Youngstown needs a new conference

• Al Bundy

  Paladin wrote: Who's whining ?? I'm suggesting that publics long ago realized it was their "BEST INTERESTS" not to be in a league with a parochial(S) . If the parochial REALLY wanted a league, I have suggested a VIABLE means of doing so. But if this is simply a discussion of dissing on publics, move on. The BEST INTEREST decision on that has already been made. I'll respect your BEST INTEREST decision as long as you respect the public's BEST INTEREST decision. Fair ?? You feel free to make your kids decision and let the public schools make their decisions for their kids.
  
  P.S. -- not from South Range , but thanks for playing.

  Boardman and Fitch left the SVC to play public schools and soften up their schedule. Has that made their programs better? Fitch and Boardman both had better programs year in and year out when they were in the SVC and played better opponents week in and week out.
• gyea36

  JFK "plays up" in many games each year. Hubbard, Howland, University School, Elyria Catholic, Wheeling Central Catholic, Clairton (PA), and others. And JFK would welcome other chances to "play up" from schools where the disparity isn't as great such as Lakeview, Niles, etc. These teams offer a competitive match up. We aren't asking for games vs Matthews, Southington, etc. and we're not asking for games against Harding, Mooney, Ursuline etc. Makes alot of sense to me to play games within a window of competition that is reasonable, some a bit better and maybe some a little bit worse varying from year to year, but no huge disparity. And JFK being in a league with local public schools would help JFK, but it would also help the local public schools...just like Delphos St John helps other teams in the vaunted MAC conference like Delphos Jefferson, Maria Stein Marion Local, Coldwater, St Henry, etc.
• ytownfootball

  

  Liberty? Seriously....Liberty?
  
  The fact is Liberty doesn't have the depth to be able to stay healthy more than three games into that league.
  
  It's not that they couldn't be competive at times, they could, but hardly on a consistent basis. The last thing on the administrations list would to be the whipping boy for the largest schools in the area.
• mlisi39

  september63 wrote: Not a bad idea..........but will the parochial schools be OK with this conference?

  Yes. Why wouldn't they?
  
  Anything to make scheduling easier and less traveling. Everyone in this area is always clamoring for more local matchups. Did you SEE how many people were there for Mooney-Poland? Every school involved would see huge increases in revenue from the gate alone.
  
  The problem is that old grudges die hard... if they ever die at all.
• Mooney44Cards

  

  ytownfootball wrote: Liberty? Seriously....Liberty?
  
  The fact is Liberty doesn't have the depth to be able to stay healthy more than three games into that league.
  
  It's not that they couldn't be competive at times, they could, but hardly on a consistent basis. The last thing on the administrations list would to be the whipping boy for the largest schools in the area.

  Haha I really wanted to put Poland in there but just said Liberty too because I know that Poland would be the last out of those schools listed to ever agree to something like that.
  
  The question is, would the kids rather be one and done in the playoffs, or play a couple of huge local matchups in the regular season? Again we have adults making decisions based on what they think is the "best interest" of the kids, but when you actually talk to area players, they'd much rather lose to a team like Ursuline in a huge regular season game than lose in a playoff game to some distant po-dunk school no ones ever heard of.
• Al Bundy

  Mooney44Cards wrote:

  ytownfootball wrote: Liberty? Seriously....Liberty?
  
  The fact is Liberty doesn't have the depth to be able to stay healthy more than three games into that league.
  
  It's not that they couldn't be competive at times, they could, but hardly on a consistent basis. The last thing on the administrations list would to be the whipping boy for the largest schools in the area.

  Haha I really wanted to put Poland in there but just said Liberty too because I know that Poland would be the last out of those schools listed to ever agree to something like that.
  
  The question is, would the kids rather be one and done in the playoffs, or play a couple of huge local matchups in the regular season? Again we have adults making decisions based on what they think is the "best interest" of the kids, but when you actually talk to area players, they'd much rather lose to a team like Ursuline in a huge regular season game than lose in a playoff game to some distant po-dunk school no ones ever heard of.

  I know it isn't Youngstown area, but I'd like to see Big Red where you have Poland/Liberty. I respect Liberty's program, but I think they would have a tough time in that league in most years. They had a great team for 2 years (about 4-5 years ago), and they beat Ursuline in the playoffs and gave Mooney a great battle, I just don't think they could compete with all of those teams in most years.
• ytownfootball

  

  Mooney44Cards wrote:

  ytownfootball wrote: Liberty? Seriously....Liberty?
  
