowl game scenario. The BCS is a result of money and people crying for a new way to crown a champion.
  
  Well, the NCAA gave it to them.
• vball10set

  personally, I like the old bowl system as well...$$$ talks, baby
• WebFire

  You could have a playoff and still retain the bowls and the money. Not sure why this is so hard.
• enigmaax

  WebFire;527237 wrote:You could have a playoff and still retain the bowls and the money. Not sure why this is so hard.

  
  So, let's see the business plan. I know, from the other thread, that you don't really think things through.
• WebFire

  enigmaax;527264 wrote:So, let's see the business plan. I know, from the other thread, that you don't really think things through.

  
  Jesus, are you serious?
• enigmaax

  WebFire;527403 wrote:Jesus, are you serious?

  
  No, I'm not. Because neither are you.