Glenn Beck?

• rocketalum

  Don't care for the circus that is his tv show but hey that's the way of modern political commentary, it's what gets viewers which in turn gets ad dollars, which in turn lines Glen's pockets. Can't dislike someone for taking advantage of an opportunity even if it is insanely annoying. His books aren't to bad.
• noreply66

  sometimes hes okay --then
• cbus4life

  He's entertainment, nothing more, nothing less.
  
  Just as nuts as Olbermann, Maddow, etc., on the other side.
  
  The entire group should just fade away, IMO.
• unique_67

  I don't know him as a person, but as the host of a talk/news commentary show I do not like him. I do not have cable, so that makes it easy for me to not watch his TV show, and I simply choose not to listen to his radio show.
• I Wear Pants

  Honestly, I think less of anyone who takes what he says seriously.
• I Wear Pants

  rocketalum wrote: Don't care for the circus that is his tv show but hey that's the way of modern political commentary, it's what gets viewers which in turn gets ad dollars, which in turn lines Glen's pockets. Can't dislike someone for taking advantage of an opportunity even if it is insanely annoying. His books aren't to bad.

  Oh god, you cannot believe how happy I am to see your avatar.
  
  NMH
• Gobuckeyes1

  Tolerable in small doses. Sometimes he makes good points, sometimes he is way out there...
• Elliot Stabler

  I'm really afraid that he is going to have a heart attack on air one of these nights
• dwccrew

  

  GeneralsIcer89 wrote: I think his expose on the American healthcare system while he was on CNN and dealing with his butthurt, and then his later 180? on his views of the system when he went to Fox News are all one needs to see to know he is a snake. He says what the highest bidder wants.

  This. He is a fraud and a whore. Sellout. Entertainer, nothing else.
  

  cbus4life wrote: He's entertainment, nothing more, nothing less.
  
  Just as nuts as Olbermann, Maddow, etc., on the other side.
  
  The entire group should just fade away, IMO.

  This as well. It's sad that some people actually get their "news" from this clown.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  I don't get my news from him but he has done a great job of exposing the trash in the current administration.
• dwccrew

  

  bigdaddy2003 wrote: I don't get my news from him but he has done a great job of exposing the trash in the current administration.

  I don't think it is that hard to expose the trash in this administration, especially when he has all his little helpers at Fox. I could do that show, I just wouldn't be as entertaining, which is the only reason he is there.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  ^ It isn't hard to do but if he didn't then most people would have never found out considering the mainstream media would have never mentioned it.
• Elliot Stabler

  Some of you act like there is anymore "trash" in this administration than any other in history
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Maybe not trash but some radical radical people.
• CenterBHSFan

  

  Elliot Stabler wrote: Some of you act like there is anymore "trash" in this administration than any other in history

  Well, they wouldn't have mentioned it because they wouldn't have looked. GB has really cornered the niche for this.
  ..............
  
  As an aside, was he ever this popular before the Obama administration?
• Elliot Stabler

  Again...no more than any other administration in history
• Elliot Stabler

  I really don't think he's all the popular right now
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Yeah actually I would say there are far more radicals in this administration than any other.
• Elliot Stabler

  bigdaddy2003 wrote: Yeah actually I would say there are far more radicals in this administration than any other.

  Whatever you say my friend
• CenterBHSFan

  

  Well, radical is a term that is subjective. For instance, we can say that our founding fathers were "radical", because they were, from a certain perspective - how England saw them.
  Then, there's radical as in crazy or wild.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  ^ It's cool man. You are obviously a liberal type of guy and you dig the situation we are faced with. I however am not a liberal and don't like the direction in which we are headed.
• bigdaddy2003

  

  CenterBHSFan wrote: Well, radical is a term that is subjective. For instance, we can say that our founding fathers were "radical", because they were, from a certain perspective - how England saw them.
  Then, there's radical as in crazy or wild.

  In this instance I mean radical as in some of their beliefs are out there.
• Elliot Stabler

  bigdaddy2003 wrote: ^ It's cool man. You are obviously a liberal type of guy and you dig the situation we are faced with. I however am not a liberal and don't like the direction in which we are headed.

  Yep...I dig the fact that millions of people are losing or have lost their jobs.
  
  I dig the fact that 10's of millions of people dont have health insurance
  
  I dig the fact that we are fighting a war we shouldn't be.
  
  I dig the fact that we have veterans who are homeless and living on the streets.
  
  Why is it that everybody thinks liberals want everyone to be poor and homeless??
  
  I'm getting sick and tired of it
• bigdaddy2003

  

  Hey man the stimulus will kick in eventually.
• Elliot Stabler

  So you're one of those that think all liberals want people to be poor?