Archive

Hillary Clinton

  • QuakerOats
    sleeper;1796162 wrote:DOes it really matter? HC is the nominee. Bernie is just a waste of time.
    I sure hope so .....

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/05/18/13-minutes-of-video-that-show-why-hillary-clinton-isnt-unbeatable-in-the-general-election/
  • QuakerOats
    She's down 5 in latest poll. Perhaps overcoming her criminal background will be more challenging than her supporters thought.
  • CenterBHSFan
    QuakerOats;1796314 wrote:She's down 5 in latest poll. Perhaps overcoming her criminal background will be more challenging than her supporters thought.
    I don't think that's it. Trying to quelch Bernie is making her display a stance of "I'm just as left as he is!" which is kinda turning off her more sane, middle of the road, democratic supporters. The average democrat, in my opinion, doesn't want to go THAT far left. But that's what she is doing in order to stay ahead - steal back voters from Bernie.
  • Apple
    Trump has seen a bounce in his favor since becoming the presumptive nominee with Cruz, et al, voters realizing he will be the man facing HRC. It's likely HRC will see a similar bounce once she has gotten the nomination.
  • QuakerOats
    She might, but if you not supporting her because she is a crook, what is going to change that next month.
  • MontyBrunswick
    hillary is by far the most qualified. after the email stuff blows over she will win by 30%
  • gut
    MontyBrunswick;1796504 wrote:hillary is by far the most qualified. after the email stuff blows over she will win by 30%
    Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?

    She has some things in common with Ted Cruz - outspoken but seemingly attempting, much less accomplishing, very little other than to advance her political career.
  • sleeper
    gut;1796506 wrote:Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?

    She has some things in common with Ted Cruz - outspoken but seemingly attempting, much less accomplishing, very little other than to advance her political career.
    he's a troll.
  • MontyBrunswick
    gut;1796506 wrote:Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?
    Decades of experience.
  • BoatShoes
    MontyBrunswick;1796564 wrote:Decades of experience.
    Gut only cares about experience when he can complain about Obama having none.

    Can't believe he's not going to secretly vote for Hillary. She's the only thing close to an establishment Republican left in the race.
  • BoatShoes
    gut;1796506 wrote:Based on what, exactly? Decades of scandal and unremarkable achievement?

    She has some things in common with Ted Cruz - outspoken but seemingly attempting, much less accomplishing, very little other than to advance her political career.
    She passed the State Children's Health Insurance Program with a Republican Congress after being defeated on HillaryCare. The exact sort of thing you claim you would want Obama to do.
  • gut
    BoatShoes;1796577 wrote:She passed the State Children's Health Insurance Program with a Republican Congress after being defeated on HillaryCare. The exact sort of thing you claim you would want Obama to do.
    LMFAO. That's all you got after a career spanning decades? And that was as First Lady - did she do anything as a Senator or Sec State?

    Yeah, she's experienced alright. And based on that experience, we know she is an ineffective leader.
  • superman
    gut;1796582 wrote:LMFAO. That's all you got after a career spanning decades? And that was as First Lady - did she do anything as a Senator or Sec State?

    Yeah, she's experienced alright. And based on that experience, we know she is an ineffective leader.
    She jailed the perpetrator of the Benghazi attack and confiscated his video camera.
  • CenterBHSFan
    Hillary Clinton blasting Trump for pandering to the gun lobby while at a specifically targeted audience of Trayvon Martin Foundation's Circle of Mothers event. $1,500 per plate to attend this event, all donated to the foundation.

    Oh, the irony...

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article79108402.html
    “Unlike Trump I will not pander to the gun lobby,” Clinton said.

    Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article79108402.html#storylink=cpy
  • QuakerOats
    She raked in over $21 million in just the two-year period Apr '13 - Apr '15 from banks and corps in speaking fees.

    Absolutely incredible.

    And on top of that you have the clinton foundation slush fund, laundering tens of millions continuously.

    She is perhaps the most disgusting criminal phony in political history.
  • sleeper
    QuakerOats;1796778 wrote:She raked in over $21 million in just the two-year period Apr '13 - Apr '15 from banks and corps in speaking fees.

    Absolutely incredible.

    And on top of that you have the clinton foundation slush fund, laundering tens of millions continuously.

    She is perhaps the most disgusting criminal phony in political history.
    That's just what they pay!
  • gut
    And supposedly another $26M from Slick Willy in that time frame, meaning they hauled in nearly $50M in two years ahead of the Presidential run.

    But I'm sure people just really wanted to hear what they had to say, and this isn't blatant bribery by any stretch.
  • QuakerOats
    I see one of her partners in crime, Terry Mcauliffe (VA gov.) is now under federal investigation also (as he should be; he is one of the most despicable sob's in politics). They run in a nice crowd; hope they go down in flames soon.
  • SportsAndLady
    Thoughts on the State Departments investigation report released today?

    Anyone starting to think she'll eventually be indicted? Or will she continue to skirt by with no negative action against her?
  • sleeper
    SportsAndLady;1796995 wrote:Thoughts on the State Departments investigation report released today?

    Anyone starting to think she'll eventually be indicted? Or will she continue to skirt by with no negative action against her?
    I doubt anything happens with this. She's probably the most corrupt politician in the country and has the back of wealthy people.
  • SportsAndLady
    sleeper;1796996 wrote:I doubt anything happens with this. She's probably the most corrupt politician in the country and has the back of wealthy people.
    I just love her people's responses. "This is what SoS's did! It's not like she's the first one to do this!

    So fucking what? Still illegal what she was doing. Who cares that her predecessors did the same things? Why does that make it okay?
  • wkfan
    SportsAndLady;1796995 wrote:Anyone starting to think she'll eventually be indicted? Or will she continue to skirt by with no negative action against her?
    This.

    The Clinton's are teflon.
  • QuakerOats
    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/hillary-clinton-personal-email-worry-223559


    She did not cooperate with the IG.

    She did not want personal emails to be seen by State Dept.

    Criminal bitch.