Archive

Massillon 2011....Were Back.

  • skank
    fish82;718090 wrote:What was it that "you thought?" Spit it out, man!

    Oh, I think I know...you're hoping against all odds that the team that I obsessively root for as a middle-aged man (sound familiar?) somehow has accomplished less on the field than Massillon in the last 40+ years, so you can do some kind of internets happy dance. Am I close?

    I thought you were a coward....and I was right.
  • skank
    Of course I KNEW you were....But you just confirmed it.
  • coyotes22
    fish82;718305 wrote:Yikes...I'm not sure how you come up with "hating Massillon" and "trolling Massillon threads?". I have a grand total of three posts on the one Massy thread I see. I screw with Skank
    because he's an incredibly easy mark, nothing more...nothing less.

    I'd suggest tabling your anger/drama issues and check out the times I've DEFENDED Massilon...particularly against attacks on your previously won titles. And if you want me in the Basement...put me there or have me put there. Or, just stay all pissy and mad...it matters not to me either way. Ciao.

    8 post just on this thread. But then, I wouldnt have thought you could count.

    Maybe you, viking and Rocket should just start your own Massillon threads.
  • skank
    coyotes22;718479 wrote:8 post just on this thread. But then, I wouldnt have thought you could count.

    Maybe you, viking and Rocket should just start your own Massillon threads.

    fish can't do it because he's a coward
    viking can't do it because it'll just turn into a Buchtel love fest....even though he's from Nofe.
    Rocket can't do it because....Well, I guess he could recruit someone to do it.

    At least the spelling would be better.
  • fish82
    skank;718331 wrote:I thought you were a coward....and I was right.

    WTF are you talking about now Sparky? I'm a "coward" because I don't happen to have one team that I obsessively follow? Okay......gotcha :rolleyes:
  • skank
    fish82;718594 wrote:WTF are you talking about now Sparky? I'm a "coward" because I don't happen to have one team that I obsessively follow? Okay......gotcha :rolleyes:

    That's one of the reasons. I would say that your obsession with slamming on Massillon makes you one also....Sparky.

    I guess your lack of pride would lead one to have other things to say about you, but that's on you.
  • skank
    skank;718645 wrote:That's one of the reasons. I would say that your obsession with slamming on Massillon makes you one also....Sparky.

    I guess your lack of pride would lead one to have other things to say about you, but that's on you.

    Unless, of course....You didn't graduate from HS?
  • Rocket08
    It's always enlightening when someone is so desperate that he actually quotes himself in a thread

    Very sad
  • skank
    I had to as to not confuse you guys.
  • fish82
    skank;718661 wrote:Unless, of course....You didn't graduate from HS?
    I quite literally can not stop laughing at you. My week is made...ciao broseph! ;)
  • skank
    fish82;719040 wrote:I quite literally can not stop laughing at you. My week is made...ciao broseph! ;)

    You have quite literally just crushed me. I'll try to regroup somehow.
  • Dean Wormer
    I talked to a coach from Mooney yesterday and he told me that a game with Massillon fell through so the Cardinals bit the bullet and upgraded to McKinley. Is that true Skank?
  • skank
    Dean Wormer;719264 wrote:I talked to a coach from Mooney yesterday and he told me that a game with Massillon fell through so the Cardinals bit the bullet and upgraded to McKinley. Is that true Skank?

    If you say so. You're the expert. But, if they want to play the best as you say....why did they START talking with Massillon instead of McKinley?
  • Rocket08
    skank;720061 wrote: But, if they want to play the best as you say....why did they START talking with Massillon instead of McKinley?

    Excellent observation, Skank.

    Obviously Canton McKinley is the better program.

    Thanks for pointing that out
  • skank
    Rocket08;720067 wrote:Excellent observation, Skank.

    Obviously Canton McKinley is the better program.

