Archive

Trump vs. Hillary (NO OTHER OPTIONS)

  • Fab4Runner
    QuakerOats;1814671 wrote:Lol --- he didn't just win; he buried her, and he didn't he use half the bullets he could have.
    Like I said, the only people I know who claim he won are dumb, uneducated hillbillies who think delivering one liners makes you qualified to be POTUS. Every smart, rational person I know agrees that he is an embarrassment and didn't answer any of the questions in a thoughtful, coherent way.
  • Dr Winston O'Boogie
    QuakerOats;1814671 wrote:Lol --- he didn't just win; he buried her, and he didn't he use half the bullets he could have.
    How in the world did he win? He showed absolutely zero thoughtfulness in any of the issues except to repeat his mantra that Hillary/present state is a "disaster" and he'll fix it. That is meaningless. I believe he uses these phrases because he has no clue what the hell he's talking about. He's not a strong leader; he's a frat boy loudmouth. If he's elected president, we've got a dangerous future ahead of us.
  • QuakerOats
    Fab4Runner;1814674 wrote:Like I said, the only people I know who claim he won are dumb, uneducated hillbillies who think delivering one liners makes you qualified to be POTUS. Every smart, rational person I know agrees that he is an embarrassment and didn't answer any of the questions in a thoughtful, coherent way.

    The people I have talked to today are not dumb, nor uneducated, nor hillbillies. They agree he walloped her; they also agree he did poorly in the first debate. These are educated, professional people that are being objective in their evaluations. I myself started watching the debate thinking this could go downhill quickly and maybe be the end; but amazingly he didn't just turn it around, he won going away.

    Obviously he is far from the best choice, but he is right on the top issues that are critical to our future, and she is dead wrong on them. Beyond that, it is appalling that anyone could support her (especially females) given her personal orchestration in the demonizing and destruction of victims of sexual assault (committed by her husband) in order protect and expand their political ambitions. I am utterly flabbergasted that anyone could support such complicit criminal behavior, especially women.
  • O-Trap
    QuakerOats;1814678 wrote:... that are being objective in their evaluations ...
    Were any of these people voting for Clinton before this debate? If not, I'm not sure I trust this part of your assessment of their reasoning.
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    I was just SJW'd on facebook lol ouch.

    I made a post about how both candidates are bad and both parties messed up and a friend from high school let me know that I was sexist b/c I preferred Bernie or Biden over Clinton and Hillary isn't anymore corrupt than Bernie or Biden, men just don't go after them like they do Hillary.
  • Fab4Runner
    QuakerOats;1814678 wrote:The people I have talked to today are not dumb, nor uneducated, nor hillbillies. They agree he walloped her; they also agree he did poorly in the first debate. These are educated, professional people that are being objective in their evaluations. I myself started watching the debate thinking this could go downhill quickly and maybe be the end; but amazingly he didn't just turn it around, he won going away.

    Obviously he is far from the best choice, but he is right on the top issues that are critical to our future, and she is dead wrong on them. Beyond that, it is appalling that anyone could support her (especially females) given her personal orchestration in the demonizing and destruction of victims of sexual assault (committed by her husband) in order protect and expand their political ambitions. I am utterly flabbergasted that anyone could support such complicit criminal behavior, especially women.
    Donald Trump has ACTUALLY ASSAULTED WOMEN.
  • friendfromlowry
    QuakerOats;1814678 wrote:The people I have talked to today are not dumb, nor uneducated, nor hillbillies. They agree he walloped her; they also agree he did poorly in the first debate. These are educated, professional people that are being objective in their evaluations. I myself started watching the debate thinking this could go downhill quickly and maybe be the end; but amazingly he didn't just turn it around, he won going away.

    Obviously he is far from the best choice, but he is right on the top issues that are critical to our future, and she is dead wrong on them. Beyond that, it is appalling that anyone could support her (especially females) given her personal orchestration in the demonizing and destruction of victims of sexual assault (committed by her husband) in order protect and expand their political ambitions. I am utterly flabbergasted that anyone could support such complicit criminal behavior, especially women.
    Spock and Belly?
  • friendfromlowry
    like_that;1814652 wrote:Barstool has been running with this, and it brings the lulz.
    My favorite was the vine of Bone Thug's "Thuggish Ruggish Bone"
  • like_that
    http://www.barstoolsports.com/newyork/top-5-most-important-revelations-from-ken-bones-radio-appearance-this-morning/?utm_campaign=SocialflowFB&utm_source=BarstoolFB&utm_medium=Socialflow

    [emoji23]
  • Spock
    HC looks more like a criminal this morning then ever. Trump game plan worked bigly.


    So is Wiki still have a few more document dumps?
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    Spock;1814694 wrote:HC looks more like a criminal this morning then ever. Trump game plan worked bigly.


    So is Wiki still have a few more document dumps?