  The fact is Liberty doesn't have the depth to be able to stay healthy more than three games into that league.
  
  It's not that they couldn't be competive at times, they could, but hardly on a consistent basis. The last thing on the administrations list would to be the whipping boy for the largest schools in the area.

  
  
  The question is, would the kids rather be one and done in the playoffs, or play a couple of huge local matchups in the regular season? Again we have adults making decisions based on what they think is the "best interest" of the kids, but when you actually talk to area players, they'd much rather lose to a team like Ursuline in a huge regular season game than lose in a playoff game to some distant po-dunk school no ones ever heard of.

  Of course the kids would want to play those games. Of course their balls are bigger than their brains at that age too. There's a reason the voting age is 18 ya know
  
  Just as example of my point is the 2008 season. Liberty finished with Howland, Hubbard and Girard. Played Howland really tough but lost both starting tackles in that game. Then lost to Hubbard, and finished with a loss in Girard. They entered that stretch undefeated and finished 7-3 and hosted a play-off game. Lost to Chagrin Falls at home, a game we should easily have won were our line up to snuff.
  
  Hell even Fitz Toussaint couldn't manage to pull Liberty out of any of those game and he was the TCPOY.
• Paladin

  Its almost laughable to sit back and read what the parochials try to dictate what is best for publics !! Believe me, an awful lot of ADULTS have taken into consideration WHO they should be in a league with -- school administrators , coaches, ADs, elected school board members and members of the comunity including the parents. If you don't like it, please note once again that as parents, THEY have decided what the BEST INTERESTS are of their public school kids.
  
  A parochial league makes alot of sense -- if you have the guts to do it. But , its obvious thats not the case. You would have to beat on each other, just as the publics do with each other and that leaves winners & LOSERS. No guts, no glory.
• Mooney44Cards

  

  Paladin wrote: Its almost laughable to sit back and read what the parochials try to dictate what is best for publics !! Believe me, an awful lot of ADULTS have taken into consideration WHO they should be in a league with -- school administrators , coaches, ADs, elected school board members and members of the comunity including the parents. If you don't like it, please note once again that as parents, THEY have decided what the BEST INTERESTS are of their public school kids.
  
  A parochial league makes alot of sense -- if you have the guts to do it. But , its obvious thats not the case. You would have to beat on each other, just as the publics do with each other and that leaves winners & LOSERS. No guts, no glory.

  Its quite obvious that Mooney doesn't have the guts to join a parochial conference because one fan posted some comments on an internet message board? lol
  
  Quit embarrassing yourself.
• Paladin

  The only thing embarrassing here is to see a attempt on an internet board to influence the addition of some parochial schools into a public school league. That simply won't happen, no matter how manys ways you " package" it, complain, campaign or otherwise bitch. Those parents who elected to send their kids to a parochial as the best interests of their kids should back off as public school parents have made a decision that being in a league with parochial schools is NOT in the BEST INTERESTS of their kids.
  
  Parochial league makes alot of sense. Would appear you don't like that. Oh well !!
• Al Bundy

  Paladin wrote: school administrators , coaches, ADs, elected school board members and members of the comunity including the parents. If you don't like it, please note once again that as parents, THEY have decided what the BEST INTERESTS are of their public school kids.
  

  I know a lot of parents of kids in Boardman and Fitch who would disgree with that statement. However, I guess getting back from athletic events at 11 on a school is in the best interest of the kids.
• Paladin

  Well if those parents are parochial parents, I catch your drift. But if you think large numbers of parents think a local league with the parochials will fly again, you have to be on drugs. Far better league with more sports competition in all sports than what the parochials offer. And none of the problems.
  
  Again, thanks for playing, but a local league with parochials won't fly. Iggy & Ed's could be interested.
• Al Bundy

  Paladin wrote: Well if those parents are parochial parents, I catch your drift. But if you think large numbers of parents think a local league with the parochials will fly again, you have to be on drugs. Far better league with more sports competition in all sports than what the parochials offer. And none of the problems.
  
  Again, thanks for playing, but a local league with parochials won't fly. Iggy & Ed's could be interested.

