Infractions and Warnings Thread

• Weeper

  

  Those who are sinner shall be punished. Those who cannot accept punishment are weak.
  
  I see a lot of weak people here.
• hoops23

  

  sleeper;1223009 wrote:Let's examine this for a second.
  
  #1: Is Apple a liberal? I would say so based on his posts.
  #2: Is Apple a piece of trash? Maybe, as we do not for sure if he is a person or a piece of trash.
  
  Given what we know, the above does not constitute as trolling. I would appeal based on Section 45:1b on the OC code stating "And therein, thereforth, a trolling expression shall be allowable if said expression is factually based AND/OR reasonably factually based on the current evidence".
  
  I seriously think the OC book of rules is getting longer than the US tax code.

  Yes, exactly.
  
  Also, I do believe we were told not too long ago that the occasional "ball busting" was ok, but it was the constant personal attacks that would be infracted.
  
  I guess that was a lie as well. OC, we make up rules on the fly!
• sleeper

  

  And let's be honest here, we all love Apple, but if he reported that post I hope he DIES IN A FUCKING FIRE THAT MOTHERFUCKING PIECE OF LIBERAL TRASH.
• like_that

  

  sleeper;1223009 wrote:Let's examine this for a second.
  
  #1: Is Apple a liberal? I would say so based on his posts.
  #2: Is Apple a piece of trash? Maybe, as we do not for sure if he is a person or a piece of trash.
  
  Given what we know, the above does not constitute as trolling. I would appeal based on Section 45:1b on the OC code stating "And therein, thereforth, a trolling expression shall be allowable if said expression is factually based AND/OR reasonably factually based on the current evidence".
  
  I seriously think the OC book of rules is getting longer than the US tax code.

  
  It's actually a short rule book. It states " infract on your own judgement. Biases are highly encouraged. Enjoy!"
• wildcats20

  

  sleeper;1223018 wrote:And let's be honest here, we all love Apple, but if he reported that post I hope he DIES IN A FUCKING FIRE THAT MOTHERFUCKING PIECE OF LIBERAL TRASH.

  He didn't.
• Weeper

  

  Sleeper: The expert on Hell since 1987
• hoops23

  

  like_that;1223019 wrote:It's actually a short rule book. It states " infract on your own judgement. Biases are highly encouraged. Enjoy!"

  lol, true.
• hoops23

  

  wildcats20;1223020 wrote:He didn't.

  Then that makes it even worse.
• Dr. KnOiTaLL

  

  [h=2]You have received a warning at Ohio Chatter | General Chat and Ohio High School Sports Talk[/h][INDENT]Dear Dr. KnOiTaLL,
  
  You have received a warning at Ohio Chatter | General Chat and Ohio High School Sports Talk.
  
  Reason:
  -------
  Rules warning
  
  The pet names are a no no.
  -------
  
  Original Post:
  http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1211604
  
  haha... failhook...
  
  
  Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum's rules, which you are expected to understand and follow.
  
  All the best,
  Ohio Chatter | General Chat and Ohio High School Sports Talk[/INDENT]
• ts1227

  

  Weeper;1223012 wrote:Those who are sinner shall be punished. Those who cannot accept punishment are weak.
  
  I see a lot of weak people here.

  
  thanks isadore
• sleeper

  

  wildcats20;1223020 wrote:He didn't.

  Then my rage is misguided. Apologies to Apple.
• Weeper

  

  This Isadore, I have read his posts. I believe him to be a demon trying to turn those of this community to Satan.
• Tigerfan00

  

  Found a picture from the last moderator meeting.
  
  
• like_that

  

  Wes and heretic are the only two mods (who i actually see post) that have stuck to the original principals of the OC.
  
  Just wanted to make that clear so they know my thoughts aren't attacking them.
  
  (I'm not counting new mods. Not enough data on them)
• hoops23

  

  My infracted post was made at 2:45 today.... Why did it take nearly 8 hours to infract if it was that "offensive" to induce a week ban? lol...
• Weeper

  

  Patience is the work of God.
  
  Rebellion is the work of the Devil.
• Tigerfan00

  

  hoops23;1223039 wrote:My infracted post was made at 2:45 today.... Why did it take nearly 8 hours to infract if it was that "offensive" to induce a week ban? lol...

  They are like a jury taking 8 hours to brainstorm something so simple.
  
  Also, it doesnt matter what you think or want. /LJ'd
• wildcats20

  

  hoops23;1223039 wrote:My infracted post was made at 2:45 today.... Why did it take nearly 8 hours to infract if it was that "offensive" to induce a week ban? lol...

  Not everyone sits at a computer all day...
  
  
  Plus it was reversed...
• sleeper

  

  Tigerfan00;1223046 wrote:They are like a jury taking 8 hours to brainstorm something so simple.
  
  Also, it doesnt matter what you think or want. /LJ'd

  Tigerfan00 is really bringing on the lulz lately. reps.
• se-alum

  

  Ahhh, the boys are back and whining, or what do you call it? Being "active"?
• sleeper

  

  se-alum;1223079 wrote:Ahhh, the boys are back and whining, or what do you call it? Being "active"?

  Looks like someone is mad their infraction got reversed. How does it feel to be a failure? LOL
• se-alum

  

  sleeper;1223087 wrote:Looks like someone is mad their infraction got reversed. How does it feel to be a failure? LOL

  You called it, i'm pissed!! Or not, being that this internet message board is your life, not mine.
• rmolin73

  

  
  
  Someone needs fed, or their diaper changed.
• hoops23

  

  wildcats20;1223050 wrote:Not everyone sits at a computer all day...
  
  
  Plus it was reversed...

  You have more posts than me, what exactly is your point?
• hoops23

  

  And it wasn't reversed, as I'm still banned lol. Whatever.