Hillary Clinton

• Ytowngirlinfla

  

  Belly35;1729869 wrote:four dead Americans on her watch and asleep at the switch

  How many dead military members because of Bush's WMD and the invasion of Iraq?
• superman

  Ytowngirlinfla;1729984 wrote:How many dead military members because of Bush's WMD and the invasion of Iraq?

  Liberals bringing up Bush. Shocking.
• Ytowngirlinfla

  

  superman;1729987 wrote:Liberals bringing up Bush. Shocking.

  I'm not even a liberal but if you are going to blame Hilary you might as well blame Bush as well.
• superman

  Ytowngirlinfla;1729989 wrote:I'm not even a liberal but if you are going to blame Hilary you might as well blame Bush as well.

  Liberal refusing to own what they are. Shocking.
• like_that

  

  Ytowngirlinfla;1729989 wrote:I'm not even a liberal but if you are going to blame Hilary you might as well blame Bush as well.

  No you shouldn't, that completely irrelevant and a huge cop out. Bush has no power in this country and never will again. We are talking about a potential POTUS and you want to bring up a former president to deflect. The fact you (or anybody who uses this cop out) have to use bush as a measuring stick for Hillary/Obama says enough about them.
  
  Maybe after 20 years we will stop hearing this cop out response.
• jmog

  Ytowngirlinfla;1729984 wrote:How many dead military members because of Bush's WMD and the invasion of Iraq?

  Please feel free to explain what GW Bush has to do with the next Presidential election. That comment was not only needlessly inflammatory (as in it had nothing to do with the thread topic) but it has no bearing on the next election.
  
  With that in mind...
  
  Mrs. Ytowngirlinfla, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
• gut

  like_that;1730098 wrote:No you shouldn't, that completely irrelevant and a huge cop out.

  You'd think after 6+ years people still wouldn't be lowering the bar with "what about Bush". I mean, what does one accomplish arguing someone sucks less (debatable) than Bush?
  
  So you voted for him/her because they aren't as bad as Bush?!? Well, the country is in good hands.
• QuakerOats

  • "SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL, pictured, a longtime Clinton confidant, reportedly advised then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton two days after the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that an Al Qaeda-tied group had planned the deadly assault and used a protest as cover — but despite this warning, Clinton's UN ambassador went on to publicly claim it was 'spontaneous.'"
    
    
    
    To think that this corrupt, lying, bitch is even in the presidential race discussion is absolutely mind-blowing.
• Belly35

  

  ptown_trojans_1;1729874 wrote:She has been cleared of any misconduct by the R led Congress.
  But, yeah sure blame her.
  
  If we go that rational then every single SEC STATE has had blood on their hands.

  Benghazi Bombshell: Clinton pal told her attack was planned, Al Qaeda-tied
  
  Emails reportedly show confidant told Clinton Benghazi attack planned by AQ-tied fighters
  
  
  SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL, pictured, a longtime Clinton confidant, reportedly advised then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton two days after the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that an Al Qaeda-tied group had planned the deadly assault and used a protest as cover — but despite this warning,
  
  
  Asleep at the switch ..... didn't take her duty serious, politics for profit not for the interest of the Ameican people...
• TedSheckler

  

  jmog;1730130 wrote: Mrs. Ytowngirlinfla, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  A simple "wrong" would have done just fine...
• Apple

  

  Belly35;1730146 wrote:Benghazi Bombshell: Clinton pal told her attack was planned, Al Qaeda-tied
  
  Emails reportedly show confidant told Clinton Benghazi attack planned by AQ-tied fighters
  
  
  SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL, pictured, a longtime Clinton confidant, reportedly advised then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton two days after the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that an Al Qaeda-tied group had planned the deadly assault and used a protest as cover — but despite this warning,
  
  
  Asleep at the switch ..... didn't take her duty serious, politics for profit not for the interest of the Ameican people...

  Looks like Trey Gowdy is on the Blumenthal connection with the Congressional investigation.
  
  http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-foundation-silent-on-blumenthals-exit-date/
• gut

  How are Democrats not getting nervous? Hillary isn't quite as teflon as Slick Willy, and the Republican nominee is going to have plenty to attack Clinton on with honesty and transparency.
  
  Then again, maybe the liberal media will fall in line and this is all just an effort to later dismiss it as "old news" and "no there there".
• like_that

  

  gut;1730310 wrote:How are Democrats not getting nervous? Hillary isn't quite as teflon as Slick Willy, and the Republican nominee is going to have plenty to attack Clinton on with honesty and transparency.
  
