Archive

Hillary Clinton

  • Belly35
    So let Belly break this down...
    what we have here is civil servant above the laws of the land
    this is where career politican believe they are not held accountable to the public and the nation
    now is a period time that our American political system needs a awaking of who politican are .... Civil servants to the American population nothing more.

    crime of treason is justified .....
  • Spock
    LOL, HC must be sweating this Iowa thing. Her campaign is calling a victory with about 20% of the delegates still out.
  • gut
    Spock;1779331 wrote:LOL, HC must be sweating this Iowa thing. Her campaign is calling a victory with about 20% of the delegates still out.
    You gotta interpret the spin....she didn't lose by double digits = win


    Speaking of spin, Chris Christie lowered the bar to "be first among the governors"....and came in 4th.
  • MontyBrunswick
    The president was decided last night
  • Spock
    MontyBrunswick;1779405 wrote:The president was decided last night
    this has me scratching my head. Cause if that was the case, Wouldnt Rick Santorum be prez?
  • majorspark
    Only a complete fool does not know what these outrageous speaking fees paid to politicians are for. They are no longer just a thank you for retiring politicians. Remember Hillary is fighting for the little guy you know. Got a hand it to her its hard to get that many lies packed in just over a minute and a half.

    [video=youtube;sCnwOjgVdog][/video]
  • Spock
    This dem debate in NH is scary.......both of these people are crazy and their policies would kill the US
  • HitsRus
    What was funny was watching her squirm trying to justify getting $650k from Goldman Sachs for speaking fees..... Not because she has to justify it, but because she seemed apologetic and ashamed that she took the money.

    You don't have to apologize, Hilary !
    Not that I like her at all(and after this, even less)....but she is a major political figure that draws interest, people, and money. She was FLOTUS and Sec. Of State.... She doesn't need to be ashamed of people paying her money to speak!
  • QuakerOats
    The idea that the two candidates on the democrat side are in a tit-for-tat over which one is more 'progressive' is testimony to just how far we have fallen (or at least the dems have fallen). Nothing more than a race to the bottom. Wow
  • ZWICK 4 PREZ
    QuakerOats;1780153 wrote:The idea that the two candidates on the democrat side are in a tit-for-tat over which one is more 'progressive' is testimony to just how far we have fallen (or at least the dems have fallen). Nothing more than a race to the bottom. Wow
    What's sad, for you, is one of those two will be the next president
  • QuakerOats
    Sad not so much for me, for the republic.
  • HitsRus
    Truly it is sad if we feel ashamed to admit how much money we make... Or how productive we are.
    Sanders, of course, doesn't gave to feel ashamed at all as he grovels for the government dependent vote.... His net worth ( including his wife) is about $1/2 million.... ridiculously low for a 73 year old man who is a United States senator. This guy, after a lifetime of working, including a senator's salary basically only owns his own house... And nothing more. So unsophisticated in investment, He could have made more on his money if he had just buried it.Yeah , it really wants me to sign up for his economic prescriptions.

    Maybe, if he'd haven't travelled so much to those anti-American rallies with the Sandinistas 30 years ago, he might gave enough to retire on and spare the rest of us his Marxist mantra.
  • Spock
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1780157 wrote:What's sad, for you, is one of those two will be the next president
    so you want someone to take your money, make your education useless by giving it away and to decide whether you get health care late in life......sign yourself up, not me
  • HitsRus
    ^^^no, no you understand... You don't have a choice... Unless you want to abort your irresponsible sexual behavior.
  • like_that
    ZWICK 4 PREZ;1780157 wrote:What's sad, for you, is one of those two will be the next president
    Very debatable, but if happens don't worry, it will be sad for you too.
  • sleeper
    I'm not a Republican but I am a bit nervous if Sanders were to be elected. HC scared me for other reasons but Sanders would ruin this country just as bad as Trump would.
  • QuakerOats
    majorspark;1780025 wrote:Only a complete fool does not know what these outrageous speaking fees paid to politicians are for. They are no longer just a thank you for retiring politicians. Remember Hillary is fighting for the little guy you know. Got a hand it to her its hard to get that many lies packed in just over a minute and a half.

    [video=youtube;sCnwOjgVdog][/video]

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/clinton-speeches-218969
  • jmog
    sleeper;1780194 wrote:I'm not a Republican but I am a bit nervous if Sanders were to be elected. HC scared me for other reasons but Sanders would ruin this country just as bad as Trump would.
    I am hoping for ANYONE but Sanders, Hillary, or Trump. I almost don't care who wins the R nomination as long as it isn't Trump. If Trump and either Hillary/Sanders are the nominees it will truly be the worst 2 candidates in the history of the US.
  • rrfan
    Spock;1780039 wrote:This dem debate in NH is scary.......both of these people are crazy and their policies would kill the US
    Exactly, but a bunch of stupid people will vote D no matter what. Scary.
  • Spock
    HC speaking in NH sounds and looks so bad. She doesn't mean any of that
  • rrfan
    This race is turning out to be a complete mess. Hillary can't talk without lying and Bernie's plans will wreck this country even more than what Obama has done and that is saying a lot. Trump and republican race also a mess.

    I am still more interested in a business man for president than a life long government employee.
  • Heretic
    rrfan;1780666 wrote:Exactly, but a bunch of stupid people will vote D no matter what. Scary.
    Interesting, since you were responding to a very stupid person who, from his posts, votes R.
  • rrfan
    Heretic;1780764 wrote:Interesting, since you were responding to a very stupid person who, from his posts, votes R.
    There are stupid people on both sides the D's have plenty and so do the R's. Stupid does not discriminate.
  • Dr Winston O'Boogie
    rrfan;1780666 wrote:Exactly, but a bunch of stupid people will vote D no matter what. Scary.
    The same can be said of the Republican candidates and voters.