Steelers vs Panthers.....Thursday Night

• justincredible

  

  Non;608726 wrote:it was clear as day, the dude had his hands tugging on the jersey because he had been beaten
  
  the Steelers were driving down for the winning score, the officials had to help the Jets to hold them back

  
  Ok, if you can assume the Steelers score on that drive I can assume that the Steelers would not have scored when they were given the free first down. Given those circumstances the Steelers would have been down 22-10 on the final drive and the TD would have been meaningless.
• Jester

  

  Non;608726 wrote:it was clear as day, the dude had his hands tugging on the jersey because he had been beaten
  
  the Steelers were driving down for the winning score, the officials had to help the Jets to hold them back

  Didn't watch the game. Prove that there was excessive holding.
• Non

  

  they should call the teams back to Pittsburgh and finish the game again
  
  Steelers have the ball inside the 10 after the holding because the ball was in the air so it was at the spot
  
  30-45 seconds left
  
  just as they earned without the refs stepping in and making sure the Jets held on because they had already lost two in a row and they didn't want the New York team to collapse
• wildcats20

  

  Non;608726 wrote:it was clear as day, the dude had his hands tugging on the jersey because he had been beaten
  
  the Steelers were driving down for the winning score, the officials had to help the Jets to hold them back

  
  But yet somehow, they were still down inside the 10 and COULD NOT get the job done.
  
  Let me guess...there were holding calls on the final 2 throws too??
• wildcats20

  

  Non;608737 wrote:they should call the teams back to Pittsburgh and finish the game again

  
  Are you serious with this post?
• justincredible

  

  wildcats20;608738 wrote:Let me guess...there were holding calls on the final 2 throws too??

  
  Absolutely.
• Automatik

  

  Jester;608736 wrote:Didn't watch the game. Prove that there was excessive holding.

  
  Then how the fuck can you comment?!
  
  They MADE the call earlier in the game against Cromartie, which was an even lesser tug at the jersey, yet miss it at the end of the game? That is my main gripe.... inconsistency.
• wildcats20

  

  justincredible;608741 wrote:Absolutely.

  
  Only holds I saw were from the O Line.
  
  But since the refs are out to get the Steelers and there is a conspiracy out there, they didn't call them....
• justincredible

  

  Is everyone fine with me moving this to the basement and starting a new thread that is 100% on topic about the Carolina game? I don't want to go through and clean this one up.
• Jester

  

  Automatik;608742 wrote:Then how the fuck can you comment?!
  
  They MADE the call earlier in the game against Cromartie, which was an even lesser tug at the jersey, yet miss it at the end of the game? That is my main gripe.... inconsistency.

  It's easy. I type in the little box below and hit reply.
  
  What does me not watching the game have anything to do with Non being able to prove that excessive holding took place?
• Automatik

  

  justincredible;608744 wrote:Is everyone fine with me moving this to the basement and starting a new thread that is 100% on topic about the Carolina game? I don't want to go through and clean this one up.

  
  Go for it.
• Ironman92

  

  Everyone understand your point......I agree with just about everything you've been posting about.........but after 1 or 2 posts you're just feeding the bears....and the bears have endless appetites.
  
  Man you've gotta move on.
• Automatik

  

  Jester;608746 wrote:It's easy. I type in the little box below and hit reply.
  
  What does me not watching the game have anything to do with Non being able to prove that excessive holding took place?

  
  I was referring to the call that your previous reply was in regards to. It was a hold, no doubt about it. If you would have watched you would have agreed.
• Laley23

  

  At least holding is a subjective call, more or less.
  
  The Colts had Jacksonville score on a punt return after the guy signaled for a fair catch!
• justincredible

  

  I really wish I would have dvr'd this game. I want to go back and watch every single play and take note of every single hold on every single play.
• Jester

  

  Thanks, but only I can determine whether or not i'd agree with it. To say that the league is out to get the Steelers is laughable, IMO.
• Automatik

  

  Jester;608759 wrote:Thanks, but only I can determine whether or not i'd agree with it. To say that the league is out to get the Steelers is laughable, IMO.

  
  I agree, I don't think they are out to get them. I just think the officials need to get their heads out of their asses. You can't call that ticky tack hold earlier in the game and then blow an obvious one on the final drive. Its bush league.
  
  Its the fucking best pro league on the planet and they can't get the officiating straight?
• Non

  

  wildcats20;608738 wrote:But yet somehow, they were still down inside the 10 and COULD NOT get the job done.
  
  Let me guess...there were holding calls on the final 2 throws too??

  
  I think so, actually.
  
  But if they had called the blatant, obvious holding that would've been like 30 more seconds.
• Jester

  

  Automatik;608764 wrote:I agree, I don't think they are out to get them. I just think the officials need to get their heads out of their asses. You can't call that ticky tack hold earlier in the game and then blow an obvious one on the final drive. Its bush league.
  
  Its the fucking best pro league on the planet and they can't get the officiating straight?

  They're human. It's part of the game. Calls are missed in every game, every week. If you don't want the officials to have an impact in the game, then don't put the outcome in their hands. The Steelers got beat by the Jets. Not the Jets+the officials+the league+the weather+whatever the hell else people could complain about.
• Non

  

  Laley23;608753 wrote:At least holding is a subjective call, more or less.
  
  The Colts had Jacksonville score on a punt return after the guy signaled for a fair catch!

  
  yeah it's not subjective when the receiver has the CB burnt by three yards and the CB is pulling on the jersey from keeping him catching a winning touchdown
  
  that's holding all the way
  
  so the refs just cheated in this case and that's why it tarnishes the entire game
• justincredible

  

  Non, please respond to this post.
  

  justincredible;608734 wrote:Ok, if you can assume the Steelers score on that drive I can assume that the Steelers would not have scored when they were given the free first down. Given those circumstances the Steelers would have been down 22-10 on the final drive and the TD would have been meaningless.

• Non

  

  wildcats20;608740 wrote:Are you serious with this post?

  
  I'd rather the game be decided by the teams rather than the officials, so yep.
• justincredible

  

  Non;608776 wrote:yeah it's not subjective when the receiver has the CB burnt by three yards and the CB is pulling on the jersey from keeping him catching a winning touchdown
  
  that's holding all the way
  
  so the refs just cheated in this case and that's why it tarnishes the entire game

  
  Three yards? The CB has a 9 foot arm in order to tug on the jersey?
• Automatik

  

  I agree, you don't give up the opening kick for a TD and you are in the money. It still doesn't give an excuse for poor officiating.
• HeathAlum21

  I am just amazed how Non can even type when he is so busy masturbating to a photograph of Polamalu.