gut
Senior Member
gut
Senior Member
posted by ernest_t_bassDid not see this anywhere. Anywhere. Don't do that.
No, it was implied. And, yes, I will call that.
posted by ernest_t_bassDid not see this anywhere. Anywhere. Don't do that.
No, it was implied. And, yes, I will call that.
Irrelevant to Biden administration but anyone see Gibbons and Mandel nearly throw down tonight at a forum. What a bunch of tools.
posted by MontyBrunswick
OK, Hal.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Again, it's funny you pick Greenwald as I'm sure you would have roasted him some years ago as a Marxist.
And I'm sure you would have massaged his balls some years ago as a liberal.
He's an actual journalist. Unlike most of the hacks you're reading in NYT and WaPo.
posted by gutNo, it was implied. And, yes, I will call that.
It was not implied. Your own perceptions don't equal reality or implication.
posted by friendfromlowryIrrelevant to Biden administration but anyone see Gibbons and Mandel nearly throw down tonight at a forum. What a bunch of tools.
I saw a still shot on twitter that someone posted for a caption contest, but didn't know the context or see any video. I don't know anything about Gibbons, but Mandel is an absolute moron.
posted by justincredibleI saw a still shot on twitter that someone posted for a caption contest, but didn't know the context or see any video. I don't know anything about Gibbons, but Mandel is an absolute moron.
Trumpkin vs Trumpkin. Both idiots.
posted by gutAnd I'm sure you would have massaged his balls some years ago as a liberal.
He's an actual journalist. Unlike most of the hacks you're reading in NYT and WaPo.
Nope. Never been a fan and he is in no way an actual journalist. He has always written with an anti American slant.
posted by queencitybuckeyeTrumpkin vs Trumpkin. Both idiots.
Well, one of them is very likely our next Senator. Awesome.
posted by justincredibleI saw a still shot on twitter that someone posted for a caption contest, but didn't know the context or see any video. I don't know anything about Gibbons, but Mandel is an absolute moron.
From seeing a commercial or two that Gibbons has put out, he's seems like a QO/CC candidate. In other words, they're word salad where he tries to throw in as many right-wing buzzwords and dog whistles as humanly possible in his 15-30 second spots with no regard as to whether anything resembling a coherent statement is being made.
posted by justincredibleI saw a still shot on twitter that someone posted for a caption contest, but didn't know the context or see any video. I don't know anything about Gibbons, but Mandel is an absolute moron.
What Nancy & Co have brought to the right, Trump has brought to the left - assholes of the Marjorie Greene level that seek only to placate angry white old men.
Bring it on. Love the South African deaf interpreter.
posted by majorsparkBring it on. Love the South African deaf interpreter.
All those people fight like pussies
Most politicians are.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Nope. Never been a fan and he is in no way an actual journalist. He has always written with an anti American slant.
Given our representatives on the world stage I'm not sure I'd fault him.
posted by ernest_t_bassIt was not implied. Your own perceptions don't equal reality or implication.
One last time. What teachers pay in vs. what they get out is significantly more than the return non-teachers get out of SS. 100% fact.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Nope. Never been a fan and he is in no way an actual journalist. He has always written with an anti American slant.
Being pro-liberty is not the same as anti-American. His stuff on Snowden and abuses of the Patriotic act absolutely was quality journalism. That he doesn't write fluff articles doesn't make him anti-American, just a critic.
Like I said, no more of a hack than any other journalist.
posted by gutLike I said, no more of a hack than any other journalist.
There are no longer “journalists”. Just bipartisan hacks. Maybe a handful of real ones, not employed by any of the major networks. An absolute trash profession, but it pays $$.
posted by iclfan2There are no longer “journalists”. Just bipartisan hacks. Maybe a handful of real ones, not employed by any of the major networks. An absolute trash profession, but it pays $$.
Not sure it pays all that well, LOL. There are still a few out there, but you almost have to go independent. The editorial boards at NYT and WaPo kill just about every story that is damaging to the progressive agenda.
Countless examples the past 5-6 years of fake stories getting widespread coverage, and legitimate stories getting killed. The media has become so unreliable how do you even fact-check or determine what should be flagged as fake news? Not nearly enough "journalists" doing their own independent verification
posted by gutBeing pro-liberty is not the same as anti-American. His stuff on Snowden and abuses of the Patriotic act absolutely was quality journalism. That he doesn't write fluff articles doesn't make him anti-American, just a critic.
Like I said, no more of a hack than any other journalist.
That is a very rosey way of thinking about his writing.
posted by gutNot sure it pays all that well, LOL. There are still a few out there, but you almost have to go independent. The editorial boards at NYT and WaPo kill just about every story that is damaging to the progressive agenda.
Countless examples the past 5-6 years of fake stories getting widespread coverage, and legitimate stories getting killed. The media has become so unreliable how do you even fact-check or determine what should be flagged as fake news? Not nearly enough "journalists" doing their own independent verification
There are some out there, but they are rare. I'll also add the gutting of local news has hurt journalism. Your local paper is a shell of itself.
posted by ptown_trojans_1There are some out there, but they are rare. I'll also add the gutting of local news has hurt journalism. Your local paper is a shell of itself.
Facts. Unless the story has receipts, I don’t even entertain it. It’s hilarious when for a few days people run with a story that cites “sources” and end up being wrong every time.
posted by ptown_trojans_1That is a very rosey way of thinking about his writing.
I mean, he won awards for the stories I mentioned. I don't agree with all his stuff, but I find his articles to usually be pretty well sourced and to hold up.
If you're saying his many criticisms of our govt makes him anti-American, I'm going to strongly disagree.
posted by iclfan2Facts. Unless the story has receipts, I don’t even entertain it. It’s hilarious when for a few days people run with a story that cites “sources” and end up being wrong every time.
It used to be real facts and legit stories were acknowledged by "the other side" even if it took 2-3 days. Anything that you couldn't find conceded in both left and right wing sources was suspect.
But that all changed with Trump. From Russian Collusion to Hunter Biden, the leftwing media has straight up stopped any pretense of objectivity or journalism.
Profound.