Return of the War Party?--Pat Buchanan

• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984430 wrote:I am sorry that you have this great sympathy for people who wish to kill Americans. Its a free country, you can say what you want, even sympathy for the devils who wish to kill us.

  I am sorry that you have this great sympathy for people who wish to kill Americans. Its a free country, you can say what you want, even sympathy for the devils who wish to kill us.
• isadore

  dwccrew;984428 wrote:I didn't say I disapprove, I was asking you if we should bomb some more? I think we should. It's the only way to get them to accept democracy.

  I realize that your heart might bleed for these folks but I find drone technology and useage about the best use of my tax dollars. Kills scum without a direct threat to American lives.
• I Wear Pants

  isadore;984423 wrote:You can not step away from your hatred for this country. Your sorry we went into Afghanistan, overthrew a regime that provided a base for Al queda. Sorry if we went in and stopped them from oppressing women and minorities, sorry if we stopped them from protecting Osama bin laden.
  Here is where your sympathies lay
  "So we have the right to just run roughshod over anyone and they are automatically the bad guys for using gorilla/brutal tactics that are their only real way to fight."
  with the scum that kills Americans. They should all rot in Hell. Despite what you say they are the bad guys. Not who you label as evil the American troops who fight their terrorism and oppression.

  It's sad that you want American soldiers to get killed in wars that do not benefit our country. Too bad you feel that they are fodder for your meaningless wars.
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984437 wrote:I realize that your heart might bleed for these folks but I find drone technology and useage about the best use of my tax dollars. Kills scum without a direct threat to American lives.

  I am sorry that you have this great sympathy for people who wish to kill Americans. Its a free country, you can say what you want, even sympathy for the devils who wish to kill us.
• isadore

  dwccrew;984433 wrote:I am sorry that you have this great sympathy for people who wish to kill Americans. Its a free country, you can say what you want, even sympathy for the devils who wish to kill us.

  that is the most intelligent statement I have ever read of yours, the true comment of an enlightened mind. Terrorists need killing, and if it takes more bombs, please increase my taxes for that purpose.
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984446 wrote:that is the most intelligent statement I have ever read of yours, the true comment of an enlightened mind. Terrorists need killing, and if it takes more bombs, please increase my taxes for that purpose.

  Gosh a ruddies, I've only said that in 3 or 4 posts. Obviously you don't have the mental capacity to understand that. I mean I clearly stated that I believe we need to continue bombing these people so they will eventually be our friends and not our enemies. Just keep killing them until the come around and accept our way of life and democracy. How is that any different than what you said? Gosh a ruddies
• isadore

  I Wear Pants;984443 wrote:It's sad that you want American soldiers to get killed in wars that do not benefit our country. Too bad you feel that they are fodder for your meaningless wars.

  Denying Al Queda a base to repeat their slaughter of 3000 Americans is hardly of no benefit to America or "meaningless." But you, as you wrote, would not want to insult the Taliban by calling them "bad guys" for using "gorilla\brutal tactics" like executing prisoners, mutilating women, roadside ied and suicide bombers used against civilians and our troops. According to you they are just fighting evil imperialist.
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984456 wrote:Denying Al Queda a base to repeat their slaughter of 3000 Americans is hardly of no benefit to America or "meaningless." But you, as you wrote, would not want to insult the Taliban by calling them "bad guys" for using "gorilla\brutal tactics" like executing prisoners, mutilating women, roadside ied and suicide bombers used against civilians and our troops. According to you they are just fighting evil imperialist.

  I realize that your heart might bleed for these folks but I find drone technology and useage about the best use of my tax dollars. Kills scum without a direct threat to American lives.
• I Wear Pants

  isadore;984456 wrote:Denying Al Queda a base to repeat their slaughter of 3000 Americans is hardly of no benefit to America or "meaningless." But you, as you wrote, would not want to insult the Taliban by calling them "bad guys" for using "gorilla\brutal tactics" like executing prisoners, mutilating women, roadside ied and suicide bombers used against civilians and our troops. According to you they are just fighting evil imperialist.