    Thanks for pointing that out

    Well then, why did they talk to Massillon first? Either Massillon is the better program (because, according to you and the boys, Mooney only plays the best), Or McKinley is the better program, (and Mooney was trying to play a lesser program). One of the two, you can't have it both ways....Alter boy.
  • skank
    Dean Wormer;719264 wrote:I talked to a coach from Mooney yesterday and he told me that a game with Massillon fell through so the Cardinals bit the bullet and upgraded to McKinley. Is that true Skank?

    I talked to a coach from Massillon yesterday and he told me that a game with Mooney fell through so the Tigers decided to schedule a parochial that had less of a reputation for recruiting. Is THAT true Worm?
  • Rocket08
    Actually, You have it wrong, again choir girl

    Mooney fans don't say they only play the best, they say they'll play anyone, anytime, anywhere. You guys used to say it (the "anywhere" was a bit of a stretch, but the rest USED to be correct)

    Regarding this game, I don't have any idea what the deal was with Massillon, but Mooney is open weeks 7 and 10. The week 1 opening just came about, and Mooney and McKinley (who both had teams ditch them) jumped at the opportunity to play each other.

    Simple as that. Sorry, but it has nothing to do with picking 1 over the other. But 1 school stepped up. That's all I need to know.
  • Rocket08
    skank;720114 wrote:I talked to a coach from Massillon yesterday and he told me that a game with Mooney fell through so the Tigers decided to schedule a parochial that had less of a reputation for recruiting. Is THAT true Worm?

    That's funny.

    He actually said "the Tigers decided to schedule a parochial that had less of a chance of beating them" Don't you remember? I was standing right next to you in your delusional world of make believe
  • skank
    Rocket08;720116 wrote:Actually, You have it wrong, again choir girl

    Mooney fans don't say they only play the best, they say they'll play anyone, anytime, anywhere. You guys used to say it (the "anywhere" was a bit of a stretch, but the rest USED to be correct)

    Regarding this game, I don't have any idea what the deal was with Massillon, but Mooney is open weeks 7 and 10. The week 1 opening just came about, and Mooney and McKinley (who both had teams ditch them) jumped at the opportunity to play each other.

    Simple as that. Sorry, but it has nothing to do with picking 1 over the other. But 1 school stepped up. That's all I need to know.

    We already open with Buchtel team that put a spankin on your Cards.

    You "don't have any idea what the deal was with Massillon", yet you know that 1 school stepped up? Nice.
  • skank
    Rocket08;720119 wrote:That's funny.

    He actually said "the Tigers decided to schedule a parochial that had less of a chance of beating them" Don't you remember? I was standing right next to you in your delusional world of make believe

    In no situation....EVER....in any set of circumstances....EVER, would I ever be caught with you "standing next to me."

    Furthermore, more recruiting makes for more of a chance to win, does it not?
  • Rocket08
    You tell me

    You guys have been doing it for, like 70 years
  • Rocket08
    skank;720128 wrote:We already open with Buchtel team that put a spankin on your Cards.

    Ummm, they beat you too. In your house.

    If your team wants some of that, tell your administration to step up.

    Otherwise, just get your enjoyment out of somebody else beating us.

    It happens

    We're not afraid to compete.

    Not competing, or dodging, is what makes someone a loser
  • skank
    Rocket08;720269 wrote:Ummm, they beat you too. In your house.

    If your team wants some of that, tell your administration to step up.

    Otherwise, just get your enjoyment out of somebody else beating us.

    It happens

    We're not afraid to compete.

    Not competing, or dodging, is what makes someone a loser
    Red=They beat us by 16 in week #1, they beat you 25 after a full season of practice and competing.
    Green=Our administration must have stepped up, I love how everyone is talking about McKinley hooking up with mooney, well, Massillon has opens up with a team that spanked mooney by 25 pts.
    Get our enjoyment out of someone else beating you? You mean like you have gotten YOUR enjoyment out of somone else beating US for over 80 pages on the pub/pri thread?

    No, trolling someones else's thread makes someone a loser.
  • Gardens35
    Just read on another site, "rumor is Fitch and Massillon in 2012". I hope that one's true!
  • coyotes22
    Id vote for that.