Infractions and Warnings Thread
-
ernest_t_bass
wildcats20;1251094 wrote:You did? You bastard.
Hell yeah! Fuck head! -
O-Trap
What about just not calling someone "fuck head?"ernest_t_bass;1251017 wrote:Lol. That sucks. I'd like to see temporary thread bans. For example, I think I called wildcats a fuck head, or something like that, in the nba finals thread, very early in the series. I don't think that warrants a thread ban for the rest of the series. A game? That sounds more like it.
Might not be a bad idea. Google is, ultimately, the reason that "everything" can't be let go like it used to be. That precedent changed because of Google writing Justin an email threatening to suspend his AdSense account unless he cleaned shit up, as I recall.like_that;1251022 wrote:Well you know my stance. Just let everything go, but it doesn't seem like that will be happening. I do think thread banning is the second best solution. Maybe not overkill. First thread ban is a couple days to a week. That would be a little "we are not fucking around" warning. After that you get the ban for life from the thread.
The rules here, though not perfect, are a necessary evil in order to keep the site functioning. As Justin is trying to get AdSense back (or he was the last I heard), it wouldn't be the best idea to give them ammunition.
However, I do think this topic could potentially be re-entered if the site was able to gain enough sponsoring to make it not need AdSense. Ultimately, I hope that happens. I don't like having the rules that are in place, but I get why we currently have them and why we need to. -
ernest_t_bass
O-Trap;1251178 wrote:What about just not calling someone "fuck head?".
Drunken post. Banning someone from a thread for one inherent post is retarded. GFY -
O-Trap
Inherent? I'm not sure you know what that word means.ernest_t_bass;1251183 wrote:Drunken post. Banning someone from a thread for one inherent post is retarded. GFY
And drunken post doesn't matter, I don't think. If I slug my boss because I'm drunk, I'm still a dumbass for doing it, and I'll still have consequences.
Not being able to refrain from calling someone "fuck head" is what is actually retarded.
Oh, and kindly go fulfill yourself. -
Pick6
You're slipping OTrap.O-Trap;1251195 wrote:Inherent? I'm not sure you know what that word means.
And drunken post doesn't matter, I don't think. If I slug my boss because I'm drunk, I'm still a dumbass for doing it, and I'll still have consequences.
Not being able to refrain from calling someone "fuck head" is what is actually retarded.
Oh, and kindly go fulfill yourself.
http://m.dictionary.com/d/?q=inherent&o=0&l=dir
Edit: Derp I read your post wrong. It's too late -
said_aouita
'k.like_that;1250999 wrote:We don't need/want your discussion. You add nothing. You can go fuck yourself though if that makes you feel better!
It's sad even in the basement you can throw out disrespectful statements like "go fuck yourself" and nothing happens, but if you post something maybe others disagrees with about a pro team you are removed from a thread with out explanation.
When will the "removed from discussion" be removed? -
Glory Days
There have been a lot of fucks given lately. Didnt think you guys had any left. -
like_that
If you are going to pretend like you don't give a shit by saying "k," then stick with it. Couldn't help yourself though I see.said_aouita;1251213 wrote:'k.
QQ
It's sad even in the basement you can throw out disrespectful statements like "go fuck yourself" and nothing happens, but if you post something maybe others disagrees with about a pro team you are removed from a thread with out explanation.
When will the "removed from discussion" be removed?
Anything goes in the basement, that's why it was created dumbass (see, the basement allows me to call you a dumbass without any consequences.) Justin wants to eliminate thread derailing. There was nothing to agree/disagree with about your post. You were simply being a troll and trying to derail the thread (after numerous attempts). Don't worry though, nobody misses your "controllbutions" to the thread. You are fighting your own fight, and you sure won't get any Browns fans on that thread to vouch for you. Enjoy QQing about it though.
Cue your cop out attempt to pretend you don't care. -
said_aouita
why are you so angry, like_that?like_that;1251223 wrote:
Cue your cop out attempt to pretend you don't care.
If I didn't care, I would not ask to be allowed back. If I cared less about the Browns, I would not even bother trolling them.
I admitted I'm a casual NFL fan. I apologized for my "trolling" done in the Browns thread. I understand what I may consider funny (my Browns to the CFL comment) some hard core fans like yourself may not approve.
When individuals make a mistake and are temporary banned, eventually they are allowed back. -
like_that
All is well over here.said_aouita;1251238 wrote:why are you so angry, like_that?
If I didn't care, I would not ask to be allowed back. If I cared less about the Browns, I would not even bother trolling them.
I admitted I'm a casual NFL fan. I apologized for my "trolling" done in the Browns thread. I understand what I may consider funny (my Browns to the CFL comment) some hard core fans like yourself may not approve.
When individuals make a mistake and are temporary banned, eventually they are allowed back.
So, you admit to trolling? Got it. Your reputation precedes you when it comes to the Browns. You aren't fooling anybody. We can see through the bullshit. Anyway, I am off to discuss this week's preseason game. You should join in... Oh my bad lol lol lol. -
O-Trap
I was gonna say!Pick6;1251198 wrote:You're slipping OTrap.
http://m.dictionary.com/d/?q=inherent&o=0&l=dir
Edit: Derp I read your post wrong. It's too late
No worries.
-
ernest_t_bass
O-Trap;1251268 wrote:I was gonna say!
No worries.
It sounded good when I drunk typed it, lol -
O-Trap
Self-awareness, my friend, is key. If you know you're drunk, and it sounds good, it's probably not good.ernest_t_bass;1251285 wrote:It sounded good when I drunk typed it, lol