  No no no, you're right, we definitely need to send more troops to be killed. And buy more bombs too because we don't really need that money for anything else and it's not like a strong economy would be good for America anyway. More bombs, more dead soldiers, that's the road to America prosperity. Don't know how I didn't see it.
• dwccrew

  

  I Wear Pants;984463 wrote:No no no, you're right, we definitely need to send more troops to be killed. And buy more bombs too because we don't really need that money for anything else and it's not like a strong economy would be good for America anyway. More bombs, more dead soldiers, that's the road to America prosperity. Don't know how I didn't see it.

  Your heart bleeds for these people that kill Americans. It's ok, it is your choice.
• isadore

  dwccrew;984451 wrote:Gosh a ruddies, I've only said that in 3 or 4 posts. Obviously you don't have the mental capacity to understand that. I mean I clearly stated that I believe we need to continue bombing these people so they will eventually be our friends and not our enemies. Just keep killing them until the come around and accept our way of life and democracy. How is that any different than what you said? Gosh a ruddies

  to copy is of course the sincerest form of flattery, so I am deeply appreciative of the use of one on my favorite phrases. Your little twin claimed I got it from Sarah Palin, so as you read my statements I hope you picture her writing them. Insincerity on the other hand is hardly a positive trait. While I have no problem with the continuing bombing of this evil scum, your earlier comments on several threads would show that your statement quoted above is hardly reflective of your true opinion. You have repeatedly expressed opinions very negative toward America's efforts to defeat terrorism. Personally I hope a bomb is killing some terrorists as I type.
• isadore

  I Wear Pants;984463 wrote:No no no, you're right, we definitely need to send more troops to be killed. And buy more bombs too because we don't really need that money for anything else and it's not like a strong economy would be good for America anyway. More bombs, more dead soldiers, that's the road to America prosperity. Don't know how I didn't see it.

  Obviously why you disapprove of our actions is that you do not see taliban and al queda as bad guys. No for you 9/11 was a justified action against American imperialism. Just another 3000 dead little Eichman's. How dare we overthrow the taliban regime, they were just applying Sharia law and providing shelter to an oppressed group of non bad guy muslims, al queda.
• I Wear Pants

  isadore;984477 wrote:Obviously why you disapprove of our actions is that you do not see taliban and al queda as bad guys. No for you 9/1 was a justified action against American imperialism. Just another 3000 dead little Eichman's. How dare we overthrow the taliban regime, they were just applying Sharia law and providing shelter to an oppressed group of non bad guy muslims, al queda.

  We should just kill all the Muslims. More dead Muslims the safer and better America will be.
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984470 wrote:to copy is of course the sincerest form of flattery, so I am deeply appreciative of the use of one on my favorite phrases. Your little twin claimed I got it from Sarah Palin, so as you read my statements I hope you picture her writing them. Insincerity on the other hand is hardly a positive trait. While I have no problem with the continuing bombing of this evil scum, your earlier comments on several threads would show that your statement quoted above is hardly reflective of your true opinion. You have repeatedly expressed opinions very negative toward America's efforts to defeat terrorism. Personally I hope a bomb is killing some terrorists as I type.

  
  

  isadore;984477 wrote:Obviously why you disapprove of our actions is that you do not see taliban and al queda as bad guys. No for you 9/1 was a justified action against American imperialism. Just another 3000 dead little Eichman's. How dare we overthrow the taliban regime, they were just applying Sharia law and providing shelter to an oppressed group of non bad guy muslims, al queda.

  I approve of what happened on 9/1. But as for 9/11, we must kill everyone, even those that weren't involved at all like Iraqis and now hopefully some Iranians.
• dwccrew

  

  I Wear Pants;984480 wrote:We should just kill all the Muslims. More dead Muslims the safer and better America will be.

