Return of the War Party?--Pat Buchanan

• isadore

  dwccrew;984499 wrote:I may not have personal sympathy with anyone from the middle east. I pay taxes so that we can continue bombing them. Kill the regimes. So what if we get many civilians in the crossfire,as long as we get the regime.
  
  Iran and their nuclear program must pay for what they did on 9/11. That was Iran, right? I am confused because they all look the same. Just kill them all!

  whatever works for you with your immodest proposal.
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984508 wrote:whatever works for you with your immodest proposal.

  So now you sympathize with the terrorists?
• I Wear Pants

  I say we prop up more regimes (like we did with the Shah in Iran, Hussein when he was fighting Iran, and the Afghans when they fought the Russians) just so that we have more regimes to kill later on. Don't want to run out of reasons to spend our tax money on bombs and to get our soldiers killed.
• isadore

  I Wear Pants;984506 wrote:No the difference is Osama Bin Laden attacked us when we were not occupying his country and when we weren't killing anyone over there. And he attacked civilians. That's why he was and will forever be viewed as an evil guy.
  
  The difference is now there is not an organized network like Al-Quada that is capable of the same type of attacks. And then there's the whole Iraq thing where they didn't attack us at all.
  
  But that doesn't matter, they are filthy Muslims and must die!
  
  On a serious note, perhaps we should have a forum rule that trolls must at least be entertaining to not get banned.

  I am looking forward to meeting you. shame, shame, shame trying to get someone banned, you did it once already. So all the other killers of Americans beside al queda are ok with you, they are not bad guys, they had no choice but to use those ieds and suicide bombers to kill Americans. Well I prefer they are all droned and die. I know for you that would be a victory for American imperialism but they are scum no matter how you say they are not "bad guys." Americans killed stopping al queda from re establishing itself in afghanistan today, killed by people you see as not "bad guys."
• isadore

  I Wear Pants;984511 wrote:I say we prop up more regimes (like we did with the Shah in Iran, Hussein when he was fighting Iran, and the Afghans when they fought the Russians) just so that we have more regimes to kill later on. Don't want to run out of reasons to spend our tax money on bombs and to get our soldiers killed.

  American soldiers killed by repressive Taliban scum, who you consider to be not 'bad guys."
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984520 wrote:I am looking forward to meeting you. shame, shame, shame trying to get someone banned, you did it once already. So all the other killers of Americans beside al queda are ok with you, they are not bad guys, they had no choice but to use those ieds and suicide bombers to kill Americans. Well I prefer they are all droned and die. I know for you that would be a victory for American imperialism but they are scum no matter how you say they are not "bad guys." Americans killed stopping al queda from re establishing itself in afghanistan today, killed by people you see as not "bad guys."

  It's sad that you cheer for more American soldiers to die. Why do you love watching Americans die?
• I Wear Pants

  Isadore would likely choose to kill 1 terrorist even if it cost 1000 US soldier lives.
  
  Because we have to kill the terrorists. US soldiers lives don't matter as long as we kill the terrorists.
• isadore

  dwccrew;984510 wrote:So now you sympathize with the terrorists?

  no
• isadore

  dwccrew;984523 wrote:It's sad that you cheer for more American soldiers to die. Why do you love watching Americans die?

  no
• isadore

  I Wear Pants;984526 wrote:Isadore would likely choose to kill 1 terrorist even if it cost 1000 US soldier lives.
  
  Because we have to kill the terrorists. US soldiers lives don't matter as long as we kill the terrorists.

  from a man who considers the killers of American troops not to "bad guys." who finds these killers of our troops to be heroic. My personal hope they all be droned to death and rot in hell even if you find them heroic.
• LJ

  

  Moving on
• I Wear Pants

  isadore;984536 wrote:from a man who considers the killers of American troops not to "bad guys." who finds these killers of our troops to be heroic. My personal hope they all be droned to death and rot in hell even if you find them heroic.

  verb (used without object) 1. to make a dull, continued, low, monotonous sound; hum; buzz.
  
  
  2. to speak in a monotonous tone.
  
  3. to proceed in a dull, monotonous manner (usually followed by on ): The meeting droned on for hours.
  
  [video=youtube;G2y8Sx4B2Sk][/video]
• isadore

  truth droning on
  "‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ edmund burke
• Cleveland Buck

  

  I Wear Pants;984511 wrote:I say we prop up more regimes (like we did with the Shah in Iran, Hussein when he was fighting Iran, and the Afghans when they fought the Russians) just so that we have more regimes to kill later on. Don't want to run out of reasons to spend our tax money on bombs and to get our soldiers killed.

  Why bother? We should just round up every human being with a towel on his or her head. We could keep them in work camps. Or gas chambers.