Archive

Infractions and Warnings Thread

  • DeadliestWarrior34
    The level of QQing in this thread is too damn high.
  • sleeper
    And now I'm banned. Wow.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    what for?
  • hoops23
    DeadliestWarrior34;1223597 wrote:The level of QQing in this thread is too damn high.

    Quit QQing about our QQing, QQer.

    I'll honor my basement ban even though I was unbanned. I will not post outside of the basement for a week. This way, everybody can be happy.
  • sleeper
    Raw Dawgin' it;1223625 wrote:what for?
    http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?35325-In-an-accident-with-someone-who-has-no-auto-insurance-...&p=1223537&viewfull=1#post1223537
    LJ might be a lawyer, but I don't know so you'll have to ask him.
    By O-trap in his own thread. If that isn't bias, call me Shirley.
  • mcburg93
    Hey shirley how yea doing. Now GFY
  • sleeper
    mcburg93;1223650 wrote:Hey shirley how yea doing. Now GFY
    Oh gosh a rudides, GFY. All this forum consists of is a bunch of mods who need need to go fuck themselves and a bunch of QQ'rs who probably need to go fuck themselves too. I know sometimes I get a little out of control and tell people to GFY, etc., but inside I'm really just WHAT THE SHIT GO FUCK YOURSELF. God damn.

    /mcburg'd
  • O-Trap
    Bias? How? I actually like the legitimate topics and posts you bring to the forum. Why the hell would I want you in the basement? Why couldn't you just stop with the LJ swipes after you were specifically told that it wasn't allowed?

    You're grasping at straws. You can keep trying all you like, but it's ridiculous.

    EDIT: "Shirley."
  • mcburg93
    sleeper;1223652 wrote:Oh gosh a rudides, GFY. All this forum consists of is a bunch of mods who need need to go fuck themselves and a bunch of QQ'rs who probably need to go fuck themselves too. I know sometimes I get a little out of control and tell people to GFY, etc., but inside I'm really just WHAT THE SHIT GO FUCK YOURSELF. God damn.

    /mcburg'd
    Unfortunately I am not allowed to rep you cause you are on basement ban. But once you are off of the ban will give you reps for above post. well played sir.
  • sleeper
    O-Trap;1223654 wrote:Bias? How? I actually like the legitimate topics and posts you bring to the forum. Why the hell would I want you in the basement? Why couldn't you just stop with the LJ swipes after you were specifically told that it wasn't allowed?

    You're grasping at straws. You can keep trying all you like, but it's ridiculous.

    EDIT: "Shirley."
    Sheesh, sorry for trying to direct you to LJ, I thought he was a lawyer based on the data that I've received from him over the years on this forum. I could be wrong, that isn't worthy of an infraction.
  • O-Trap
    sleeper;1223658 wrote:Sheesh, sorry for trying to direct you to LJ, I thought he was a lawyer based on the data that I've received from him over the years on this forum. I could be wrong, that isn't worthy of an infraction.
    Apology accepted. No you didn't. It was infraction-worthy. gosh a ruddies I'll GFM now.
  • sleeper
    The OC's plan to grow the forum:

    Step 1. Ban all of the active users on ticky tack grey area rules
    Step 2. Have all banned users make troll accounts while banned thus giving the appearance of growth
    Step 3. ????
    Step 4. Profit.
  • sleeper
    O-Trap;1223661 wrote:Apology accepted. No you didn't. It was infraction-worthy. gosh a ruddies I'll GFM now.
    So I write, "Hey you should go ask Mcburg since I think he's a lawyer." Is that an infractable offense?
  • O-Trap
    sleeper;1223662 wrote:Ban all of the active users on ticky tack grey area rules

    Perhaps you're dense, but after a warning, that pretty much removes the "grey" [sic] area.
    sleeper;1223663 wrote:So I write, "Hey you should go ask Mcburg since I think he's a lawyer." Is that an infractable offense?
    If you've established a pattern of harassing mcburg by mockingly suggesting his expertise in everything, yes.
  • sleeper
    Good to know we have to have every available piece of information on a user before we can make a post about said user. Should work well with the anonymous nature of the internet, great, wonderful, where do I sign up?
  • O-Trap
    sleeper;1223667 wrote:Good to know we have to have every available piece of information on a user before we can make a post about said user. Should work well with the anonymous nature of the internet, great, wonderful, where do I sign up?
    Perhaps you missed what I said, since that wasn't, at all, anything close to the precedent I set with that post.

    You might know nothing or everything about someone. It makes no difference. Not a part of the equation. What IS part of the equation? A repeated pattern of mocking a specific poster, PARTICULARLY after being warned about it.

    Is that clear enough for you, or do I need to make it even more basic so I can spoon-feed it to you?
  • sleeper
    O-Trap;1223671 wrote:Perhaps you missed what I said, since that wasn't, at all, anything close to the precedent I set with that post.

    You might know nothing or everything about someone. It makes no difference. Not a part of the equation. What IS part of the equation? A repeated pattern of mocking a specific poster, PARTICULARLY after being warned about it.

    Is that clear enough for you, or do I need to make it even more basic so I can spoon-feed it to you?
    Define repeated.
  • O-Trap
    sleeper;1223673 wrote:Define repeated.
    To the degree that it is noticeable. DEFINITELY once you've been warned.

    Just let me know if you need your hand held with anything else. It's what we're here for.
  • like_that
    sleeper;1223662 wrote:The OC's plan to grow the forum:

    Step 1. Ban all of the active users on ticky tack grey area rules
    Step 2. Have all banned users make troll accounts while banned thus giving the appearance of growth
    Step 3. ????
    Step 4. Profit.

    Lol'd.
  • Sonofanump
    sleeper;1223662 wrote:The OC's plan to grow the forum:

    Step 1. Ban all of the active users on ticky tack grey area rules
    Step 2. Have all banned users make troll accounts while banned thus giving the appearance of growth
    Step 3. ????
    Step 4. Profit.
    That is funny, I'd rep you if I could.
  • like_that
    It's ok sleeper. Next time just make an insult to an ambiguous group, but be sure to make It unclear as to the individual you are actually insulting(even though it is clear). If that makes sense to you, O-Trap lets those posts go no matter how malicious they are. Check the last GOAT thread for an example.
  • O-Trap
    like_that;1223685 wrote:It's ok sleeper. Next time just make an insult to an ambiguous group, but be sure to make It unclear as to the individual you are actually insulting(even though it is clear). If that makes sense to you, O-Trap lets those posts go no matter how malicious they are. Check the last GOAT thread for an example.
    They don't break the rules, I don't think. Knock yourself out.
  • sleeper
    I'll just make vague references to LJ.

    "You should ask that guy who pretends he knows everything and probably is a lawyer. I'll send that guy a PM."

    These types of posts are just killing the forum. :rolleyes:
  • like_that
    sleeper;1223700 wrote:I'll just make vague references to LJ.

    "You should ask that guy who pretends he knows everything and probably is a lawyer. I'll send that guy a PM."

    These types of posts are just killing the forum. :rolleyes:
    Yes, exactly what I am talking about. You will be safe now.
  • O-Trap


    I'm starting to doubt that you could graduate from tOSU.