  Now you get it. Eventually they will love us. We must use the same philosophy as the Brits did against the Scots many centuries ago.
• I Wear Pants

  William Wallace that scumbag terrorist.
• isadore

  I Wear Pants;984480 wrote:We should just kill all the Muslims. More dead Muslims the safer and better America will be.

  I know from your previous statements that you do not consider terrorists "bad guys and that you find their tactics justied to use against American imperialists like our troops and eichmanesque civiliam population. As opposed to you I very much approve of our drone program blowing up what you consider to be "non bad guy" terrorists before they can kill American troops or civilians.
• isadore

  dwccrew;984481 wrote:
  
  
  
  I approve of what happened on 9/1. But as for 9/11, we must kill everyone, even those that weren't involved at all like Iraqis and now hopefully some Iranians.

  While I realize you may have a personal sympathy with the Iranian regime, I cannot say I am at all sorry to hear of the killing of members of it nuclear program or Quds that have killed Americans.
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984486 wrote:"non bad guy" terrorists before they can kill American troops or civilians.

  How can you say they terrorists are non bad guys? It is Americans like you that piss me off. While we have soldiers over there protecting our freedoms you call the ones that try to kill them, non bad guys.
• I Wear Pants

  Define "terrorist" for us. Is it everyone in Afghanistan? Iraq? Iran? All Muslims?
  
  Who all should we kill oh great moral adjudicator?
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984493 wrote:While I realize you may have a personal sympathy with the Iranian regime, I cannot say I am at all sorry to hear of the killing of members of it nuclear program or Quds that have killed Americans.

  I may not have personal sympathy with anyone from the middle east. I pay taxes so that we can continue bombing them. Kill the regimes. So what if we get many civilians in the crossfire,as long as we get the regime.
  
  Iran and their nuclear program must pay for what they did on 9/11. That was Iran, right? I am confused because they all look the same. Just kill them all!
• isadore

  dwccrew;984482 wrote:Now you get it. Eventually they will love us. We must use the same philosophy as the Brits did against the Scots many centuries ago.

  Wow, I am glad you learn your history of 13th and 14th century Great Britain from Braveheart. But I find what America is trying to do giving people freedom to rule themselves with the supposed oppressive acts of Edward I. For you there is no difference between William Wallace and Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar.
• dwccrew

  

  I Wear Pants;984497 wrote:Define "terrorist" for us. Is it everyone in Afghanistan? Iraq? Iran? All Muslims?
  
  Who all should we kill oh great moral adjudicator?

  Don't you get it? Iran and their uranium enrichment program are to blame for 9/11/01. They must be killed!!!!
• dwccrew

  

  isadore;984501 wrote:Wow, I am glad you learn your history of 13th and 14th century Great Britain from Braveheart. But I find what America is trying to do giving people freedom to rule themselves with the supposed oppressive acts of Edward I. For you there is no difference between William Wallace and Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar.

  Pretty common knowledge that the Brits were imperialists and terrorized everyone they could, including the entire island that their country is a part of.
  
  I find America giving people the freedom to rule themselves by dropping bombs on them the answer too! Not imperialistic at all to impose our way of life on anyone. They've been begging us for years to free them. The signs were there, like when they'd burn the US flag. They really love us now.
• I Wear Pants

  isadore;984501 wrote:Wow, I am glad you learn your history of 13th and 14th century Great Britain from Braveheart. But I find what America is trying to do giving people freedom to rule themselves with the supposed oppressive acts of Edward I. For you there is no difference between William Wallace and Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar.

  No the difference is Osama Bin Laden attacked us when we were not occupying his country and when we weren't killing anyone over there. And he attacked civilians. That's why he was and will forever be viewed as an evil guy.
  
  The difference is now there is not an organized network like Al-Quada that is capable of the same type of attacks. And then there's the whole Iraq thing where they didn't attack us at all.
  
  But that doesn't matter, they are filthy Muslims and must die!
  
  On a serious note, perhaps we should have a forum rule that trolls must at least be entertaining to not get banned.