  Which sport has Boardman and Fitch improved in since leaving the SVC for the Fed? Their football certainly is nowhere near where it was 15-20 years ago. Boardman's girls basketball has been great in both leagues.
• Mooney44Cards

  

  Paladin wrote: The only thing embarrassing here is to see a attempt on an internet board to influence the addition of some parochial schools into a public school league. That simply won't happen, no matter how manys ways you " package" it, complain, campaign or otherwise bitch. Those parents who elected to send their kids to a parochial as the best interests of their kids should back off as public school parents have made a decision that being in a league with parochial schools is NOT in the BEST INTERESTS of their kids.
  
  Parochial league makes alot of sense. Would appear you don't like that. Oh well !!

  Yeah its so ridiculous that it existed for 40+ years up until last year. :rolleyes:
  
  Keep digging that hole.
• Mooney44Cards

  

  Al Bundy wrote:

  Paladin wrote: Well if those parents are parochial parents, I catch your drift. But if you think large numbers of parents think a local league with the parochials will fly again, you have to be on drugs. Far better league with more sports competition in all sports than what the parochials offer. And none of the problems.
  
  Again, thanks for playing, but a local league with parochials won't fly. Iggy & Ed's could be interested.

  Which sport has Boardman and Fitch improved in since leaving the SVC for the Fed? Their football certainly is nowhere near where it was 15-20 years ago. Boardman's girls basketball has been great in both leagues.

  Don't bother, he wants to paint privates and publics in the same league as being completely ridiculous to the point that we're crazy to propose it. Its a way to try to prove his point without actually stating any facts, or convincing arguments.
• ytownfootball

  

  Face it 44, nobody wants Ursuline or Mooney on the schedule because their halftime shows stink, particularly Mooney. Three flaggers and a trumpet player ain't gettin' it done at Boardman.
• ytownfootball

  

  Dude leave my posts alone, he knows damn well I'm playin' around
• GoChiefs

  

  No swearing in the HS forums. That's one of the rules. Was letting it go before..but now we are not.
• Mooney44Cards

  

  ytownfootball wrote: Face it 44, nobody wants Ursuline or Mooney on the schedule because their halftime shows stink, particularly Mooney. Three flaggers and a kazoo player ain't gettin' it done at Boardman.

  Fixed that for ya.
• ytownfootball

  

  GoChiefs wrote: No swearing in the HS forums. That's one of the rules. Was letting it go before..but now we are not.

  OK, fair enough
• Paladin

  Thats O.K. guys. If Iggy & Eds are too tough for you and Lake Catholic, Benny, Walsh, SVSM & Hoban make you shake, then its best you don't join a parochial league.
  
  And , if you got another 10 years to waste , you can continue to complain on the board about not getting into a public school league. Just trying to help !!
• Al Bundy

  Paladin wrote: Thats O.K. guys. If Iggy & Eds are too tough for you and Lake Catholic, Benny, Walsh, SVSM & Hoban make you shake, then its best you don't join a parochial league.
  
  And , if you got another 10 years to waste , you can continue to complain on the board about not getting into a public school league. Just trying to help !!

  It's about trying to create a local league. Ursuline and Mooney will do just fine without one, but we just miss out on a lot of great games. Some of the SVC games in the 80's and 90's were fun to watch. It's the kids from all of the schools involved who miss out on the local rivalries. After talking to several Boardman people at the Boardman/Mooney game, they talked about how they missed they missed the SVC.
• september63

  

  I agree with the parochial league idea. Since you all think NO one will schedule you, play one another!! I am also one that strongly said NO!! to the seperate playoffs suggestion. Rgular season, play one another.
• futbol4ever

  While I love the suggestion of Ursuline and Mooney joining a local league, it likely won't happen. As much as Paladin is trying to stir the pot and get the Mooney posters riled up, he does make a lot of sense. It is very clear that most public schools don't want to play the parochials. In some cases it doesn't make sense to an outsider (read Niles-JFK), but that is what they've chosen to do. I would love to see Poland play Mooney on a regular basis, but it's not going to happen. I also believe Brungard has every right to feel the way he does. However, if Poland had open enrollment I would not agree with him.
  I also believe JFK avoiding Ursuline (and they've avoided a lot of teams over the years) is equally as bad. I have to agree with Paladin and feel that each school is in a different situation and must make decisions that would benefit them. Yes, kids would love to see these games. These kids would also love for beer to be allowed at school lunches.
• Yama Hama

  At least the Youngstown area public schools like South Range and Poland can go back and polish their Patty-Cake Conference Champion trophies.
  
  They've got no problem playing Mooney in sports THEY KNOW they can win, but when it comes to football its different. Grow a pair.