    Yes, Belly. Wiki still are got some dumps for yet now.
  • like_that
    To answer cc's poorly written question, yes. Wikileaks just dumped 2K more emails from Clinton's campaign team a couple hours ago.
  • Heretic
    like_that;1814697 wrote:To answer cc's poorly written question, yes. Wikileaks just dumped 2K more emails from Clinton's campaign team a couple hours ago.
    So that means that any day now, someone will find footage of Trump saying something horrible just to reinforce that both candidates suck ass!
  • QuakerOats
    Fab4Runner;1814681 wrote:Donald Trump has ACTUALLY ASSAULTED WOMEN.

    oh, ok
  • QuakerOats


    Hilarious.

    Saw another one that said 'uncommitted voter, but committed to JC Penny'.
  • O-Trap
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1814680 wrote:I made a post about how both candidates are bad and both parties messed up and a friend from high school let me know that I was sexist b/c I preferred Bernie or Biden over Clinton and Hillary isn't anymore corrupt than Bernie or Biden, men just don't go after them like they do Hillary.
    Just tell her she's being ageist for preferring the younger Clinton over Bernie.

    Her position is untenable.
    Spock;1814694 wrote:... bigly ...
    I see what you did there.
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1814695 wrote:Yes, Belly. Wiki still are got some dumps for yet now.
    Dead.
  • QuakerOats
    O-Trap;1814679 wrote:Were any of these people voting for Clinton before this debate? If not, I'm not sure I trust this part of your assessment of their reasoning.

    No, they are smart people who care about the direction we are headed. They can be relied upon as objective because they thought he did poorly in the first debate, and he did. If they were in-the-tank surrogates they would not have said he did poorly in the first debate. But it is clear he won the second debate by laying out her decades-long failures as a career politician, pointing out her criminal behavior, and delving in to the facts of her despicable behavior of destroying and threatening victims of abuse ..............not to mention the policy issues that were discussed from obamaKare to the supreme court to taxes etc..etc..
  • sleeper
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1814680 wrote:I was just SJW'd on facebook lol ouch.

    I made a post about how both candidates are bad and both parties messed up and a friend from high school let me know that I was sexist b/c I preferred Bernie or Biden over Clinton and Hillary isn't anymore corrupt than Bernie or Biden, men just don't go after them like they do Hillary.
    You made the mistake of talking about politics on FB. It's a waste of time.
  • sleeper
    QuakerOats;1814708 wrote:No, they are smart people who care about the direction we are headed. They can be relied upon as objective because they thought he did poorly in the first debate, and he did. If they were in-the-tank surrogates they would not have said he did poorly in the first debate. But it is clear he won the second debate by laying out her decades-long failures as a career politician, pointing out her criminal behavior, and delving in to the facts of her despicable behavior of destroying and threatening victims of abuse ..............not to mention the policy issues that were discussed from obamaKare to the supreme court to taxes etc..etc..
    I'm objective too and I think Trump got hammered in both debates.

    Trump is a giant clown.
  • Heretic
    QuakerOats;1814708 wrote:No, they are smart people who care about the direction we are headed. They can be relied upon as objective because they thought he did poorly in the first debate, and he did. If they were in-the-tank surrogates they would not have said he did poorly in the first debate. But it is clear he won the second debate by laying out her decades-long failures as a career politician, pointing out her criminal behavior, and delving in to the facts of her despicable behavior of destroying and threatening victims of abuse ..............not to mention the policy issues that were discussed from obamaKare to the supreme court to taxes etc..etc..
    "They're objective because although they hate one candidate, they did say the other didn't do that great in that one debate!!!!!"

    ALL THE LULZ
  • QuakerOats
    None of them wanted, nor thought, Trump would be the candidate. It is not like some Trump love-fest, rather smart people who watched both debates and had clear, and unanimous, opinions. Hope that assists.
  • CenterBHSFan
    I think the only winner at the debate was ratings. If you were looking for "reality tv" you found it in that debate. I didn't watch it, but I did hear and see blurbs. The one chuckle I had over all of that was:

    Trump: Because you'd be in jail.
    Audience: howls

    On a serious note, from what I heard today, Hillary got flustered. Moreso than she's ever been.
  • queencitybuckeye
    QuakerOats;1814708 wrote:But it is clear he won the second debate by laying out her decades-long failures as a career politician, pointing out her criminal behavior, and delving in to the facts of her despicable behavior of destroying and threatening victims of abuse ..............not to mention the policy issues that were discussed from obamaKare to the supreme court to taxes etc..etc..
    Incorrect. The winner of the debate is measured in votes. Clinton's lead increased after the first debate. That means she won. The "winner" of the second will mean less than the shift from *****-gate.
  • QuakerOats
    I already said Trump did not win the first debate.

    But he clearly won the second debate.
  • Heretic
    queencitybuckeye;1814726 wrote:Incorrect. The winner of the debate is measured in votes. Clinton's lead increased after the first debate. That means she won. The "winner" of the second will mean less than the shift from *****-gate.
    Yeah, anyone can say a candidate won because he/she expressed their thoughts ("He said stuff I've been wanting him to say! HE WON!!!"), but unless those words he said leads to him getting a huge bounce in polls that negates the fall he's taken through the first debate, his "grab dat puss" line and so on, he didn't really win, regardless of how much one wants to believe otherwise. That is logic and will be found out by the end of the week (since it takes a few days for polls to semi-accurately reflect one specific event, such as a debate). Quaker's assessment is all about the feelz.