  Then again, maybe the liberal media will fall in line and this is all just an effort to later dismiss it as "old news" and "no there there".

  They will definitely dismiss it as old news while also still bringing up Bush [emoji23].
• QuakerOats

  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/22/clinton-foundation-reveals-up-to-264m-in-previously-undisclosed-payments/
  
  
  Tried to hide another $26 million. Corrupt, lying, bastards........
• cruiser_96

  

  Once again the myth of a "Liberal Media Bias" is exposed for the joke (and lie) that it is! The Clintons are now victims of a vicious group of activists weilding the pen - er, computer. For shame.
• gut

  cruiser_96;1730410 wrote:Once again the myth of a "Liberal Media Bias" is exposed for the joke (and lie) that it is!

  LMAO, they don't even try to hide it any more. Just because the media may not be as liberal as you doesn't mean they aren't biased.
• wkfan

  http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2015/05/22/us--dem-2016-clinton-emails.html
  
  HRC received classified emails on her private email......
  
  All the more reason to force her to turn ALL e-mails over the DOJ.
  
  Does anyone still think the reason that she had used a private email for SOS mail was so that she did not have to carry two cell phones?
• cruiser_96

  

  gut;1730454 wrote:LMAO, they don't even try to hide it any more. Just because the media may not be as liberal as you doesn't mean they aren't biased.

  Hey! I'm not a liberal. I prefer "Communist"!
• cruiser_96

  

  wkfan;1730465 wrote:http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2015/05/22/us--dem-2016-clinton-emails.html
  
  HRC received classified emails on her private email......
  
  All the more reason to force her to turn ALL e-mails over the DOJ.
  
  Does anyone still think the reason that she had used a private email for SOS mail was so that she did not have to carry two cell phones?

  Do you honestly believe that the very people who would vote for her care? #BlindAllegience
• gut

  wkfan;1730465 wrote:http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/apexchange/2015/05/22/us--dem-2016-clinton-emails.html
  
  HRC received classified emails on her private email......
  
  All the more reason to force her to turn ALL e-mails over the DOJ.
  
  Does anyone still think the reason that she had used a private email for SOS mail was so that she did not have to carry two cell phones?

  I think it's funny watching her call for the release of her emails as some sort of commitment to transparency....you know, the emails that her group already screened before turning over to the DOJ.
  
  I've only seen it mentioned in passing, but I'm quite concerned her ability as POTUS could be compromised if the Russians, Chinese or anyone else has incriminating emails of hers. Knowing Clinton, there's definitely some shady stuff...and it's something more than "unlikely" she was hacked.
• Classyposter58

  

  Yeah she's screwed
  
  
  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
• DeyDurkie5

  

  Shut it down, classy has spoken
• Footwedge

  like_that;1730098 wrote:No you shouldn't, that completely irrelevant and a huge cop out. Bush has no power in this country and never will again. We are talking about a potential POTUS and you want to bring up a former president to deflect. The fact you (or anybody who uses this cop out) have to use bush as a measuring stick for Hillary/Obama says enough about them.
  
  Maybe after 20 years we will stop hearing this cop out response.

  Yes it is irrelevant if sticking to the context of this thread. But you bet your sweet ass it's relevant to the big picture if one wants to rationally discuss dead Americans because of bad policy.
• Footwedge

  jmog;1730130 wrote:Please feel free to explain what GW Bush has to do with the next Presidential election. That comment was not only needlessly inflammatory (as in it had nothing to do with the thread topic) but it has no bearing on the next election.
  
  With that in mind...
  
  Mrs. Ytowngirlinfla, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

  Irrelevant to the thread ..agreed. People being dumber for reading it? Hardly. How many Americans still give Bush a free pass for the loss of American soldiers over a pack of lies? What's really amazing is all the ass clowns like you that...after all that is now known as fact...still justify the criminal invasion in Iraq. Beyond pathetic....and a truly sorry commentary on how partisan hacks use tunnel vision glasses.
• HitsRus

  

  Charles Krauthammer has a great article today that is particularly relevant to this discussion. You can argue whether the war was a mistake, based on a false premise, or was too costly in American lives....but Bush handed off to Obama a victory. what has transpired since is even worse, because it has negated what we paid so dearly for......and that is entirely related to the next election, and those responsible for it.
  http://www.omaha.com/opinion/charles-krauthammer-there-s-no-question-who-authored-latest-iraq/article_3ed7e855-cc97-54ec-abd5-fbe47c17cb8b.html