Archive

Pitbulls are for poor stupid people

  • lhslep134
    Dumb thread.
  • bigkahuna
    lhslep134;1204305 wrote:Dumb thread.
    This.
  • O-Trap
    Honestly, tackle it.

    People are so afraid of pitbulls because they are strong for their size and have sharp teeth, but a strong 45-pound dog is still just a 45-pound dog, and a grown man should be able to handle a 45-pound animal.

    Yeah, I'm with isidore on this one. If a dog attacks a child, attack the dog. I would imagine most full-grown men are stronger than a dog.
  • THE4RINGZ
    BR1986FB;1204302 wrote:Point taken. 4Ringz "Glock" comment threw me off.

    Guess if you're going to try to take care of it you'll need to (and I can't believe I'm saying this) use Isadore's advice and "bare hand" it.

    The gun was assumed in that it's likely the only way you're going to take down a pit before it does significant damage IF it's owner trained it as an attack dog. If he didn't you probably have nothing to worry about in the first place.

    I think you are reading too much into my comment. My response was tongue in cheek, given the scenario described it seemed like a safe assumption that someone in the area would be carrying a handgun. No more, no less.

    I would never advocate shooting a dog unless it was done humanly to put a dog out of its misery.
  • Steel Valley Football
    LJ;1204289 wrote:Have fun in court. Ohio law states you can only kill a dog to protect people or livestock. Cats and dogs are neither.

    I doubt I'll have fun, but I certainly would expect to face and deal with any charges that result from each law that I broke.

    Though, I'm not sure a charge like that would stick with multiple children in close proximity. Also, thanks for posting. I was not clear on the law regarding the killing of dangerous dogs.
  • isadore
    O-Trap;1204309 wrote:Honestly, tackle it.

    People are so afraid of pitbulls because they are strong for their size and have sharp teeth, but a strong 45-pound dog is still just a 45-pound dog, and a grown man should be able to handle a 45-pound animal.
    probably true, they are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.
  • BR1986FB
    THE4RINGZ;1204311 wrote:I think you are reading too much into my comment. My response was tongue in cheek, given the scenario described it seemed like a safe assumption that someone in the area would be carrying a handgun. No more, no less.

    I would never advocate shooting a dog unless it was done humanly to put a dog out of its misery.
    Not at all. Don't doubt that you were joking but once I saw the mention of a gun in the thread, for some reason, my brain switched to "he's gonna shoot it." After going back and looking at the top of the thread I realized that he had no intention of taking a gun. My bad....not enough coffee yet. :D
  • Steel Valley Football
    O-Trap;1204309 wrote:Honestly, tackle it.

    People are so afraid of pitbulls because they are strong for their size and have sharp teeth, but a strong 45-pound dog is still just a 45-pound dog, and a grown man should be able to handle a 45-pound animal.

    Yeah, I'm with isidore on this one. If a dog attacks a child, attack the dog. I would imagine most full-grown men are stronger than a dog.
    The decision has already been made. If a vicious dog attacks one of my children or another child in my presence, I'm going to kill it with something. I just haven't figured out with what yet.
  • skank
    Ironman92;1204266 wrote:Print off a copy of the Finals Thread and make it read it.


    Fact, most dogs can't read.
  • Steel Valley Football
    THE4RINGZ;1204311 wrote:I think you are reading too much into my comment. My response was tongue in cheek, given the scenario described it seemed like a safe assumption that someone in the area would be carrying a handgun. No more, no less.

    I would never advocate shooting a dog unless it was done humanly to put a dog out of its misery.

    I'm 100% with you on that. Unless it's biting someone who can't protect themself.
  • O-Trap
    isadore;1204314 wrote:probably true, they are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.
    As are human beings.
    Steel Valley Football;1204321 wrote:The decision has already been made. If a vicious dog attacks one of my children or another child in my presence, I'm going to kill it with something. I just haven't figured out with what yet.
    Bare hands. Your children will not be in any "line of fire," and I'm sure that you're strong enough to kill a 45-pound animal with your bare hands. Lowest risk to the kids, with a still-high chance of success.
  • Automatik
    Steel Valley Football;1204321 wrote:The decision has already been made. If a vicious dog attacks one of my children or another child in my presence, I'm going to kill it with something. I just haven't figured out with what yet.
    Why don't you contact the correct authorities or talk to the owner and prevent the entire situation. You know...like a NORMAL person would do.

    lmao...wtf is wrong with people these days. :laugh:
  • O-Trap
    Automatik;1204326 wrote:Why don't you contact the correct authorities or talk to the owner and prevent the entire situation. You know...like a NORMAL person would do.

    lmao...wtf is wrong with people these days. :laugh:
    GTFO WITH THAT COMMON SENSE S***!!!!
  • Con_Alma
    isadore;1204314 wrote:probably true, they are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.
    What wouldn't be more successful at killing the more vulnerable?
  • isadore
    isadore wrote: probably true, they (pit bulls) are much more successful at killing the young or the aged.
    O-trap wrote:As are human beings.
    No, pit bulls are most likely to kill very young and very old people. Humans are least likely to kill the very young and the very old.
    http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0311.pdf
  • Con_Alma
    isadore;1204332 wrote:No, pit bulls are most likely to kill very young and very old people. Humans are least likely to kill the very young and the very old.
    http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0311.pdf
    Likely wasn't the operative word. Successful was.
  • justincredible
    If you're that worried about it just keep small pocket knife or something in your pocket that you can use after tackling it. No danger of hurting anyone else but a little extra help than just going in bare handed. But seriously, I highly doubt this scenario ever takes shape and obviously hope it doesn't.
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    Oh great - another pitbulls are killers thread....
  • Rotinaj
    isadore;1204332 wrote:No, pit bulls are most likely to kill very young and very old people. Humans are least likely to kill the very young and the very old.
    http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0311.pdf
    Actually pit bulls are most likely NOT to kill at all.
  • isadore
    Automatik;1204326 wrote:Why don't you contact the correct authorities or talk to the owner and prevent the entire situation. You know...like a NORMAL person would do.

    lmao...wtf is wrong with people these days. :laugh:
    obviously talking to the owner would be a waste of time.
  • isadore
    Rotinaj;1204337 wrote:Actually pit bulls are most likely NOT to kill at all.
    much more likely than any other type of dog.
  • BR1986FB
    isadore;1204338 wrote:obviously talking to the owner would be a waste of time.
    And you know this HOW? You're VERY good at profiling people and animals.
  • isadore
    Con_Alma;1204333 wrote:Likely wasn't the operative word. Successful was.
    if the goal is killing the young or the old pit bulls are more successful
  • Raw Dawgin' it
    BR1986FB;1204340 wrote:And you know this HOW? You're VERY good at profiling people and animals.
    He's the only person I have on my ignore list - i think everyone should follow suit.
  • isadore
    BR1986FB;1204340 wrote:And you know this HOW? You're VERY good at profiling people and animals.
    gosh a ruddies this guy has already shown depraved indifference by bringing his killer dog among other peoples children while he plays basketball.