Steelers vs Panthers.....Thursday Night

• wes_mantooth

  

  Automatik;608780 wrote:I agree, you don't give up the opening kick for a TD and you are in the money. It still doesn't give an excuse for poor officiating.

  
  no excuse for poor officiating, but it is going on all over the league. I think the problem that most have is that some(not all) of these Steelers fans on here are saying that this garbage officiating is only going against the Steelers and it is done with intent to screw them...which is retarded. The officiating needs to be looked at seriously in the offseason...no one will debate that.
• Non

  

  justincredible;608777 wrote:Non, please respond to this post.

  
  well, the penalty on Clark I think turned the Jets drive from a FG to touchown to make it 17-17
  
  so let's say the Jets lead 10-6 at halftime...Steelers only get two FGs
  
  Steelers drive down in the second half to make it 13-10
  
  Jets kick FG 13-13
  
  Jets add FG and safety 18-13
  
  Steelers drive down for TD and win 20-18
  
  that's how it should read in the books
• justincredible

  

  Non;608788 wrote:well, the penalty on Clark I think turned the Jets drive from a FG to touchown to make it 17-17
  
  so let's say the Jets lead 10-6 at halftime...Steelers only get two FGs
  
  Steelers drive down in the second half to make it 13-10
  
  Jets kick FG 13-13
  
  Jets add FG and safety 18-13
  
  Steelers drive down for TD and win 20-18
  
  that's how it should read in the books

  
  Hmmm...it's weird that it reads 22-17, though.
• dat dude

  Non;608788 wrote:well, the penalty on Clark I think turned the Jets drive from a FG to touchown to make it 17-17
  
  so let's say the Jets lead 10-6 at halftime...Steelers only get two FGs
  
  Steelers drive down in the second half to make it 13-10
  
  Jets kick FG 13-13
  
  Jets add FG and safety 18-13
  
  Steelers drive down for TD and win 20-18
  
  that's how it should read in the books

  
  How should the Dolphins game read?
• justincredible

  

  I remember when you still had your sanity. I liked that guy much better.
• Jester

  

  I'm still waiting for you to prove the holding calls. Whether it be the play you first mentioned, or the last two plays since you said you believed holding took place there as well.
• wes_mantooth

  

  justincredible;608793 wrote:I remember when you still had your sanity. I liked that guy much better.

  
  I think automatik is correct...he is just baiting...there is no way this crazy talk is for real.
• Non

  

  Jester;608794 wrote:I'm still waiting for you to prove the holding calls. Whether it be the play you first mentioned, or the last two plays since you said you believed holding took place there as well.

  
  Revis had two hands in the back of the receiver on a previous play. That one was borderline but so was Clark's hit and they called that one.
  
  I don't think even justin would deny that Lowery got away with a hold against Sanders. It was one that you just can't miss in that situation.
• Non

  

  I didn't record the game or I would have them all up here already.
• Jester

  

  I'm not asking for your opinion or what you think happened. I'm asking for solid proof. Pics, vids, anything. If you're going to make outrageous claims, at least have something to back it up. If not, then stfu.
• Non

  

  justincredible;608789 wrote:Hmmm...it's weird that it reads 22-17, though.

  
  it is weird, but better yet, a disgrace
  
  to all those who play or watch the game
• Non

  

  Jester;608806 wrote:I'm not asking for your opinion or what you think happened. I'm asking for solid proof. Pics, vids, anything. If you're going to make outrageous claims, at least have something to back it up. If not, then stfu.

  
  if you didn't watch the game, you stfu
  
  those that watched know what I'm talking about
  
  they don't need proof, the replays were in slow motion and the jersey is being pulled
• justincredible

  

  non, please respond to this post.
  

  justincredible;608779 wrote:Three yards? The CB has a 9 foot arm in order to tug on the jersey?

• Jester

  

  Non;608811 wrote:if you didn't watch the game, you stfu
  
  those that watched know what I'm talking about
  
  they don't need proof, the replays were in slow motion and the jersey is being pulled

  why should i stfu? I'm not the one making stupid claims.
  and really? cuz im pretty sure the majority doesn't feel the same way you do.
  then find the replays. dont make claims you can't back up.
• Non

  

  Jester;608817 wrote:why should i stfu? I'm not the one making stupid claims.
  and really? cuz im pretty sure the majority doesn't feel the same way you do.
  then find the replays. dont make claims you can't back up.

  
  everyone who watched the game knows that I'm right about the holding
  
  there's no need to dig for the replay, it was that obvious when it happened
• justincredible

  

  Non;608809 wrote:it is weird, but better yet, a disgrace
  
  to all those who play or watch the game

  
  Just like the disgrace in the books after the dolphins game.
• Jester

  

  Non;608832 wrote:everyone who watched the game knows that I'm right about the holding
  
  there's no need to dig for the replay, it was that obvious when it happened

  lol. so what youre saying is, you cant prove it.
  exactly what i thought.
• Non

  

  justincredible;608812 wrote:non, please respond to this post.

  
  I was exaggerating. The distance is not that important.
  
  The officials should be watching the game, especially a downfield DB vs. receiver play in the final minute of a close game.
  
  Missing a call of that magnitude has too much of an influence on the outcome.
  
  Pity too because it was a competitive game but we didn't get a fair, legitimate finish.
• Non

  

  Jester;608834 wrote:lol. so what youre saying is, you cant prove it.
  exactly what i thought.

  
  I already said I didn't record it.
  
  When it's on the web somewhere I'll post it.
• justincredible

  

  Non;608840 wrote: Pity too because it was a competitive game but we didn't get a fair, legitimate finish.

  
  Neither did the dolphins.
• Non

  

  justincredible;608845 wrote:Neither did the dolphins.

  
  Dolphins got the benefit of the calls throughout that game to make it close to begin with
• justincredible

  

  Non;608857 wrote:Dolphins got the benefit of the calls throughout that game to make it close to begin with

  
  Of course they did.
• wes_mantooth

  

  lol...this really seems like an exercise in futility....
• justincredible

  

  wes_mantooth;608867 wrote:lol...this really seems like an exercise in futility....

  
  Yeah, I'm done now. Non is either baiting or he has completely lost his mind. Hopefully he's just baiting.
• Automatik

  

  I don't think the Dolphin's bad call is really comparable here. It was a missed call on TD that was close. Unfortunately for Miami there was no evidence for the call to be overturned.
  
  I can't recall any bad goal line decisions this year, besides that one. All of my complaints are with actual penalties called or uncalled.