Archive

Disgusted with kasich administration - Part III

  • Bigdogg
    jmog;1450235 wrote:Did you fail math or statistics? Your own site that you posted a link to says EXACTLY what he typed.
    Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
  • pmoney25
    Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.

    Ummm. Maybe I can't read but under the column that says 2012 rank. Ohio is 13.
  • majorspark
    Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
    I'm laughing my ass off. Are you seriously this dense? Or just a liar. Dude we all make mistakes credible people own up to them.
    elbuckeye28;1449697 wrote:Ohio ranked 13th last year.
    elbuckeye28;1449697 wrote:if you pull up the 12 month moving average, which would be give a clearer picture of the long-term trend, Ohio is 34th.
  • majorspark
    pmoney25;1450457 wrote:Ummm. Maybe I can't read but under the column that says 2012 rank. Ohio is 13.
    You like the rest of us can read.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    I can confirm. The link posted says Ohio is 13th.
  • HitsRus
    ...LOL These last posts show that you just can't throw *** against the wall and expect not to get called on it. The people on here are thoughtful and critical...and read links.
  • bases_loaded
    To be fair. Maybe biggdog was subtracting 13 from the number of Obama states(60) to get his adjusted number of 47.
  • fish82
    This thread took a pretty amusing turn. :laugh:
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    fish82;1450557 wrote:This thread took a pretty amusing turn. :laugh:
    Never argue with a stupid person. First they'll drag you down to their level, then they will beat you with experience.
  • majorspark
    Manhattan Buckeye;1450617 wrote:Never argue with a stupid person. First they'll drag you down to their level, then they will beat you with experience.
    LOL
  • Abe Vigoda
    You can changes filters to fit what you want. Bigdogg is correct in what he said. Total private 12 month average, April 2013 , Ohio ranks 34th. It is what it is, Kasich is not doing his job. To take shots at him makes you all look silly. His record is his record.
  • gut
    What cracks me up is the libs on here are ripping Kasich for doing a better job than Obama. But on Obama they are crickets...
  • Bigdogg
    You guys are idiots if you cant understand what I said. Not my problems but very entertaining.
  • gut
    Bigdogg;1450859 wrote:You are an idiot. Read what I said.
    I think it's fairly well established that others are not reading what you think you're saying.

    I read what you said. And even though you are wrong, it still doesn't change the fact that you are holding Kasich to a much higher standard than Dear Leader.
  • Bigdogg
  • Bigdogg
    http://wpcarey.asu.edu/bluechip/jobgrowth/secure_states.cfm
  • Bigdogg
    Sorry, not sure why you want to dispute it. If you put in the variables you get what I say. It's not worth arguing with a bunch of idiots who obviously have no clue of what they are talking about. Stay in your bubble.
  • gut
    Bigdogg;1450880 wrote:Sorry, not sure why you want to dispute it. If you put in the variables you get what I say. It's not worth arguing with a bunch of idiots who obviously have no clue of what they are talking about. Stay in your bubble.
    Typical response from a liberal. Completely void of intelligence.

    I know smart people who are liberals. Sadly, I know no liberals who are smart people.
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    "
    Ohio 46 0.09 13 1.73 4.70 5,174.80 5,170.10
  • Manhattan Buckeye
    The 13 is the column of 2012 (last year) rank.

    I have no idea why BigDogg and Abe Vigoda can't read, but I guess this bunch of idiots is too dense for them.
  • HitsRus
    [INDENT]What cracks me up is the libs on here are ripping Kasich for doing a better job than Obama. But on Obama they are crickets... [/INDENT]
    It becomes even more laughable when you plug in the years for Strickland's term, in which the 'rank' was nearly 40+ across his entire term. I think there was a 38 in there.;)
  • jmog
    Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
    I have a B.S degree in applied mathematics as well as 2 degrees in chemical engineering.

    I assure you, I did not fail math.
  • gut
    jmog;1451403 wrote:I have a B.S degree in applied mathematics as well as 2 degrees in chemical engineering.

    I assure you, I did not fail math.
    Yeah, but I'll bet you've never taken LIBERAL math.
  • believer
    gut;1451404 wrote:Yeah, but I'll bet you've never taken LIBERAL math.
    It's really simple. I figured it out a long time ago.

    For example, if Democrats demand a 7% tax increase to fund more wealth redistribution, but the Rhino Repubs only agree to a 4% increase, the Congressional Dems howl from the mountaintops that the Repubs cut spending by 3%. Then the leftist MSM reports it as fact.
  • elbuckeye28
    Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
    As others have stated, the data was right in the link. The way you presented the data was problematic. You picked the more volatile statistic and ignored the statistic that better explains the trend while also ignoring the previous year's data that does not support your beliefs. It was pure data dredging and confirmation bias.